11:09 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: How to get a clean working tree for flex-sdk
Hi,
> After you do 'ant clean main checkintests' in flex-sdk, 'git status' now says
>
>nothing to commit (working directory clean)
And what does "ant release" give?
Thanks,
Justin
Hi,
>The Adobe Extension Manager for Windows can be downloaded from:
>
> http://download.macromedia.com/pub/dw_exchange/extension_manager/win/AdobeExtensionManager5All.zip
>
>On Windows, set ADOBE_EXTENSION_MANAGER to the absolute path of "Adobe
> Extension Manager CS
rom: Justin Mclean [mailto:jus...@classsoftware.com]
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2013 11:09 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: How to get a clean working tree for flex-sdk
Hi,
> After you do 'ant clean main checkintests' in flex-sdk, 'git status' now says
>
>noth
Hi,
> After you do 'ant clean main checkintests' in flex-sdk, 'git status' now says
>
>nothing to commit (working directory clean)
And what does "ant release" give?
Thanks,
Justin
epository. It didn't belong there because it gets
built from flex-config-template.xml.
- Gordon
-Original Message-
From: Gordon Smith [mailto:gosm...@adobe.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2013 8:18 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: RE: How to get a clean working tree for flex-sdk
Back
gt; tasks with an that executes a small Java program (which we
> would have to compile from source).
>
> Is anybody else doing Apache Flex development using Cygwin?
>
> - Gordon
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
> Sent: Thursd
?
>
> - Gordon
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2013 10:44 PM
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: Re: How to get a clean working tree for flex-sdk
>
> Can we get the build to save a copy of these files before
The .mxi is a source file so it shouldn't be in gitignore. The Extension
Manager changes its permissions to executable for unknown reason. I thought
I checked in an .mxi file with executable permissions to try to cure this
problem. Maybe I put it in the wrong branch or maybe it didn't work on
Wi
Hi,
JFYI I'm running into a similar issue in windows in OSX. FlexComponentKit.mxi
seems to have differing permissions but not sure if it should be added to
.gitignore or not.
You may also need to modify build.properties depending on your setup (eg TLF
path) - how do we deal with that?
Thanks
have to
compile from source).
Is anybody else doing Apache Flex development using Cygwin?
- Gordon
-Original Message-
From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2013 10:44 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: How to get a clean working tree for fl
solution is to just use Command Prompt instead of Cygwin, but
> then I have to give up other stuff. And another is to use a Mac, which is what
> most people seem to be doing these days.
>
> - Gordon
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
>
tuff. And another is to use a Mac, which is what
most people seem to be doing these days.
- Gordon
-Original Message-
From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2013 8:46 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: How to get a clean working tree for flex-sdk
Awesom
...@adobe.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2013 1:31 PM
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: RE: How to get a clean working tree for flex-sdk
>
> I've pushed the file mode fixes to flex-sdk.
>
> 'ant clean main checkintests' works for me in Cygwin on Windows. Plea
h
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2013 2:28 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: RE: How to get a clean working tree for flex-sdk
Fred, were you going to make changes to .gitignore?
- Gordon
-Original Message-
From: Gordon Smith [mailto:gosm...@adobe.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2013 5:24 PM
To: de
Fred, were you going to make changes to .gitignore?
- Gordon
-Original Message-
From: Gordon Smith [mailto:gosm...@adobe.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2013 5:24 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: RE: How to get a clean working tree for flex-sdk
OK, I've cleaned up the bad file
essage-
From: Gordon Smith [mailto:gosm...@adobe.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2013 1:14 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: RE: How to get a clean working tree for flex-sdk
> After you're done, will a simple pull correct the local repo's?
I'm not a Git expert, but I'm p
n Smith [mailto:gosm...@adobe.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2013 1:14 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: RE: How to get a clean working tree for flex-sdk
> After you're done, will a simple pull correct the local repo's?
I'm not a Git expert, but I'm pretty sure that it will. How
of. Fixing this is just housecleaning.
- Gordon
-Original Message-
From: Kessler CTR Mark J [mailto:mark.kessler@usmc.mil]
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2013 10:25 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: RE: How to get a clean working tree for flex-sdk
After you're done, will a s
After you're done, will a simple pull correct the local repo's?
-Mark
-Original Message-
From: Gordon Smith [mailto:gosm...@adobe.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2013 1:18 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: RE: How to get a clean working tree for flex-sdk
I'll work on
I'll work on fixing the bad file modes in the Git repos.
- Gordon
-Original Message-
From: Gordon Smith [mailto:gosm...@adobe.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2013 5:17 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: RE: How to get a clean working tree for flex-sdk
My guess is that someone wo
From: Gordon Smith [mailto:gosm...@adobe.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2013 5:02 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: RE: How to get a clean working tree for flex-sdk
frameworks/projects/advancedgrids/bundles/en_GB/datamanagement.properties
mistakenly had svn:executable set to * in the SVN repo
cripts are changing the file mode to executable without needing to
do so.
- Gordon
-Original Message-
From: Dasa Paddock [mailto:dpadd...@esri.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2013 4:47 PM
To:
Subject: Re: How to get a clean working tree for flex-sdk
$ git ls-files --stage | gr
$ git ls-files --stage | grep "100755"
shows that there are a lot of files that are set as executable that don't need
to be, like:
frameworks/projects/advancedgrids/bundles/en_GB/datamanagement.properties
--Dasa
On Apr 3, 2013, at 4:36 PM, Dasa Paddock wrote:
> You can use this to see what
Ah ok, well, I guess that could be the reason too.
-Fred
-Message d'origine-
From: Gordon Smith
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2013 1:38 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: RE: How to get a clean working tree for flex-sdk
I do Ant and Git in Cygwin on Windows. Maybe that ma
I do Ant and Git in Cygwin on Windows. Maybe that makes a difference.
- Gordon
-Original Message-
From: Frédéric THOMAS [mailto:webdoubl...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2013 4:36 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: How to get a clean working tree for flex-sdk
The weird
You can use this to see what the mode is set to for a file:
$ git ls-files --stage
--Dasa
On Apr 3, 2013, at 4:29 PM, Frédéric THOMAS
wrote:
> I just read the git mode particularities from [1]
>
> In this case, you’re specifying a mode of 100644, which means it’s a normal
> file. Other opt
The weird thing is it didn't happened to me :P
-Fred
-Message d'origine-
From: Gordon Smith
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2013 1:32 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: RE: How to get a clean working tree for flex-sdk
So it sounds like the build scripts have somehow made t
..@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2013 4:32 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: How to get a clean working tree for flex-sdk
Amen to that... ;-)
On Apr 4, 2013, at 2:26 AM, Mark Kessler wrote:
> After reading this, I think I'll stay with my syncing the Flex-SDK to
>
at we generally want 'git status' to not show
build output but only editing changes.
- Gordon
-Original Message-
From: Mark Kessler [mailto:kesslerconsult...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2013 4:27 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: How to get a clean working tree f
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2013 4:29 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: How to get a clean working tree for flex-sdk
I just read the git mode particularities from [1]
In this case, you’re specifying a mode of 100644, which means it’s a normal
file. Other options are 100755, which means it’
Amen to that… ;-)
On Apr 4, 2013, at 2:26 AM, Mark Kessler wrote:
> After reading this, I think I'll stay with my syncing the Flex-SDK to a
> separate folder when I want to build it. Sounds like cleaning up files
> after building in your git repo is a PITA.
>
> -Mark
27;git status' to not show build
output but only editing changes.
- Gordon
-Original Message-
From: Mark Kessler [mailto:kesslerconsult...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2013 4:27 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: How to get a clean working tree for flex-sdk
After readin
il 04, 2013 1:26 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: RE: How to get a clean working tree for flex-sdk
The Ant scripts are rewriting these files to inject version numbers. (Ugh!)
So many your suggestion of ignoring mode differences is a good idea.
However, I would still like to understand whether
.
- Gordon
-Original Message-
From: Gordon Smith
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2013 4:22 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: RE: How to get a clean working tree for flex-sdk
I looked at these two files in Subversion. Both have only the svn:ol-style
property set, like many other files.
When you
After reading this, I think I'll stay with my syncing the Flex-SDK to a
separate folder when I want to build it. Sounds like cleaning up files
after building in your git repo is a PITA.
-Mark
AFAIK, yes.
-Fred
-Message d'origine-
From: Gordon Smith
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2013 1:21 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: RE: How to get a clean working tree for flex-sdk
I looked at these two files in Subversion. Both have only the svn:ol-style
property set, like many
: Frédéric THOMAS [mailto:webdoubl...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2013 4:00 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: How to get a clean working tree for flex-sdk
You might be right, it's better to determinate why they're changed by the
build, maybe we should find how they were
013 12:53 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: RE: How to get a clean working tree for flex-sdk
I don't think there is any reason why the file mode of these files should be
changing, so I'm not convinced we should start ignoring diffs of file modes.
- Gordon
-Original Message--
PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: How to get a clean working tree for flex-sdk
Yes.
-Fred
-Message d'origine-
From: Gordon Smith
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2013 12:50 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: RE: How to get a clean working tree for flex-sdk
Are you saying that it tell
Yes.
-Fred
-Message d'origine-
From: Gordon Smith
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2013 12:50 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: RE: How to get a clean working tree for flex-sdk
Are you saying that it tells Git to ignore differences in a file's mode?
- Gordon
-Origin
Are you saying that it tells Git to ignore differences in a file's mode?
- Gordon
-Original Message-
From: Frédéric THOMAS [mailto:webdoubl...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2013 3:48 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: How to get a clean working tree for flex-sdk
It
It will avoid git to consider those files as modified, so they won't appear
on git status
-Fred
-Message d'origine-
From: Gordon Smith
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2013 12:39 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: RE: How to get a clean working tree for flex-sdk
Please explain
Sorry, you right, I thought I had already merged my branch where the
.gitignore is updated.
-Fred
-Message d'origine-
From: Gordon Smith
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2013 12:37 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: RE: How to get a clean working tree for flex-sdk
Your repo is not
nesday, April 03, 2013 3:39 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: RE: How to get a clean working tree for flex-sdk
Please explain what that will do. And before we decide to do this, please be
aware that there are some files that need to have their executable bit set,
such as the mxmlc script.
-
03, 2013 3:36 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: How to get a clean working tree for flex-sdk
or 'git config --global core.filemode false' for the general git settings.
-Fred
-Message d'origine-
From: Frédéric THOMAS
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2013 12:34 AM
To: dev@
ignore;h=0c84fc394c4ab4a92795a54ed61d97ac09fdb4eb;hb=develop
- Gordon
-Original Message-
From: Frédéric THOMAS [mailto:webdoubl...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2013 10:51 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: How to get a clean working tree for flex-sdk
Gordon,
Check
https://cwiki.apache.org/co
or 'git config --global core.filemode false' for the general git settings.
-Fred
-Message d'origine-
From: Frédéric THOMAS
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2013 12:34 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: How to get a clean working tree for flex-sdk
Then I guess everybody
Then I guess everybody should run 'git config core.filemode false' on their
repos, I will add it to the wiki.
-Fred
-Message d'origine-
From: Gordon Smith
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2013 12:29 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: RE: How to get a clean working tree for
- Gordon
-Original Message-
From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2013 9:30 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: How to get a clean working tree for flex-sdk
"not stages" is like SVN saying a file is modified.
"untracked" is like SVN saying a file
come from?
- Gordon
-Original Message-
From: Frédéric THOMAS [mailto:webdoubl...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2013 11:47 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: How to get a clean working tree for flex-sdk
I can't see anything special but I suggest you to replace its co
From: Frédéric THOMAS [mailto:webdoubl...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2013 11:47 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: How to get a clean working tree for flex-sdk
I can't see anything special but I suggest you to replace its content by [1]
and in more what there's in the wik
riginal Message-
From: Frédéric THOMAS [mailto:webdoubl...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2013 11:09 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: How to get a clean working tree for flex-sdk
Humm, no idea, could you show me your /.git/config ?
-Fred
-Message d'origine-
From: Gordon S
webdoubl...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2013 11:09 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: How to get a clean working tree for flex-sdk
Humm, no idea, could you show me your /.git/config ?
-Fred
-Message d'origine-
From: Gordon Smith
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2013 8:01 PM
To: d
Humm, no idea, could you show me your /.git/config ?
-Fred
-Message d'origine-
From: Gordon Smith
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2013 8:01 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: RE: How to get a clean working tree for flex-sdk
If my repo is not up to date, why does doing "git p
v@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: How to get a clean working tree for flex-sdk
Gordon,
Check
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/Git+for+Apache+Flex+Guide
for your .gitconfig
Your repo is not up to date as I can see from your .gitignore, do a git reset
--hard HEAD followed by a git pull
d'origine-
From: Gordon Smith
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2013 7:12 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: RE: How to get a clean working tree for flex-sdk
When I have time, I'll investigate whether the unexpected output from 'git
status' is a result of also building flex-falcon
jar
*.swf
*.swc
#Compressed Files
*.zip
*.rar
*.tar
-Original Message-
From: Frédéric THOMAS [mailto:webdoubl...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2013 1:27 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: How to get a clean working tree for flex-sdk
And your /.gitignore too ?
Thanks,
And your /.gitignore too ?
Thanks,
-Fred
-Message d'origine-
From: Frédéric THOMAS
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2013 10:24 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: How to get a clean working tree for flex-sdk
Gordon,
It looks like your repo is not updated or your config is messy
Gordon,
It looks like your repo is not updated or your config is messy.
Can you show up your /.gitconfig please ?
Thanks,
-Fred
-Message d'origine-
From: Gordon Smith
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2013 6:24 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: How to get a clean working tree for flex-sdk
Hmm. I did a pull and build and those don't show up. Not sure why that's
happening for you.
On 4/2/13 9:37 PM, "Gordon Smith" wrote:
> Yes, I did a pull of the develop branch to get current.
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On Apr 2, 2013, at 9:30 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>
>> "not stages" is lik
Yes, I did a pull of the develop branch to get current.
Sent from my iPad
On Apr 2, 2013, at 9:30 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
> "not stages" is like SVN saying a file is modified.
>
> "untracked" is like SVN saying a file is unversioned (not added to SVN).
>
> I'd be curious as to what did change
"not stages" is like SVN saying a file is modified.
"untracked" is like SVN saying a file is unversioned (not added to SVN).
I'd be curious as to what did change in flex-config and Version.java. I
thought Fred cleaned up the rest. Did you do a git pull to get synced up
(like svn update).
On
62 matches
Mail list logo
