: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: RE: AW: Flex resolution of transitive dependencies
Note on what I just said.
Even though to me it would be ideal as I described it, now I'm thinking about a
little bit more, I wonder if it could work every time, I remember for
'included', at time I
Thanks
Frédéric THOMAS
> From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: RE: AW: Flex resolution of transitive dependencies
> Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 10:14:41 +
>
> Hi Chris,
> So, to me the optimal usage would be to translate the transitive depende
rk as expected in case it has
transitive dependencies too, right ?
Is it the same usage for you too ?
Thanks,
Frédéric THOMAS
> From: christofer.d...@c-ware.de
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: AW: Flex resolution of transitive dependencies
> Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 18:23:01 +
o get used to thinking maven as with Ant you usually throw
everything into the same pot ... eclipse doesn't even distinguish between a
compile and a test classpath :-(
Chris
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Frédéric THOMAS [mailto:webdoubl...@hotmail.com]
Gesendet: Montag, 9. Februa
-ware.de
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: Flex resolution of transitive dependencies
> Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2015 12:33:18 +
>
> Since Maven 3.1 a bug has been fixed that we were relying on for building
> Flex applications. This caused any transitive dependencies of "rsl", "
Hi Chris,
Unfortunately, I have no idea what you are talking about..
-Alex
On 2/8/15, 4:33 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>Since Maven 3.1 a bug has been fixed that we were relying on for building
>Flex applications. This caused any transitive dependencies of "rsl",
>"cache" and "included" scope
Since Maven 3.1 a bug has been fixed that we were relying on for building Flex
applications. This caused any transitive dependencies of "rsl", "cache" and
"included" scoped dependencies to be omitted from the build. I am currently
extending FlexMojos to manually handle the flex scopes. But I am
