I put in a param a while ago (used for testing) called '-marmotinni'; if
you specify that with a file location following, FalconJX should output the
JS to that directory instead of the default location...
I've not tried this directly from the command line, only from the test
platform's ant file, s
This is a very dedicated community indeed... Even on [LAZY] votes everyone
turns out and votes +1
;-)
EdB
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 12:02 PM, wrote:
> +1
>
> -Mark
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
> Sent: Monday, April 14, 2014 5:19 PM
> To: dev@flex.
Hi,
I'm looking at the functional tests for the Falcon compiler. Only one test
fails, the one for "flash-integration". The error is:
Error: unable to open '/Applications/Adobe Flash Builder 4.7/sdks/4.12.0
(FP 11.1)/frameworks/projects/flash-integration/compile-config.xml'.
I just downloaded a cl
Don't forget the thongs... never forget the thongs
Oh god, help me forget those thongs!
EdB
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 12:46 PM, wrote:
> Well shirts and logos are a great break from filing taxes all weekend :P
>
> -Mark
>
> -Original Message-----
> From:
I think I have resolved FLEX-34224.
EdB
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Steffi wrote:
> Hi Om,
>
> I have added two tickets. Please take a look:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-34224
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-34225
>
> And I can confrim I am working on FDT.
>
om: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
> >Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2014 9:16 AM
> >To: dev@flex.apache.org
> >Subject: Re: [LAZY] Apache Flex and 360|Flex shirts
> >
> >
> >
> >On 4/15/14 3:56 AM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote:
> >
> >>
Why do you insist on adding '.0' to the version numbers used by Adobe? They
made it very clear they will only be doing 'major' version release numbers
from now on (and up the build number if they need an intermediate update or
security release).
The Mustella VM has been running against the '13' ve
Nope, because as far as I can see the release versions haven't been
released yet ;-)
The last announcement I saw was about the availability of beta build 199
[1][2].
EdB
1: http://forums.adobe.com/community/labs/flashruntimes/flashplayer/
2: http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/flashruntimes/flash
Nothing.
If you run a "medium" instance, it will be more than plenty powerful to do
all build tasks whenever needed. And with the "free credits" that come with
the committer MSDN licences you can run a "medium" instance for about 1.5
months every month ;-)
EdB
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 8:45 PM,
Max 10 - 20 Euros.
EdB
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 8:56 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> Erik,
>
> If you didn't switch over to medium during the month, what do you think
> you'd end up paying each month?
>
> -Alex
>
> On 4/17/14 11:49 AM, "Erik de Bruin&quo
At "large", an instance runs at about $5 a day. You get something like $150
a month, so can't run over the free part all that much.
EdB
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 9:00 PM, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> Max 10 - 20 Euros.
>
> EdB
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 a
t. I assume we really do want to run some sanity tests for each
> build, yes?
>
> -Alex
>
> On 4/17/14 12:00 PM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote:
>
> >Max 10 - 20 Euros.
> >
> >EdB
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 8
For the record, I'm with Alex.
We have "alpha quality release" pasted all over the place. It's not unusual
for Alpha versions to only work on specific use cases (like for sneak
previews at conferences) and not for other cases, however simple and
(eventually) must have they are.
Let's test if this
>
> Justin's use case is very simple. This definitely should work with
> FlexJS.
>
The point is he's not testing it against the FlexJS SDK but the Flex SDK.
EdB
--
Ix Multimedia Software
Jan Luykenstraat 27
3521 VB Utrecht
T. 06-51952295
I. www.ixsoftware.nl
>
> > The point is he's not testing it against the FlexJS SDK but the Flex SDK.
>
> What in that dummy AS class has anything to do with the Flex SDK?
>
Ok, let me rephrase: Falcon is currently only meant to be used with FlexJS,
not as a standalone compiler. As your test indicates, it is not ready
'long term support' version of the players is
released, we'll have to figure out how to test against that and the latest
beta release together...
EdB
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 9:59 AM, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> Nope, because as far as I can see the release versions haven't bee
>
> > I guess I'll just keep the Mustella VM up to date with the latest beta,
> and
> > if some time in May the 'long term support' version of the players is
> > released
>
> It has been and it's FP 13 [1]. This was while it was still on labs, which
> is odd to say the least.
While I know you aus
+1 (binding)
EdB
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 10:42 AM, aYo ~ wrote:
> +1
> aYo
>
> ~a~
> www.ayobinitie.com
> http://mrbinitie.blogspot.com
>
>
> On 18 April 2014 08:14, Maurice Amsellem >wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > De : Alex Harui [aha...@adobe.com]
> > Env
Welcome to my frustration ;-)
I'm probably naive, but I think our VMs are pretty secure. We're running on
Azure, we are fully patched on all the software we use (Win2008, Apache
Server, Java, Jenkins and the various players) and we expose a minimal
attach surface (ports, access controls etc.). I'd
Alex,
I may be able to free up some time this week to (help) create the CI VM.
"All" I need are your Azure account credentials, so I can set up the VM,
after which I can use RDP to set up the software for the builds.
Free from 'builds@a.o', free at last!
EdB
On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 6:56 AM,
Just CI and nightlies, to replace 'builds@a.o'.
Then if that is working reliably, we can start experimenting with your plan
to add more Mustella nodes...
EdB
On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 7:48 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala
wrote:
> On Apr 20, 2014 10:24 AM, "Erik de Bruin&quo
+1 (binding)
- sigs good
- docs meager, but seem OK
- 'ant all' target completes successfully (i.e. source builds and all tests
pass)
I'll go with Justin on this one and add that these aren't release quality
bits, but I think it is a good move to release early and (hopefully) often,
getting this
+1 (binding)
- sigs OK
- docs meagre but OK
- source builds
- DataBindingTest good for both SWF and JS
Alpha, but already excellent!
EdB
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 2:43 AM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> NOTICE, LICENCE, RELEASE_NOTE all OK (very minor formatting/line length
>
Let's not make every discussion on this list about bylaws and regulations.
If I find time, I'll build the VM and finally get the CI nightmare that
Apache itself provides behind me. If the lawyers decide that the Apache
servers are better than the VM (lol) then we won't serve nightlies from the
VM,
gt; or so this evening.
>
> Feel free to change just about anything.
>
> Thanks,
> -Alex
>
> On 4/20/14 11:46 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
>
> >On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Erik de Bruin
> >wrote:
> >
> >> Just CI and nightlies,
Not sure if appropriate, but the Apache Flex Wiki comes to mind. At least
there you can work together with the people in the know, and have your
stuff reviewed. When finished, one of the committers can probably take the
entire wiki entry as a patch and put it into the docs in the repo...
If you ag
014 at 11:17 AM, Erik de Bruin
> wrote:
>
> > Not sure if appropriate, but the Apache Flex Wiki comes to mind. At least
> > there you can work together with the people in the know, and have your
> > stuff reviewed. When finished, one of the committers can probably take
> t
Alex,
Can you use your magic to give Andrew some Wiki powers?
EdB
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 5:23 PM, Andrew Wetmore wrote:
> My account there is for cottage14 / Andrew Wetmore / and...@cottage14.com
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Erik de Bruin
> wrote:
>
> &
That indicates there is an issue with the config file...
EdB
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 1:22 PM, Maurice Amsellem <
maurice.amsel...@systar.com> wrote:
> In the Apache Flex installer badge, the download button is disabled:
> http://flex.apache.org/installer.html
>
> Maurice
>
> -Message d'or
Can we maybe have the 'official' Apache Flex Twitter account (and whatever
else for social media we have - LinkedIn, Facebook?) announce this as well?
EdB
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 7:34 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> The Apache Flex community is pleased to announce the initial (alpha)
> release of Ap
I was experimenting with passing -Dbuild.noprompt=true to the "ide.bat"
file, because during the runs I tried after copying the settings, the build
went into an endless loop about the BlazeDS download (really 'cool', check
the logs).
That experiment left one error message in the below log...
Just
s messing up the download server.
>
> -Alex
>
> On 4/24/14 12:45 PM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote:
>
> >I was experimenting with passing -Dbuild.noprompt=true to the "ide.bat"
> >file, because during the runs I tried after copying the settings, the
> >build
Thanks you Alex and Adobe!
EdB
On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 6:27 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> I've checked in everything in the donation. I was able to use some tools
> to quickly get the headers right and the IP cleared by the Incubator. The
> next step is for volunteers to work with
>
> I wasn't expecting us to push out the door a new release one week after
> the last :-)
>
Well, the first one was a 'parity' release, mostly. I think it would be a
big plus if we could do another release so soon after this one, as it shows
the bits are in active development!
Great job.
EdB
Isn't he just making an official release available in a different
format/through a different channel?
EdB
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 6:30 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> As long as the snapshot is not promoted as a public release, I think you
> can go and create it without a vote process.
>
> On 4/29/1
Chris,
Let me know when you have BlazeDS building consistently on Windows. I'll
then create a CI job for it on our new server.
EdB
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 3:49 PM, Christofer Dutz
wrote:
> Ok ... I know I'm sort of having quite a monologue here, but I want this
> stuff logged ;-)
>
> Just di
>
> Are you sure we don't need to keep the Ant scripts? BlazeDS is going to
> be upstream of the Flex SDK.
> It might be nice if the rest of the SDK committers can debug BlazeDS
> issues without having to set up Maven?
>
+1, all Flex projects 'are' ant. Hopefully BlazeDS won't become an
exception
Lol, oops... I forgot to ask permission ;-)
I looked, but whomever was logged in was thinking the same way I was, so no
insights from me.
Out again.
EdB
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 9:28 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala wrote:
> On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 12:22 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
> > Om, Erik,
> >
> > E
en on that port (see Global Security).
> >>But
> >> >it didn't help.
> >> >
> >> >-Alex
> >> >
> >> >On 5/1/14 12:42 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala"
> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >>The slave is tryin
I'm sorry, something came up. The VM is available again.
EdB
On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> Ok, I'm taking another look...
>
> EdB
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 8:35 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>> Well, I've tried ever
Taking another look...
EdB
On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 1:29 PM, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> I'm sorry, something came up. The VM is available again.
>
> EdB
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Erik de Bruin wrote:
>
>> Ok, I'm taking another loo
e, but I've added rules
> that I think open up things and it hasn't made any difference.
>
> -Alex
>
> On 5/2/14 4:29 AM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote:
>
> >I'm sorry, something came up. The VM is available again.
> >
> >EdB
> >
>
ins UI.
EdB
On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 6:45 PM, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> I did ;-)
>
> Giving it another hour or so...
>
> EdB
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 6:41 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>> Did you just log in again? Someone booted me off, which is ok,
The Japanese lang test is failing since the version number was 'reverted'.
Who wants to take a look?
EdB
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 3:16 PM, wrote:
> flex-sdk_mustella - Build # 891 - Still Failing:
>
> http://flex-mustella.cloudapp.net/job/flex-sdk_mustella/891/
>
> Changes for Build #888
> [a
Yeah!
With the tests passing again, I can set up the FP/AIR 14 debug versions on
the Mustella machine.
EdB
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 1:07 AM, wrote:
> flex-sdk_mustella - Build # 910 - Fixed:
>
> http://flex-mustella.cloudapp.net/job/flex-sdk_mustella/910/
>
> Changes for Build #900
>
> Chang
This is weird... I just rebooted the system, and apparently that caused
this old email to be sent.
Don't panic, the runs for the SDK have been fine for some time now ;-)
EdB
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 9:21 PM, wrote:
> flex-sdk_mustella - Build # 902 - Still Failing:
>
> http://flex-mustella.cl
Ah, this must be caused by the Apache mail server slowly working through a
week of backlog emails.
EdB
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 7:19 AM, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> This is weird... I just rebooted the system, and apparently that caused
> this old email to be sent.
>
> Don't pa
I love it how the emails now seem to come in in the reverse order from
which they were sent in. First out, last in... should make for an
interesting guessing game for the next few weeks ;-)
EdB
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 6:59 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala
wrote:
> Cutting edge, as of 8 days ago ;-)
>
Let's please fix this!
We keep committing while Mustella is failing. Soon enough no one will know
who broke which tests!
EdB
On Monday, May 19, 2014, wrote:
> flex-sdk_mustella - Build # 921 - Still Failing:
>
> http://flex-mustella.cloudapp.net/job/flex-sdk_mustella/921/
>
> Changes for Bui
https://github.com/akamud/FlatSpark/blob/master/LICENSE
It has been released under the Apache License, which means it's OK for us
to use if we chose to, isn't it?
EdB
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 3:56 PM, Frédéric THOMAS wrote:
> There is already this one, someone talked about on the list and twi
Hi,
With the commit rate to the SDK picking up, it won't do to ignore the
failing tests. Several commits seem to have broken something, and it's
getting harder to tell which caused what...
I'm calling on all recent committers to look at the changes they submitted
and please fix what's causing the
Please fix the code or the tests (and any others in the full run that might
be broken by this change), or revert. I don't want to veto this, but
intentionally breaking Mustella is not a good way to make a point about a
fix...
EdB
On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 5:11 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
You have to go in to "chrome:plugins" and disable the Pepper version, then
install the regular version of the debugger. I'm typing from memory, so the
URI may be a bit off... Google is your friend with details ;-)
EdB
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 6:49 PM, mscharp wrote:
> Are there any flex devs
Very nice! I liked FlatSpark, I think I like BootFlat even more...
I would love to work with you to get either of these styles donated and
integrated in FlexJS.
EdB
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 3:51 PM, akamud wrote:
> I am one of the authors of FlatSpark and we are very happy with the
> communi
If you help out, it will get here faster...
:-)
EdB
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 4:44 PM, Vincent Sotto wrote:
> responsive boostrap theme like in flex, cant wait
>
>
> On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 10:32 PM, Erik de Bruin
> wrote:
>
> > Very nice! I liked FlatSpark, I th
Hi all,
I would like to take a look at what it would take to start implementing the
FlatSpark theme in FlexJS. You can have a look at this theme here:
https://github.com/akamud/FlatSpark
As you can see it is released under the Apache 2.0 license. Am I correct in
thinking that (especially with th
>
> >I imagine that this step is bureaucratic and I'll be away for a few
> >moments
> >of codes but no problems! It is a very important step and we're ready to
> >help!
> Yes, it is bureaucratic. Another question is whether you and akamud truly
> have ownership. Often, work done for a client is o
Actually, that sounds like the proper way to do it. The more actions we can
take out of the installer and into the scripts, the more control and
flexibility we gain.
+1
EdB
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 8:09 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
> We're seeing lots of complaints about bad downloads during the in
s all Mustella tests again.
Thanks,
EdB
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 8:48 AM, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> With the commit rate to the SDK picking up, it won't do to ignore the
> failing tests. Several commits seem to have broken something, and it's
> getting harder to tel
This build had been stuck on the VM for 2+ days. There was a very
non-descript dialog up complaining about an RTE in CS5. I've dismissed it
and stopped the build. The other builds in the queue seem to pick up fine,
so I'll let them run.
EdB
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 9:23 AM, wrote:
> See
Adding to an API shouldn't be a problem, as long as the new
methods/properties don't change anything about the existing
implementation...
EdB
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Harbs wrote:
> I’m working on cell selection of TLF tables.
>
> Cell selections does not fit into the normal index b
"We" are 99.9% sure, as there is nothing changed on the VM since May 15th,
the last day all the SDK tests passed.
EdB
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 2:07 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Are we 100% sure the build machine is set up correctly?
>
> I'm not seeingany failures on first run in:
> compo
As I understand it, asm.js is a subset of JavaScript, use in such a way
that, with added browser support, it allows for near native performance.
For FlexJS we currently use a superset of JavaScript, the Google Closure
Tools, because these allow us to approximate Actionscript very closely in a
brow
Please ignore. Apparently I have difficulties with letters and words today
;-)
EdB
On Thursday, May 29, 2014, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> As I understand it, asm.js is a subset of JavaScript, use in such a way
> that, with added browser support, it allows for near native performance.
&
As long as the procedure is properly (step by step actions) documented, I
don't think the requirement for Cygwin is all that bad, especially given
the UX improvement it will give to end users.
EdB
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 8:18 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala
wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 10:13 PM, A
>
> > May I ask why you said "Technologically no"?
> >
>
> Because Swift sucks
> <
> http://www.zdnet.com/apples-new-swift-development-language-highlights-the-companys-worst-side-730150/
> >
This is not a forum to aid in the spreading of FUD. All this guy has to say
about Swift is that it suc
We're going on 3 weeks with a failing Mustella now, and lots of commits
still being made to the repo...
Are you ready to revert whatever is causing these failures? You know who
you are...
EdB
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 8:38 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 6/2/14 11:25 AM, "Michael A. Labriola"
Theoretically, we can, as long as our AS4 doesn't require any player
changes.
Falcon compiles to bytecode (SWF). FalconJS (deprecated) and FalconJX
convert to JS, but require Falcon which creates the AST from code.
EdB
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 6:36 PM, jude wrote:
> Can't we make our own AS4
Chris,
Excellent news! This will make the SDK so much more accessible and should
really help retaining existing and attracting new users.
Thanks,
EdB
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 9:31 AM, Christofer Dutz
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> so I had to to quite a lot of cleaning up in Flexmojos and some tweakin
-1 (binding)
I'm vetoing this commit because it is causing the following (sets of)
Mustella tests to fail:
- LangPacks/Japanese/tests/runtimeErrorTests (aharui: "The new logic around
setting the hasFieldName and hadPreviousFieldName changed and is no longer
trigging the expected error which lets
-1 (binding)
I'm vetoing this commit because it is causing the following (sets of)
Mustella tests to fail:
- gumbo/components/ComboBox/Properties/ComboBox_Properties_UserInput
(aharui: "The ComboBox failures are due to the change FLEX-34222. I have
not looked into why.")
It has been three weeks
-1 (binding)
I'm vetoing this commit because it is causing the following (sets of)
Mustella tests to fail:
- components/MenuBar/Halo/Styles/MenuBar_MenuStyles
- components/Menu/Halo/Properties/Menu_Properties
- components/Menu/Halo/Styles/Menu_Styles
- components/Menu/Spark/Properties/Menu_Proper
>
> features. The limitation on loading compiled byte code is purely just a
> licensing and not a technical limitation that imposed by Apple.
>
As I understand it, it is mostly a security feature. They don't want any
VMs that can potentially run 'arbitrary' (unsigned) code inside one big
sandbox.
Just to be sure (and get the legal stuff completely out of the way):
http://www.apache.org/licenses/icla.txt
Thanks for your contributions up till now and in the future!
EdB
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 10:33 AM, jude wrote:
> Harbs owns the code I commit on this project but if it will speed thi
Nope, the unstable runs cause the entire Jenkins/Java/Apache stack to
crumble every few days. I was away from computer for a few days, but there
were no runs successful and I just logged in to the VM only to see a huge
Java RTE dialog up. Rebooting as we speak, let's see what happens then.
EdB
Bump...
EdB
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 9:56 AM, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> -1 (binding)
>
> I'm vetoing this commit because it is causing the following (sets of)
> Mustella tests to fail:
>
> - gumbo/components/ComboBox/Properties/ComboBox_Properties_UserInput
> (aharui:
Bump...
EdB
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 9:53 AM, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> -1 (binding)
>
> I'm vetoing this commit because it is causing the following (sets of)
> Mustella tests to fail:
>
> - LangPacks/Japanese/tests/runtimeErrorTests (aharui: "The new logic
> arou
is taking time.
>
>
>
> Mike
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Erik de Bruin [mailto:e...@ixsoftware.nl]
> *Sent:* Monday, June 09, 2014 9:42 AM
> *To:* dev@flex.apache.org; Michael A. Labriola; Alex Harui
>
> *Subject:* Re: [1/2] git commit: [flex-sdk] [refs/heads/develo
Justin,
Can you please look at this?
Thanks,
EdB
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 3:41 PM, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> Bump...
>
> EdB
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 9:56 AM, Erik de Bruin wrote:
>
>> -1 (binding)
>>
>> I'm vetoing this commit because
This commit has been vetoed. Please revert asap. We need Mustella to pass.
EdB
On Thursday, June 12, 2014, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Can you please look at this?
> Had a quick look nothing obvious, currently on holiday with limited
> internet access but may have some time next week.
>
Justin,
This is the other commit that has been vetoed. Please revert asap. We need
clean builds and Mustella to pass.
EdB
On Tuesday, June 10, 2014, Alex Harui wrote:
> -1 for reasons stated below.
>
> Justin, you never responded so I'm thinking my attempts to ask you about
> this have been
e will have to do it, or when he gets to a
> reliable connection.
>
> -Mark
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Erik de Bruin [mailto:e...@ixsoftware.nl ]
> Sent: Friday, June 13, 2014 10:45 AM
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: Re: git commit: [flex-sdk] [refs/head
And another week has gone by...
Can you please revert, then discuss the proper solution?
Thanks,
EdB
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 4:39 PM, Michael A. Labriola <
labri...@digitalprimates.net> wrote:
> >However much I'd like to "kill" a commit (or commit a kill?), my very
> limited Git knowledge
Mike gave us permission to revert. I hope to get to it this week after
> I get the FalconJX and FlexJS RCs out.
>
> From: Erik de Bruin
> Date: Monday, June 16, 2014 1:22 AM
> To: "Michael A. Labriola"
> Cc: "dev@flex.apache.org" , aharui
>
> Subj
The last one just failed (expectedly), now the -mobile and -air will run
(takes about 3 hrs.) after which the next -main will run.
EdB
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 7:51 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala
wrote:
> Erik,
>
> I think all the offending commits have been reverted (three so far) Can
> you pleas
you merged no longer
> exists. To say it only takes 5 minutes is not genuine...
>
> -Nick
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 1:14 PM, Erik de Bruin wrote:
>
> > Yeah, as Om indicated on the other 'revert' thread, the committer should
> > revert the vetoed commi
Yes!
Thanks, all.
EdB
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 8:12 AM, wrote:
> flex-sdk_mustella - Build # 954 - Fixed:
>
> http://flex-mustella.cloudapp.net/job/flex-sdk_mustella/954/
>
> Changes for Build #943
>
> Changes for Build #944
>
> Changes for Build #945
>
> Changes for Build #946
> [nick] Reve
>
> this is against Apache policy - releases must be manually checked
That seems oddly backwards for an organisation that exists to create,
support and evangelise bit collections that automate things...
And what is considered "manually"? Do I have to manually type commands into
the terminal in o
>
> 100% agree and that a useful and good thing, but that does not make them
> legal releases, and IMO it exposes the PMC (and thus the board) to greater
> risk.
>
Yeah, this has to stop. We cannot avoid doing 'useful and good things'
simply because some bored lawyer hypothesised there might be an
Did you actually look at the script and run it?
It's like a wizard that steps you through the process rather than an
automation of the process itself. It doesn't try take any responsibility
away from the voter, quite the opposite actually: it makes sure the voter
doesn't skip any part of the proce
Weird. We must be running different scripts.
The one I'm looking at just steps me through the process, asking for my
input when needed to make sure I have done my due diligence. It doesn't
just automatically run through the steps before exiting with: "all seems
well, please vote +1".
Nor does it
>
> As I have clearly stated I have no issue is the script, it is a useful
> tool. The danger is that it is used for the sole reason for voting +1 on
> releases and that IMO doesn't provide enough PMC oversight. While there a
> minimal set of things requited to vote +1 on a release there are a lot
If the items on that list are what we're REQUIRED to check before voting,
than I agree that the script is a bad thing, but it also means all my votes
up to this point have been invalid.
If they are NOT required, I maintain my position that the script is a very
nice utility that allows me to effici
Hi,
Externs need to be declared to the GCC with a special argument. I don't
think the option you're using passes the file to that argument. I think
FalconJX needs a new option. I'll look at it tomorrow.
Can you maybe file a JIRA so we have a reference?
EdB
On Wednesday, June 18, 2014, Peter E
In light of recent discussions, the answer must be a resounding: "Yes!"
EdB
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 8:14 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala
wrote:
> I was looking for the Tour de Flex Mobile app on Google Play (looks like it
> is gone already, btw). In any case, I stumbled upon this app [1] Looks
> li
Me too :-P
EdB
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 8:53 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala
wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 11:42 PM, Erik de Bruin
> wrote:
>
> > In light of recent discussions, the answer must be a resounding: "Yes!"
> >
> >
> Haha, I was hoping y
If a bricks and mortar - or rather: mud brick - store would use a blue
version of the Adobe logo and call itself "the adobe photo shoppe", would
that be an infraction on the logo and trademark of Adobe Photoshop? I'm
sure Adobe's lawyers would think so.
I would suggest asking the publisher to chan
I was wrong: 'external-js-lib' contents are mapped to the '--externs'
compiler option. So no need to change FalconJX, it looks like.
Peter, do you have a small project that I can use to debug this issue?
EdB
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 8:41 PM, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> Hi,
Also, the 'official' externs voor Google Maps API v3 is here:
https://github.com/google/closure-compiler/blob/master/contrib/externs/maps/google_maps_api_v3_11.js
EdB
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 1:39 PM, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> I was wrong: 'external-js-lib' con
You said "not enforce a change." I don't agree with that. I do agree with
your suggested approach method (email first, if no action, then consider
options).
EdB
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 3:15 PM, Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > If a bricks and mortar - or rather: mud brick - store would use a
701 - 800 of 2506 matches
Mail list logo