Jira task to move flexunit sources
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6152 is still open.. It might help
to speed up the migration if you vote for this task.
Thx
Cyrill
On 4/14/13 6:52 AM, "Michael A. Labriola"
wrote:
>> My understanding is that, from a donation standpoint, it is ok to have
>> binaries in the donation as long as you legally have the right to donate
>> them. Then, at some point, the binaries "must" be removed because >Apache is
>> all about s
>Are those in adobe's jira? Tried to find them but without succes.
Side note, we also have a build setup and all scripts to donate:
http://flexunit.digitalprimates.net:8080/
Mike
>Is that branch (with removed harmcrest dependencies) also in github.. because
>as far as I can see there is only one branch (master) in github.
Correct. We only leave master under the main github repo and contributors work
in their own forks. That was out model
> There were only a few open issues. We will need to recreate as they were
> apparently lost when Adobe's jira moved.
>>Are those in adobe's jira? Tried to find them but without succes.
Correct, that's what I said. They were lost when Adobe moved
>My understanding is that, from a donation standpoint, it is ok to have
>binaries in the donation as long as you legally have the right to donate them.
> Then, at some point, the binaries "must" be removed because >Apache is all
>about source.
Right, that's my point. We don't have permission t
> There were only a few open issues. We will need to recreate as they were
> apparently lost when Adobe's jira moved.
Are those in adobe's jira? Tried to find them but without succes.
Cyrill
Infra task to import git repo is created.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6152
Sent from my iPhone
On 14.04.2013, at 11:20, "Michael A. Labriola"
wrote:
>> Just to double check: The sources on
>> https://github.com/flexunit/flexunit are the most up-to-date?
>
> Yes, those are th
On 4/13/13 8:20 PM, "Michael A. Labriola"
wrote:
> If we move the entire repo, then that would mean there is a copy of both of
> these binaries in the history of the repo are we violating anything by
> doing this?
>
My understanding is that, from a donation standpoint, it is ok to have
bi
> Right now the version in git references the FlexUnit .9 swc and the
> hamcrest.swc. Adobe hasn't donated FlexUnit .9 so we really can't just
> include that and although there was talk of moving hamcrest here, that hasn't
> happened. A long while ago, I made a version that removed these depende
>Just to double check: The sources on
>https://github.com/flexunit/flexunit are the most up-to-date?
Yes, those are the most current now getting back into this, we do have a
bit of complexity. Sorry, its been a while since I thought about this.
Right now the version in git references the Fle
Just to double check: The sources on
https://github.com/flexunit/flexunit are the most up-to-date?
Cyrill
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 4:29 AM, Michael A. Labriola
wrote:
>>Beside the source code there is also documentation wiki, asdoc, open issues
>>(are there open issues? :)) we might bring over t
>Beside the source code there is also documentation wiki, asdoc, open issues
>(are there open issues? :)) we might bring over to apache. Did you plan to
>donate those too to Apache.
Yes in all cases. Much of it is already checked into git. I sent links to the
few things that can also come over
ra moved.
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Cyrill Zadra [mailto:cyrill.za...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, April 13, 2013 4:49 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Mentor] & [PPMC] FlexUnit
Hi Mike
Beside the source code there is also documentation wiki, asdoc, open issues
(are there
Hi Mike
Beside the source code there is also documentation wiki, asdoc, open
issues (are there open issues? :)) we might bring over to apache. Did
you plan to donate those too to Apache.
Cyrill
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 2:03 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> I would vote for flex-flexunit
>
>
> On 4/12/13
I would vote for flex-flexunit
On 4/12/13 5:43 PM, "Cyrill Zadra" wrote:
> Ok ..I'll try to :-).
>
> Where is FlexUnit supposed to land? In utilities repo or in a own repo named
> "flex-flexunit" or just "flex-unit"?
>
> Cyrill
>
> On 13.04.2013, at 02:19, "Michael A. Labriola"
> wrote:
>
The FlexUnit sources on https://github.com/flexunit/flexunit.git are
uptodate? Or is it a local git repo you mentioned?
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 8:43 AM, Cyrill Zadra wrote:
> Ok ..I'll try to :-).
>
> Where is FlexUnit supposed to land? In utilities repo or in a own repo named
> "flex-flexunit"
Ok ..I'll try to :-).
Where is FlexUnit supposed to land? In utilities repo or in a own repo named
"flex-flexunit" or just "flex-unit"?
Cyrill
On 13.04.2013, at 02:19, "Michael A. Labriola"
wrote:
>> OK, do you want Cyrill's help or do you have the cycles to make this happen?
>
> Help plea
>OK, do you want Cyrill's help or do you have the cycles to make this happen?
Help please.
On 4/12/13 10:49 AM, "Michael A. Labriola"
wrote:
>>> Now that we moved to git .. is there anything else that prevents the
>>> donation of FlexUnit? Can I help here out to make it happen?
>> I would imagine Mike L would be pleased if you helped him out by requesting
>> the git repo from Infra.
>> Now that we moved to git .. is there anything else that prevents the
>> donation of FlexUnit? Can I help here out to make it happen?
>I would imagine Mike L would be pleased if you helped him out by requesting
>the git repo from Infra. I'm not sure how Git-to-Git migration works. Is
>there a
On 4/12/13 9:40 AM, "Cyrill Zadra" wrote:
> Now that we moved to git .. is there anything else that prevents the
> donation of FlexUnit? Can I help here out to make it happen?
I would imagine Mike L would be pleased if you helped him out by requesting
the git repo from Infra. I'm not sure how
Now that we moved to git .. is there anything else that prevents the
donation of FlexUnit? Can I help here out to make it happen?
Cyrill
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 6:25 AM, Michael A. Labriola
wrote:
>>How is the Flexunit donation making progress?
>
> It's not.
>
> Technically FlexUnit was already
>How is the Flexunit donation making progress?
It's not.
Technically FlexUnit was already donated. All of the forms have been filled out
and approved, however, the last discussion suggested that we wait until we were
on git to move over the code, therefore it is in a permanent holding pattern.
Hi,
How is the Flexunit donation making progress?
Our website [1] states the following:
"We use FlexUnit for unit testing. FlexUnit is in the initial phases of being
donated to the Apache Flex project, more information will be posted here as it
becomes available."
Sincerely Yours,
Sebastian
25 matches
Mail list logo
