No they are fine these days. This was around the parity release time
frame. Still setting up by hand requires a lot of steps. (shame we can't
make some kind of installer... kidding!)
-Mark
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 4:30 PM, Gordon Smith wrote:
> Are you saying that the instructions on how to
@flex.apache.org
Subject: RE: [DRAFT] Apache Flex September 2013 Report
Carol helped me out to fix my setup when I was just getting my GIT setup
started. I'm sure I gave her some gray hairs over it lol. But once you have
it setup right the first time, it's much easier the next few times :
On 9/10/13 4:44 AM, "Nicholas Kwiatkowski" wrote:
>Understood. My thought was on more testing participation in general, not
>just committers. Either way, I would venture to say that at least 50% of
>our committers list has never gotten Mustella to fully compile on their
>computers yet. And t
Understood. My thought was on more testing participation in general, not
just committers. Either way, I would venture to say that at least 50% of
our committers list has never gotten Mustella to fully compile on their
computers yet. And that may be from lack of participation to having
technical
Carol helped me out to fix my setup when I was just getting my GIT setup
started. I'm sure I gave her some gray hairs over it lol. But once you have
it setup right the first time, it's much easier the next few times :P.
-Mark
-Original Message-
Most committers (!) should be able to d
> may be one of our sticking points. Compiling from source still requires
> some voodoo magic if you are doing it all from scratch and you haven't done
> it before..
Most committers (!) should be able to do this... And should actually
have done this many, many times :-)
EdB
--
Ix Multimedia
Let' not read too much into the fact that committers take vacations during
their summer - and that summer is a different time of year in the southern
hemisphere.
On Sep 9, 2013, at 6:53 PM, Dasa Paddock wrote:
> GitHub has some good tools for this too. For example, this shows that there
> were
GitHub has some good tools for this too. For example, this shows that there
were six committers to the flex-sdk repo in July and August:
https://github.com/apache/flex-sdk/graphs/contributors?from=2013-06-30&to=2013-08-31&type=c
--Dasa
On Sep 9, 2013, at 5:11 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
Hi,
It's looking at both the git and svn repos but is missing a few git repos eg
falcon.
I don't think the numbers are 100% correct but do give a fair indication, and I
think it fair to say there are less active committers for the Flex SDK project
than there were 6 months ago.
Justin
On Sep 9, 2013, at 5:03 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> Do you think the number of committers is a threat to the project?
>
> I think it's a concern and may make further releases harder. It's something
> that needs to be watched and users/people on dev list encouraged more to take
> part
On Sep 9, 2013, at 4:56 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> Thanks for the input. What is the "release candidate vote issue"?
>
> An RC was voted in as released but not released.
>
> IMO we had more RC than we should due to lack of committer involvement (and
> the release manager job harder)
On 9/9/13 4:56 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> Thanks for the input. What is the "release candidate vote issue"?
>
>An RC was voted in as released but not released.
>
>IMO we had more RC than we should due to lack of committer involvement
>(and the release manager job harder). With the nu
I know I was in the middle of my testing suite when the vote expired. I
was on vacation for two days and the full Mustella suite takes about 24
hours (if it runs correctly the first time) to run, so I missed it. We
still don't make it easy for people to evaluate the non-binary setup which
may be
Hi,
Also it might be worth mentioning the (not insignificant) work on FlexUnit and
the SWZ Framework donation (although not sure where that's at).
Thanks,
Justin
Hi,
> Do you think the number of committers is a threat to the project?
I think it's a concern and may make further releases harder. It's something
that needs to be watched and users/people on dev list encouraged more to take
part and become committers.
Thanks,
Justin
- decreasing number of active committers [2]
>
> 2. http://www.ohloh.net/p/ApacheFlex/contributors/summary
I dont think the Ohloh numbers are correct. They are not looking at all
the projects and for most of them they are still looking at the old SVN
repos [3]
Someone with an Ohloh account can
Hi,
> Thanks for the input. What is the "release candidate vote issue"?
An RC was voted in as released but not released.
IMO we had more RC than we should due to lack of committer involvement (and the
release manager job harder). With the number of committers we have in the
project a release
On Sep 9, 2013, at 4:40 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> Mailing list traffic is so high that folks have stopped reading emails.
> Traffic has actually decreasing for the last 7 months month on month so not
> sure that's correct [1]. I think it's just that some people prefer forums.
>
> Cur
Thanks for the input. What is the "release candidate vote issue"?
Thanks,
-Alex
On 9/9/13 4:40 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> Mailing list traffic is so high that folks have stopped reading emails.
>Traffic has actually decreasing for the last 7 months month on month so
>not sure that's
Hi,
> Mailing list traffic is so high that folks have stopped reading emails.
Traffic has actually decreasing for the last 7 months month on month so not
sure that's correct [1]. I think it's just that some people prefer forums.
Currently we've had about 10 people sign up to the dev list and 20
Typo: "Apache Flex SDK 4.19.0" must be "Apache Flex SDK 4.10.0 "
Download numbers are a bit off. I would put it like this:
- Since beginning of this year, the Installer has been used to install over
16,000 copies of the SDK. There were more than 5000 installs of 4.10.0 in
the month since its rel
21 matches
Mail list logo
