;
>
> Maurice
>
>
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Maurice Amsellem [mailto:maurice.amsel...@systar.com]
> Envoyé : mardi 19 novembre 2013 01:47
> À : dev@flex.apache.org
> Objet : RE: [dev] Build failed in Jenkins: flex-sdk_mustella-mobile #369
>
> Got it:
or me now.
Maurice
-Message d'origine-
De : Maurice Amsellem [mailto:maurice.amsel...@systar.com]
Envoyé : mardi 19 novembre 2013 01:47
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : RE: [dev] Build failed in Jenkins: flex-sdk_mustella-mobile #369
Got it:
In Mustella FakeSoftKeyboard.as , lin
mardi 19 novembre 2013 00:39
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : RE: [dev] Build failed in Jenkins: flex-sdk_mustella-mobile #369
FYI, I am still struggling with the last Mutella failure:
mobile/SoftKeyboard/properties/SK_StageText_Properties
SoftKeyboard_StageText_property_resizeForSoftKeyb
x27;s a little bit tricky, I hope to be done soon.
Maurice
-Message d'origine-
De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Envoyé : lundi 18 novembre 2013 20:47
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : Re: [dev] Build failed in Jenkins: flex-sdk_mustella-mobile #369
On 11/18/13 11:19 AM
On 11/18/13 11:19 AM, "Maurice Amsellem"
wrote:
>
>So does the old StyleableStageText really have less memory requirement
>even in that case? Not so sure...
I don't know the code that well, but my understanding is that, if you
don't have popups, you can save on memory. But is it enough to matte
WDYT ?
Maurice
-Message d'origine-
De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Envoyé : lundi 18 novembre 2013 18:49
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : Re: [dev] Build failed in Jenkins: flex-sdk_mustella-mobile #369
On 11/18/13 9:38 AM, "Maurice Amsellem"
wrote:
>
>Anyway, I c
On 11/18/13 9:38 AM, "Maurice Amsellem"
wrote:
>
>Anyway, I checked the xml DL, and the coordinates/extents are exactly the
>same, expect that the new skin has a bitmap, so there is no computation
>error and nothing we can really do about that, apart from updating the
>baselines.
OK, then it is
l...@systar.com]
Envoyé : lundi 18 novembre 2013 18:38
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : RE: [dev] Build failed in Jenkins: flex-sdk_mustella-mobile #369
>I haven't seen the image diffs, so I don't know what you mean by
>sub-pixel. There are two common cases: 1) a few pixels are different
ns of each.
I would really prefer to have ONE skin, improve/fix it until it behaves well in
all situations, and put the other ones in the "deprecated" status.
WDYT?
Maurice
-Message d'origine-
De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Envoyé : lundi 18 novembre 2013 18:22
À
On 11/18/13 8:25 AM, "Maurice Amsellem"
wrote:
>> the code paths these tests used to verify are still there
>Sorry, I send the email too quick.
>
>In fact, the only visual differences between old and new baselines are
>because of sub-pixel diff. The rendering is the same. And the scrolling
>be
not tested.
If it was, it would have failed.
WDYT?
Maurice
-Message d'origine-
De : Maurice Amsellem
Envoyé : lundi 18 novembre 2013 17:23
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : RE: [dev] Build failed in Jenkins: flex-sdk_mustella-mobile #369
>Sorry, I haven't had time to follow t
mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Envoyé : lundi 18 novembre 2013 17:09
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : Re: [dev] Build failed in Jenkins: flex-sdk_mustella-mobile #369
Sorry, I haven't had time to follow the details. The baselines should not be
removed if they are correct for StageTextInputSkin.
gt; width="182" height="35">
>
>
>[...]
>
>
>So it's good for me...
>
>Maurice
>
>-Message d'origine-----
>De : omup...@gmail.com [mailto:omup...@gmail.com] De la part de OmPrakash
>Muppirala
>Envoyé :
06
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : Re: [dev] Build failed in Jenkins: flex-sdk_mustella-mobile #369
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 11:56 PM, Maurice Amsellem <
maurice.amsel...@systar.com> wrote:
> Checked the .bad.png.
> All are the same: sub-pixel shift when the action bar contains a text
> input.
&
lem
> Envoyé : lundi 18 novembre 2013 08:49
> À : 'Erik de Bruin'
> Cc : dev@flex.apache.org
> Objet : RE: [dev] Build failed in Jenkins: flex-sdk_mustella-mobile #369
>
> Yes, but didn't run all the mobile tests, only TextInput, TextArea and
> StageText.
>
>
13 08:49
À : 'Erik de Bruin'
Cc : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : RE: [dev] Build failed in Jenkins: flex-sdk_mustella-mobile #369
Yes, but didn't run all the mobile tests, only TextInput, TextArea and
StageText.
-Message d'origine-
De : Erik de Bruin [mailto:e...@ixsoftware.
Yes, but didn't run all the mobile tests, only TextInput, TextArea and
StageText.
-Message d'origine-
De : Erik de Bruin [mailto:e...@ixsoftware.nl]
Envoyé : lundi 18 novembre 2013 08:47
À : Maurice Amsellem
Cc : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : Re: [dev] Build failed in Jen
Hi,
Playing 'bad cop' here: did you run the mobile Mustella tests before
pushing the commits?
EdB
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 8:41 AM, Maurice Amsellem
wrote:
> Analysing the failures...
>
> -Message d'origine-
> De : flex.muste...@gmail.com [mailto:flex.muste...@gmail.com]
> Envoyé : lun
18 matches
Mail list logo
