+1 (non-binding)
Thanks,
Roc
在 2023-06-19 10:55:05，"Zhu Zhu" 写道：
>+1 (binding)
>
>Thanks,
>Zhu
>
>Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai 于2023年6月17日周六 11:32写道：
>>
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 16, 2023, 09:53 Jing Ge wrote:
>>
>> > +1(binding)
>> >
>> > Best Regards,
>> > Jing
>> >
>> > On Fri, Jun 16,
+1 (binding)
Thanks,
Zhu
Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai 于2023年6月17日周六 11:32写道：
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Fri, Jun 16, 2023, 09:53 Jing Ge wrote:
>
> > +1(binding)
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > Jing
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 10:10 AM Lijie Wang
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (binding)
> > >
> > > Thanks for
Hi Becket,
Thanks for the reply! I’d like to continue the conversation about compatibility
outside of this FLIP thread, but for now, I can accept your decision. It’s
certainly an improvement.
Thanks again,
John
On Sun, Jun 18, 2023, at 21:42, Becket Qin wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> Completely agree
Hi John,
Completely agree with all you said.
Can we consider only dropping deprecated APIs in major releases across the
> board? I understand that Experimental and PublicEvolving APIs are by
> definition less stable, but it seems like this should be reflected in the
> required deprecation period
Jane Chan created FLINK-32374:
-
Summary: ExecNodeGraphInternalPlan#writeToFile should support
TRUNCATE_EXISTING for overwriting
Key: FLINK-32374
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-32374
I think there is some confusion:
Chesnay, not me, recently checked in changes into master so that Flink will
build + test + run with experimental support for Java 17 but with Kryo 2.x
as-is so this will error with Java records. Chesnay created this particular
email thread related to this work.
Hi all,
Sorry for the late reply, I have a discussion with Lincoln offline,
mainly about
the naming of the hints option. Thanks Lincoln for the valuable suggestions.
Let me answer the last email inline.
>For `JavaAsyncTableFunc0` in flip, can you use a scenario like RPC call as
an example?
Hi Kurt,
Thanks for your contribution. I am a little bit confused about the email
title, since your PR[1] is not merged into the master yet. I guess, with
"Experimental Java 17 support", you meant it is available on your branch
which is based on the master.
If I am not mistaken, there is no vote
