addition to
>>>>user-defined
>>>> namespaces, other things that were dropped were E4X, undefined,
>>>> prototypes,
>>>> and dynamic classes. Basically, AS4 became more like Java and less
>>>>like
>>>> Javascript. Dropping any of these thing
; Flex.
>>> But none of them have to be dropped. You could cherry-pick the additions
>>> (as long as they are implementable on the existing runtime) rather than
>>> the
>>> removals.
>>>
>>> - Gordon
>>>
>>> -Original Messa
It probably does, since they are following the ECMA standard ATM. Would be
nice though.
-Mark
-Original Message-
From: Avi Kessner [mailto:akess...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2014 1:22 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: RE: ActionScript 4? What the hell?
Does function
han
>>the
>> removals.
>>
>> - Gordon
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Gordon Smith [mailto:gosm...@adobe.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2014 11:20 AM
>> To: dev@flex.apache.org
>> Subject: RE: ActionScript 4? What the hell?
>&
the
> removals.
>
> - Gordon
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Gordon Smith [mailto:gosm...@adobe.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2014 11:20 AM
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: RE: ActionScript 4? What the hell?
>
> > the main thrust of the language was a to
@flex.apache.org
Subject: RE: ActionScript 4? What the hell?
> the main thrust of the language was a totally new language geared for
> functional programming, and then some backward compatibility stuff to make it
> seem more like ActionScript.
I wouldn't characterize it that way.
uld only contain a reference to a function that took
two ints and returned a String. It also added array types like
var a:[]int;
- Gordon
-Original Message-
From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2014 11:06 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: Action
Gordon
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Kessler CTR Mark J [mailto:mark.kessler@usmc.mil]
>Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2014 10:32 AM
>To: dev@flex.apache.org
>Subject: RE: ActionScript 4? What the hell?
>
> Well using the assumption that AS 4 would be an improvem
anuary 22, 2014 10:55 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: RE: ActionScript 4? What the hell?
Adobe designed AS4 to be the language for a new Flash runtime ("V12") that it
was working on but dropped. (I was working on the AS4 compiler then.) Not all
features of AS4 can be implemented -- at l
ubject: RE: ActionScript 4? What the hell?
Well using the assumption that AS 4 would be an improvement in some area's
from AS3 even if it was an incomplete work. While I haven't looked at it yet,
I would be interested in just seeing the differences and bring over small
pie
it wasn't in the same
direction as ASC 2 which started getting rid of things we use.
-Mark
-Original Message-
From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2014 12:20 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: ActionScript 4? What the hell?
I'm not
>Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2014 11:15 AM
>To: dev@flex.apache.org
>Subject: Re: ActionScript 4? What the hell?
>
>DarkStone wrote
>> I believe Adobe said in the flash runtime roadmap that AS4 was dropped:
>> http://www.adobe.com/devnet/flashplatform/whitepapers/
? What the hell?
DarkStone wrote
> I believe Adobe said in the flash runtime roadmap that AS4 was dropped:
> http://www.adobe.com/devnet/flashplatform/whitepapers/roadmap.html
>
> Now they reopen AS4 on GitHub, what does it mean?
>From the read me on the github project: "Ado
esume
>development of ActionScript 4."
>
>Looks like it is just for reference only, Adobe has no plans to continue
>development, unfortunately. :-(
>
>
>
>--
>View this message in context:
>http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/ActionScript-4-Wh
compiler and runtime is not available. Adobe has no plans to resume
development of ActionScript 4."
Looks like it is just for reference only, Adobe has no plans to continue
development, unfortunately. :-(
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.co
s take us, Flex 5 vs Flex JS? or Flex 5 will be Flex JS?
> We can enter in a some conspiracy theories that that was always the plan
> of Adobe :)
> But with some new fresh blood in the web maybe will be also good for the
> flex project...
>
> > Subject: ActionScript 4? What
...
> Subject: ActionScript 4? What the hell?
> From: darkst...@163.com
> Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 16:58:30 +0800
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
>
> Adobe just committed AS4 specifications and related documents to GitHub:
> https://github.com/adobe-research/ActionScript4?files=1
>
>
Adobe just committed AS4 specifications and related documents to GitHub:
https://github.com/adobe-research/ActionScript4?files=1
I believe Adobe said in the flash runtime roadmap that AS4 was dropped:
http://www.adobe.com/devnet/flashplatform/whitepapers/roadmap.html
Now they reopen AS4 on GitHub
18 matches
Mail list logo
