Hi,
I'm pretty sure this has been discussed before, but I can't find the thread...
In 'build.properties' the property 'playerglobal.version' is set to
11.1, making it the de facto default for the SDK. Isn't it time to
update that to 11.7, the current long-term support version?
EdB
--
Ix Multi
Not if you are on Linux, which is stuck down there...
Tom
On 19/07/2013 10:33, Erik de Bruin wrote:
Hi,
I'm pretty sure this has been discussed before, but I can't find the thread...
In 'build.properties' the property 'playerglobal.version' is set to
11.1, making it the de facto default for t
Isn't the latest for Linux 11.2?
EdB
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 11:50 AM, Tom Chiverton wrote:
> Not if you are on Linux, which is stuck down there...
>
> Tom
>
>
> On 19/07/2013 10:33, Erik de Bruin wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm pretty sure this has been discussed before, but I can't find the
>> th
It is, but you suggested 11.7 as a minimum ;-)
Tom
On 19/07/2013 10:53, Erik de Bruin wrote:
Isn't the latest for Linux 11.2?
EdB
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 11:50 AM, Tom Chiverton wrote:
Not if you are on Linux, which is stuck down there...
Tom
On 19/07/2013 10:33, Erik de Bruin wrote:
No, I suggested 11.7 as default. Now, I'm not a native speaker and the
subtleties of the English language escape me sometimes, but I think
there is a difference?
EdB
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Tom Chiverton wrote:
> It is, but you suggested 11.7 as a minimum ;-)
>
> Tom
>
>
> On 19/07/2
Well, I guess we can choose the default many ways.
The lowest version the SDK will compile to ?
The lowest version supported by Adobe across all our platforms ?
The newest version supported by Adobe across all our platforms ?
The latest and greatest released version ?
There's up and down sides t
Hi,
I say we stick to 11.1 this version, as we shouldn't force people to upgrade
FP. Most people will install via the installer where they can select the
version now so it's probably not a big issue.
Going forward 11.7 is the version that will be security fixes so there a reason
to make that t
I say we stick to 11.1 this version, as we shouldn't force people to
upgrade FP
+1 to that Justin as discussed many times before.
-Fred
-Message d'origine-
From: Justin Mclean
Sent: Friday, July 19, 2013 1:07 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: Default Flash Play
o:jus...@classsoftware.com]
Sent: Friday, July 19, 2013 7:08 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: Default Flash Player version (build.properties)
Hi,
I say we stick to 11.1 this version, as we shouldn't force people to upgrade
FP. Most people will install via the installer where they can select the
v
Hi,
> If it were anything more than a minor update I would say always use the
> latest stable flash player.
I'm all for adding something to the README to encourage people use the latest
for security and performance reasons. Anyone suggest some text?
However not everyone has the luxury of being
On Jul 19, 2013 4:46 AM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > If it were anything more than a minor update I would say always use the
latest stable flash player.
> I'm all for adding something to the README to encourage people use the
latest for security and performance reasons. Anyone suggest som
On 19/07/2013 12:45, Justin Mclean wrote:
However not everyone has the luxury of being able to update to the very latest
Flash Player version - especially in a locked downed corporate environment.
Although if I read this blog right, isn't 10.x no longer supported at
all then ?
http://blogs.ad
Hi,
> Although if I read this blog right, isn't 10.x no longer supported at all
> then ?
As far as I'm aware security patches are still being release for older Android
versions and Linux versions.
Justin
Hi,
Yep - for instance:
http://www.adobe.com/support/security/bulletins/apsb13-17.html
Justin
On 19/07/2013 14:22, Justin Mclean wrote:
Hi,
Although if I read this blog right, isn't 10.x no longer supported at all then ?
As far as I'm aware security patches are still being release for older Android
versions and Linux versions.
More reassuring than the empty space on
http://www.adobe
013 7:46 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: Default Flash Player version (build.properties)
Hi,
> If it were anything more than a minor update I would say always use the
> latest stable flash player.
I'm all for adding something to the README to encourage people use the latest
for
16 matches
Mail list logo
