Re: git commit: [flex-sdk] [refs/heads/develop] - FLEX-34108 add toJSON to ArrayCollection and ArrayList

As to the "worth": what is the cost, really? I mean, it's not really likely this will be called from a long loop, so that one comparison probably is "worth it". I also like how it's self documenting the issue. EdB On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 9:18 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > This works - b

Re: [FlexJS] TileLayout.js errors

These were JSHint errors; the other linter we use ;-) EdB On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 4:08 PM, Peter Ent wrote: > Before I committed this code I ran it through gjshint without an errors or > warnings. So why did this happen now? Seems flaky to me. > --peter > > On 2/22/14 4:

Re: [FLEXJS] IDE integration discussion

through IntelliJ ticket, in > > parallel with my tries to get a initial environment for develop FlexJS > > > > Thanks > > > > Carlos > > > > > > 2014-02-24 10:01 GMT+01:00 Erik de Bruin : > > > > > > >> > 1) The thread

Re: [FLEXJS] IDE integration discussion

ataBindingTest/bin/js-debug/controllers/MyController.js > > [java] Compiling file: > > > /Users/aharui/git/flex/master/flex-asjs/examples/DataBindingTest/bin/js-debug/MyInitialView.js > > > > -Alex > > ________ > > From: ca

Re: flex-sdk_mustella - Build # 745 - Failure!

There was at least one RTE in the Flash Player during this run. I was in a hurry, so I did a "Dismiss All" on the dialog and let the run continue. Please hold all panic until another run has passed or failed. Thanks, EdB On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 7:18 AM, wrote: > flex-sdk_mustella - Build #

Re: [DISCUSSION] Apache Flex 4.12.0 release candidate 2

Before I go and test the RC, a question: Were the 4.12 and develop branches in sync when the RC was cut? If they were, the Mustella failure seems to scream "-1" at this RC. A thought: why not follow guidelines for version control and NOT merge changes from develop into an RC branch? That way that

Re: [DISCUSSION] Apache Flex 4.12.0 release candidate 2

> > > A thought: why not follow guidelines for version control and NOT merge > > changes from develop into an RC branch? > Because: > - Changes were made in develop that were needed in the release branch > - Only the release branch is tested so for a RC to be tested it must be in > sync with develo

Re: [FlexJS] SVG based TextButton and example checked in

1. I can add a file copy pass to the publish operation of the compiler easily enough, but we need to discuss the best option: - copy all 'non-JS and non-CSS' files, whether or not they are actually used - copy only the files that belong to classes that are actually used (would require strict na

Re: Please provide EOL & EOVS dates of Flex SDK 4.6

Hi, I think EOVS was the moment they donated to Apache. As to EOL: Apache Flex 4.8 is a parity release of Adobe Flex 4.6 (i.e. the same code, new owner) and since the source of 4.8 will remain available as long as the Apache organisation exists, I think you can safely say that it has a long life

Re: [FlexJS] SVG based TextButton and example checked in

> > > 1. I can add a file copy pass to the publish operation of the compiler > > easily enough, but we need to discuss the best option: > > - copy all 'non-JS and non-CSS' files, whether or not they are actually > > used > > - copy only the files that belong to classes that are actually used >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Flex 4.12.0 RC 2

> > So, technically, I think I have to vote -1 because we need another RC with > My thoughts exactly. EdB -- Ix Multimedia Software Jan Luykenstraat 27 3521 VB Utrecht T. 06-51952295 I. www.ixsoftware.nl

Re: [VOTE] Apache Flex 4.12.0 RC 2

I thought the votes carrying over was meant to allow for expedited release of a new RC if only minimal changes were made against the previous one, like README changes or simple configs? Are you saying you will carry over +1s when there were changes made to the RC that caused Mustella failures, whi

Re: [VOTE] Apache Flex 4.12.0 RC 2

> > I don't see any issue here. > Yeah. That worries me. What worries me more is that people vote +1 when the Mustella tests are failing. And what worries me even more is that people keep on voting +1 on an what is clearly not a valid RC anymore. Guess all that just makes me a worrier. Carry on.

Re: [FlexJS] SVG based TextButton and example checked in

> > Just curious, how to other apps using GCC include their assets? > GCC is 'just' to compile and optimise one or more JavaScript files into one. Publishing it and the assets it requires is done either manually (through an FTP client or whatever) or via tools such as an dedicated IDE. > I sugges

Re: FlexJS build broken

Hi Carlos, Thank you for your patience. You were right to hold off on that 'fix'. I specifically didn't use dot notation for these properties because that would allow the Closure Compiler to rename them. Since these properties are called from outside code, we don't want that to happen. I could've

Re: FlexJS build broken

Ok, I've made the error go away ;-) EdB On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 8:35 AM, Erik de Bruin wrote: > Hi Carlos, > > Thank you for your patience. You were right to hold off on that 'fix'. I > specifically didn't use dot notation for these properties because that &g

Re: FlexJS build broken

Ah, as to why I didn't get the error in the first place: I ran ant on a specific example, not the ant in root. I guess the example ants don't lint. EdB On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 8:53 AM, Erik de Bruin wrote: > Ok, I've made the error go away ;-) > > EdB > > >

Re: FlexJS build broken

1:54 PM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote: > > >Ah, as to why I didn't get the error in the first place: I ran ant on a > >specific example, not the ant in root. I guess the example ants don't > >lint. > In theory, there is no JS to lint in the examples folder becau

Re: [FlexJS] SVG based TextButton and example checked in

> > This got cut off so I'm not sure what your thoughts were. I'm not a huge > fan of MetaData but we will have it in FlexJS > We already have significant metadata in FlexJS... Each class has a FLEXJS_CLASS_INFO member that is basically pure metadata and contains information about the class itsel

Re: [VOTE] Apache Flex 4.12.0 RC4

+1 (binding) OS X 10.9.2 - signatures match - docs OK - rat OK - build and checkintests OK - big(-ish) apps build fine (using FB) Windows 2008 Server: - Mustella passed virtually cleanly for the last 4 runs of all three suites (main, mobile and air); twice a single test failed, but both tim

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.0 - RC4

+1 (binding) OS X 10.9.2 - signatures match - application builds fine from source using README as guide - 4.12.0 (RC4) installs nicely - FlexJS installs nicely -> and, after setting up FB - as per the Wiki, three easy steps - flawlessly compiles the ASJS examples to functional HTML/JS! - nl_NL lo

Re: New Article about FlexJS

Maybe we can add a Google translate link like this one for non-Spanish speakers: http://translate.google.com/translate?sl=es&tl=en&u=http%3A//www.madeinflex.com/arquitectura-de-componentes-en-flexjs-strands-y-beads/ ? EdB On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 8:00 PM, Nicholas Kwiatkowski wrote: > Done.

Re: New Article about FlexJS

me, messes up all the formatting. > > -Sean Thayne > > > On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 12:14 PM, Erik de Bruin wrote: > > > Maybe we can add a Google translate link like this one for non-Spanish > > speakers: > > > > > > > http://translate.google.co

Re: FlexJS compiler support for FDT

Hi, I've updated the PowerFlasher JIRA ticket about the FlexJS integration: http://bugs.powerflasher.com/jira/browse/FDT-3281 Thanks, EdB On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 9:48 AM, Erik de Bruin wrote: > Sorry about the delay, but the nightlies appear to be working again. > > Plea

Re: TextInput JS events

I'll try to have a look at this tomorrow. EdB On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 6:19 PM, Carlos Rovira wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to deal with events in JS and I'm finding some troubles. Maybe > you guys more experienced with google closure could help me to find the > way. > > In old Flex SDK, TextInpu

Re: TextInput JS events

Carlos, In your JS implementation I see you already set up a handler that catches "input" events and re-casts them as "change" events. This seems like a perfectly acceptable solution to this issue and much more clean and intuitive than trying to get the AS side to emit "input" instead of change, a

Re: TextInput JS events

as possible and not going to map JS > 'input' event. FlexJS users would expect CHANGE to work as they do in > traditional Flex. > > I'm this morning out, but I'd like to get it back to this issue this night. > > Thanks Erik for take the time to see this since y

Re: TextInput JS events

As a first try, I'd suggest you rename the "event" package to something less collision prone, like "events"... EdB On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 1:29 PM, Erik de Bruin wrote: > Carlos, > > I'm currently looking at the example application. You use 'eve

Re: TextInput JS events

I'll make the change later as I get some time for FlexJS. > > Thanks! > > > > > > 2014-03-06 13:41 GMT+01:00 Erik de Bruin : > > > As a first try, I'd suggest you rename the "event" package to something > > less collision prone, like "

[FlexJS] FDT responds to latest developments

Hi, I just got a response to my earlier bump to the FDT devs (in below). Maybe someone can address these points, as I'm not familiar with the FlexJS SDK construction by the Installer, nor the inner workings of the AS side of the FlexJS SDK... Hi Erik de Bruin, I was able to create the F

Re: TextInput JS events

der having FalconJX flatten the packages > (org_apache_flex_TextInput instead of org.apache.flex.TextInput) because > it looks up faster in JS. And I think that would prevent this problem as > well? > > Thoughts? > > -Alex > > On 3/6/14 5:31 AM, "Erik de Bruin" w

Re: Should we release 4.12?

Nick, I think you hit the sweet spot. +1 on the stealth release now and a noisy announcement when the new Installer is available. EdB On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 1:48 PM, Nicholas Kwiatkowski wrote: > I say we "release" it but not make the announcements. By release, I mean > update the website,

Re: 4.12 Release

The top gfx on the site still show "Apache Flex (r) SDK 4.11 now available!" EdB On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 8:50 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > I've just updated the XML file and published the site live. > > Before I make the public announcement can people check that everything is > good to

Re: flex-sdk_mustella - Build # 770 - Failure!

Don't panic! This is me downsizing the VM to keep it within my "Azure credits" limit. EdB On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 8:44 AM, wrote: > flex-sdk_mustella - Build # 770 - Failure: > > http://flex-mustella.cloudapp.net/job/flex-sdk_mustella/770/ > > Changes for Build #770 > [jmclean] Changed vers

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.0 - RC7

Alex, This is just you trying to beat the record Om and I set with the first release of the installer, right? 7 down, 3 to go... ;-) EdB On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 6:21 AM, Alex Harui wrote: > This is the discussion thread. > > This RC contains lots of small changes to try to handle inabilit

Re: [FLEXJS} Musing about Mustella

Yes, we very much need to be able to test against various browsers (both old - IE8 comes to mind - and new). Any solution that doesn't allow automated testing against multiple browsers on multiple platforms seems a less optimal choice. The various JS, CSS and maybe SVG implementations just differ t

Re: [FLEXJS} Musing about Mustella

> > The MXML test script should be valid XML, so it should be easily parsed by > Java code. We have to figure out what to do with any fx:Script block, but > otherwise, maybe each MXML tag just runs a Java class? For MXML event > handling code in AS, maybe that just gets passed to JS eval()? Or >

Re: svn commit: r901170 - in /websites/production/flex: cgi-bin/ content/

As long as you didn't push from staging to live, I don't think you need to revert. Just look for a fix and test on staging. Only when all is well, push the changes to the live site. EdB On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 8:39 AM, piotr.zarzycki wrote: > Hi Om. > > Thanks and sorry about that. I'm fighti

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.0 - RC7

Are we carrying over votes for this release as well? If not, here is mine - again, but this time for RC7: +1 (binding) OS X 10.9.2 - signatures match - application builds fine from source using README as guide - 4.12.0 installs nicely - FlexJS installs nicely -> and, after setting up FB - as per

Re: [FLEXJS} Musing about Mustella

Can you give an example of what AS might be in the test descriptor file? EdB On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 2:37 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > > > On 3/12/14 12:34 AM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote: > > >> > >> The MXML test script should be valid XML, so it should be

Re: [FLEXJS} Musing about Mustella

e's a good chance that just about all of the AS is essentially just > JS. We can say not to define new classes or use "for each" and other non > JS stuff, and even fully qualify classes if that makes things easier. > > -Alex > > On 3/12/14 6:44 AM, "Erik de Bruin&

Re: flex-sdk_mustella - Build # 775 - Failure!

Can't we just disable this test? It doesn't have an accurate outcome anyway, so we've taken to ignoring it's failure as it tends to go away... EdB On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 5:37 PM, wrote: > flex-sdk_mustella - Build # 775 - Failure: > > http://flex-mustella.cloudapp.net/job/flex-sdk_mustella/

Re: More Musings about Mustella/Marmotinni

> > I spent most of today trying to understand Selenium. I assume we want to > use Selenium 2 (WebDriver)? > Yes, we do ;-) The Marmotinni source has build files that set up the test environment. > I started porting the Mustella AS test steps to Java and ran into an > interesting problem: Muste

Re: Jenkins and Flash Player Debugger

I see that both the build runs OK again and you have a request out to builds@a.o. Is there anything I can help with? EdB On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 6:08 AM, Alex Harui wrote: > On 3/12/14 8:56 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote: > >It should run fine. Mustella, sdk checkintests, etc. have been

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: flex-asjs #196

Re-running "flex-falcon" build. Seems this build stumbled over a previously failed run of that build. EdB On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Apache Jenkins Server < jenk...@builds.apache.org> wrote: > See > > --

Re: flex-sdk_mustella-mobile - Build # 587 - Still Failing!

This is something worth looking at... We don't get 305 failures often! EdB On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 1:29 PM, wrote: > flex-sdk_mustella-mobile - Build # 587 - Still Failing: > > http://flex-mustella.cloudapp.net/job/flex-sdk_mustella-mobile/587/ > > Changes for Build #586 > [bigosmallm] Fix f

Re: Top 5 highest demands on Flex

Om, It seems you have a team! EdB On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 7:22 AM, Deepak MS wrote: > I too can do my bit for skinning. > Do let me know when to pitch in. > > Cheers! > > > On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 11:07 AM, wrote: > > > I'll definitely volunteer for developing skins and components for Droi

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.0 - RC7

Why don't you cary over the votes from the previous RCs (like Justin does with the SDK releases) and see what the tally is then? EdB On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 6:26 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > 72 hours is passed and we have: > > 1 +1 binding vote (Erik) > 1 +0 binding vote (Maurice) > 1 +1 non-bind

Re: flex-sdk_mustella - Build # 781 - Failure!

This is likely one of the intermittent errors, not tied to a fix/change of the SDK. EdB On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 11:38 AM, wrote: > flex-sdk_mustella - Build # 781 - Failure: > > http://flex-mustella.cloudapp.net/job/flex-sdk_mustella/781/ > > Changes for Build #781 > [maurice.amsellem] FIXED

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.0 - RC7

I'm with Om. Call 3.0. Any issues (incorrectly) building from source will probably not happen that often in the wild, as this is realistically speaking a utility for which even devs will download the binaries. EdB On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 7:49 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala wrote: > On Mar 15, 2014 1

Re: Draft email to committers

Let's not discuss this to death, please. I very much like Justin's proposal. I think that he can sign on behalf of the PMC, as it is one of the PMC's duties to try to get as much people to contribute to the project as possible. As a PMC member you can't be against an effort to get people to contri

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.0 - RC7

80+%? Do you have a reference for that number? I'm not in the US, and I didn't see the issue... EdB On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 8:32 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > So everyone who voted +1 is willing to support out the 80+% of user who > are effect by the locale issue? > > Justin -- Ix

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.0 - RC7

> > Official Apache releases are source only, the binaries are just a > connivence nothing more. That's not a really helpful - and very unnecessary - reminder, as it doesn't change anything, does it? There are no (known) issues with building the source. So all we're talking about are issues with

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.0 - RC7

> > > Is it a problem with the Installer or with SDK 4.12? > It's a problem with the installer ant file in the 4.12 released SDK I > believe. Lok like ALex may of just corrected the issue. > So, this issue can apparently be fixed by a new SDK release, not a new Installer RC. If I understand that c

Re: Draft email to committers

> > it is one of the PMC's duties to try to get as much people to >> contribute to the project as possible. >> > Are you sure? > I do not see that listed anywhere in Apache's PMC Guidelines: > https://www.apache.org/dev/pmc.html You are kidding, right? If "proper management and oversight" doe

Re: Draft email to committers

> Let's not discuss this to death, please. > Well... I'm very sorry I was right :-( What's wrong that we can't even agree on a simple email asking people to help out - the essence of an Open Source project? EdB -- Ix Multimedia Software Jan Luykenstraat 27 3521 VB Utrecht T. 06-51952295 I

Re: Draft email to committers

> > What's wrong that we can't even agree on a simple email asking people to >> > Nothing is wrong. Geeks are just not normally very good at expressing > themselves and can easily take things the wrong way. Like you calling me a "Geek"? You *&%@#&*&#$! EdB P.S. :-P (just in case something got

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: flex-sdk #677

Yeah... The builds@ admin were notified of the other problems with 'windows1' more than a week (2 weekends) ago... We need to figure out how to get our own admin account on that machine, as we seem to be one of the few project to actively use that slave. I've offered to help out a few times, both o

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: flex-sdk #677

my sanity ;-) Have fun, EdB On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 7:24 PM, Maurice Amsellem < maurice.amsel...@systar.com> wrote: > > but they don't seem inclined to accept any help that might improve their > service > > Erik, I love your sense of sarcasm ;-) > &

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: flex-sdk #699

Guess it doesn't :-( I find myself very disappointed and frustrated again with builds@a.o. Does anybody have any ideas how we might improve their responsiveness? Maybe we can bribe them with something? EdB On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 3:46 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > Either the admins finally got ar

Re: [FlexJS] Checkintest now runs on both AS and JS

Alex, I'm trying to keep up with developments, and I'll jump in when I have a few cycles, hopefully in the next few days. EdB On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 8:05 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > Hi folks, > > I just checked in changes to flex-falcon and flex-asjs so that the > checkintests target in flex-a

Re: [FlexJS] Tasks before first Release Candidate

> > 1) Do some package reorganization: Currently most components are in > org.apache.flex.html.staticControls. However these controls aren't quite > so static, so I'm thinking of removing the staticControls folder and > flattening the hierarchy by one level. > All for it. Be sure to "freeze the

Please go vote for INFRA ticket

Hi, https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-7488 Currently, most if not all our CI builds are failing due to (apparently) config issues on the server. The people at builds@a.o and INFRA don't seem to appreciate the importance to this project of a rapid solution, even after repeated message tr

Re: Please go vote for INFRA ticket

It shouldn't be this difficult. This is wasting our time. A restart fixes most issues most of the time... How hard can it be to give one of us any one of the 7 admin slots that are currently not used on 'windows1'? That way we can manage this for ourselves, saving both us AND the admins time. I an

Re: flex-sdk_mustella - Build # 805 - Failure!

Rebooting the VM after switch to 'large' instance. EdB On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 7:35 AM, wrote: > flex-sdk_mustella - Build # 805 - Failure: > > http://flex-mustella.cloudapp.net/job/flex-sdk_mustella/805/ > > Changes for Build #804 > [bigosmallm] Fix for https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse

Re: flex-sdk_mustella-mobile - Build # 614 - Still Failing!

This is not one of the "regular" failures... Anyone have an idea what may have gone wrong? EdB On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 6:02 PM, wrote: > flex-sdk_mustella-mobile - Build # 614 - Still Failing: > > http://flex-mustella.cloudapp.net/job/flex-sdk_mustella-mobile/614/ > > Changes for Build #613

Re: Please go vote for INFRA ticket

> > Not sure whats on builds.apache.org. Only Admins can reliably find out > the > version info. > I found this in the footer of the Jenkins page: Jenkins ver. 1.558-SNAPSHOT (private-03/25/2014 21:10 GMT-jenkins) EdB -- Ix Multimedia Software Jan Luykenstraat 27 35

Re: Setting up Flex SDK for development

This thread [1] from the archives might come in handy. I don't think all the information in there made it into the Wiki, but there is some information in there as well. EdB 1: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/flex-dev/201307.mbox/%3c853dd4e8-18ae-4a31-9373-39e8fd77d...@classsoftware.com%3

Re: flex-sdk_mustella-mobile - Build # 621 - Failure!

Any chance this is related to a recent commit? EdB On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 6:36 PM, wrote: > flex-sdk_mustella-mobile - Build # 621 - Failure: > > http://flex-mustella.cloudapp.net/job/flex-sdk_mustella-mobile/621/ > > Changes for Build #621 > [maurice.amsellem] FIXED - FLEX-24502 Mobile opt

Time to move the CI builds to a "private" VM?

Hi, Given the apparently total lack of support from INFRA and builds@a.o for a git based CI process on a Windows slave, isn't it time to start thinking about providing our own VM and running the Jenkins jobs off that? I would gladly donate my Azure VM for this purpose, but as Mustella runs on it

Re: Time to move the CI builds to a "private" VM?

a.o for > a git based CI process on a Windows slave > > Because it's git or because it's windows ? > > Maurice > > -Message d'origine- > De : Erik de Bruin [mailto:e...@ixsoftware.nl] > Envoyé : lundi 31 mars 2014 08:46 > À : dev@flex.apache.org

Re: Time to move the CI builds to a "private" VM?

Message d'origine- > De : Erik de Bruin [mailto:e...@ixsoftware.nl] > Envoyé : lundi 31 mars 2014 09:22 > À : dev@flex.apache.org > Objet : Re: Time to move the CI builds to a "private" VM? > > I have no idea, but we've been trying to get someone - anyone

Re: Time to move the CI builds to a "private" VM?

> > > Ok, I wasn't sure if we clone something that does all builds whether > that would take you over the free limit. > > Sent via the PANTECH Discover, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone. > > > The cost is incurred only when the jobs are run (i.e. for CPU usage). If > we have enough committers bring thei

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: flex-sdk_release #542

Well, OK then. The tinkering of INFRA seems to have solved most of the problems with the builds on the CI machine. Only the 'release' job fails, and that seems related to the checkintests, NOT something git/Jenkins... Anyone have any idea what's up with this? EdB On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 3:15 P

Jenkins jobs cleanup

Om, I think you created all the jobs postfixed with '_1' on the windows1 slave? Now the builds seem to be running OK again, is it save to remove those jobs? EdB -- Ix Multimedia Software Jan Luykenstraat 27 3521 VB Utrecht T. 06-51952295 I. www.ixsoftware.nl

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: flex-sdk_release #542

w media query. > > -Alex > > From: Erik de Bruin [e...@ixsoftware.nl] > Sent: Tuesday, April 1, 2014 6:25 AM > To: dev@flex.apache.org > Subject: Re: Build failed in Jenkins: flex-sdk_release #542 > > Well, OK then. The tinkering of I

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: flex-sdk_release #542

Maurice > > -----Message d'origine- > De : Erik de Bruin [mailto:e...@ixsoftware.nl] > Envoyé : mardi 1 avril 2014 17:36 > À : dev@flex.apache.org > Objet : Re: Build failed in Jenkins: flex-sdk_release #542 > > Grep can only find one instance of 'trace' in &

Re: Jenkins build is back to normal : flex-sdk #741

We're all good on all builds. Thanks to everyone who put time and effort - and patience with INFRA quirks - into fixing the recent troubles! EdB On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 7:11 PM, Apache Jenkins Server < jenk...@builds.apache.org> wrote: > See > >

Re: Time for Change

Thank you, Greg! If I ever were to start my own project, I'd want to have you as my mentor. EdB On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 6:56 AM, Alex Harui wrote: > Yes, definitely thanks, and good to know you'll still help us on private@ > > -Alex > > From: Justin M

Re: flex-sdk_mustella - Build # 821 - Failure!

Oh no, somebody broke our baby again! EdB On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 5:20 AM, wrote: > flex-sdk_mustella - Build # 821 - Failure: > > http://flex-mustella.cloudapp.net/job/flex-sdk_mustella/821/ > > Changes for Build #821 > [maurice.amsellem] DONE FLEX-33994 Need a way to distinguish phone and >

Re: Jenkins jobs cleanup

> On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 9:44 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala >wrote: > > > Yes it is safe to remove them. I can do it later today if you don't get > to > > it before me. > > > > Thanks, > > Om > > On Apr 1, 2014 6:28 AM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote

Re: Apache Subversion moving to... Git

I had flashbacks; their pain felt real to me. PTSD, I guess... ;-) EdB On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 10:00 AM, Tom Chiverton wrote: > On 02/04/14 02:35, OmPrakash Muppirala wrote: > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-7524 >> >> Who can blame them? ;-) >> >> >> Had a heart attack readi

Re: flex-sdk_mustella - Build # 821 - Failure!

ot; width:", deviceWidth, " height: ", deviceHeight, " > diag:", flexDeviceDiagonal); > > > > Maurice > > > > > > *De :* Erik de Bruin [mailto:e...@ixsoftware.nl] > *Envoyé :* mercredi 2 avril 2014 08:18 > *À :* dev@flex.apache

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: flex-sdk #744

Here we go again :-( EdB On Saturday, April 5, 2014, Apache Jenkins Server wrote: > See > > -- > Started by timer > Building remotely on windows1 (Windows) in workspace < > https://builds.apache.org/job/flex

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: flex-sdk #744

I'm looking at it now... EdB On Sun, Apr 6, 2014 at 7:44 AM, Alex Harui wrote: > Did you see the note about how to do a clean checkout? Is that worth a > try? > > -Alex > > On 4/5/14 10:23 AM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote: > > >Here we go again :-( >

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: flex-sdk #744

n those machines :-( EdB On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 3:51 PM, Erik de Bruin wrote: > I'm looking at it now... > > EdB > > > > > On Sun, Apr 6, 2014 at 7:44 AM, Alex Harui wrote: > >> Did you see the note about how to do a clean checkout? Is that worth a >&

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: flex-sdk #744

So far, so good, the 'flex-sdk' job and it's dependants ran fine. Now let's see if the new setting will keep it running fine... EdB On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 4:16 PM, Erik de Bruin wrote: > I've made the suggested change to the 'flex-sdk' job, but as bot

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: flex-sdk #749

Same error as before, but this time it's with the "delete and clean pull" option enabled. I think there is something wrong with the git install on the slave, but that's a wild guess. Back to INFRA, I'm afraid. EdB On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 3:27 PM, Apache Jenkins Server < jenk...@builds.apache.or

Re: [VOTE] Apache Flex FlexUnit 4.2.0 RC4

+0.5 (binding) - sigs good - docs look good, although my legalese is a bit rusty - build OK - and this is where the reason for the half vote comes in: I've never worked with FlexUnit, so I can't test the functionality of the package... EdB On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 12:23 AM, Justin Mclean wrote

Re: [VOTE] Apache Flex FlexUnit 4.2.0 RC4

Moving this to [DISCUSS] to keep thread clean. EdB On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 8:01 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for voting. What platform did you compile it on? > > > - and this is where the reason for the half vote comes in: I've never > > worked with FlexUnit, so I can't test the

Re: [DISCUSSION] Release Apache Flex FlexUnit 4.2.0 RC4

I'm on OS X (10.9.2) I've just ran 'ant package' and it failed with this error: "Basedir /Users/erik/Desktop/apache-flex-flexunit-4.2.0-4.12.0-src/FlexUnit4Test does not exist" Guess the other half of my vote isn't earned yet by this release, as a matter of fact - if it's not me doing stuff wron

Re: [DISCUSSION] Release Apache Flex FlexUnit 4.2.0 RC4

Just made a clone of the repo and ran 'ant thirdparty-downloads' in the FlexUnit4 dir, then 'ant' on the root dir, before trying 'ant package'... Which failed: "The provided 'swf' property value points to a remote location. Please set localTrusted = false or change the location of your swf to a l

Re: [DISCUSSION] Release Apache Flex FlexUnit 4.2.0 RC4

Didn't make the slightest difference. Just switched to 'release4.2.0' branch and ran all three ant targets again (as described above). The 'package' task still fails with: "The provided 'swf' property value points to a remote location. Please set localTrusted = false or change the location of you

Re: [DISCUSSION] Release Apache Flex FlexUnit 4.2.0 RC4

> > All of those ant command should be run from the top level directory (and > none in FlexUnit4 sub directory) but you can get away with just an "ant > clean" and "ant package". > When I run the 'ant thirdparty-downloads' task from the top level directory (as the README seems to indicate) it giv

Re: [DISCUSSION] Release Apache Flex FlexUnit 4.2.0 RC4

Running 'ant package' a second time, with nothing changed etc. etc. SUCCEEDS, weirdly enough... Your choice: I'll gladly change my vote to +1 as the code seems to work as advertised, eventually ;-) EdB On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Erik de Bruin wrote: > All of those

Re: [DISCUSSION] Release Apache Flex FlexUnit 4.2.0 RC4

> > > Target "thirdparty-download" does not exist in the project "FlexUnit4". > Typo in my email, not my command line ;-) > Also, when I run 'ant clean' in the top level dir, I get a whole bunch of > > this error. > > Looks like you don't have ant contrib set up as part of ant and yes that > is

Re: [VOTE] Apache Flex FlexUnit 4.2.0 RC4

Changing my vote to: +1 (binding) See [DISCUSS] for details. EdB On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 7:45 AM, Erik de Bruin wrote: > +0.5 (binding) > > - sigs good > - docs look good, although my legalese is a bit rusty > - build OK > - and this is where the reason for the half v

Re: [DISCUSSION] Release Apache Flex FlexUnit 4.2.0 RC4

> > JFYI just doing "ant" will make something useful that you can use. If I were to take your word for that, you might as well vote for me ;-) EdB -- Ix Multimedia Software Jan Luykenstraat 27 3521 VB Utrecht T. 06-51952295 I. www.ixsoftware.nl

Re: flex-sdk_mustella-mobile - Build # 650 - Still Failing!

This test: mobile/ViewAndViewNavigator/tests/ViewAndViewNavigator_persistence customObjectPersistence Failed AssertMethodValue (method cannot be shown)(body:step 2) method returned false, expected true is now consistently failing every time the 'mobile' suite is run. This seems to indicate a reg

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Apache Flex FalconJX 0.0.1 RC1

I agree. As long as the release is properly marked as Alpha quality and with a version number that indicates the same - 0.01 will do ;-) - everyone will know to not rely on this for major mission critical enterprise applications. I'll get on testing as soon as I get these pesky clients off my back

<    2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   >