chive does not contain binary
4. Source archive is signed with *125FD8DB *instead of B78A5EA1
5. Checked that all poms point to version 5.1.0-1.20
6. Checked that pom key is signed with *B78A5EA1*
Best regards
Keith Lee
On Fri, Jun 27, 2025 at 4:44 PM Keith Lee
wrote:
> +1, thank you Daren,
ary
4. Source archive is signed with *125FD8DB* instead of B78A5EA1
5. Checked that all poms point to version 6.0.0
6. Checked that pom key is signed with B78A5EA1
7. Checked licenses.
Best regards
Keith Lee
On Fri, Jun 27, 2025 at 4:44 PM Keith Lee
wrote:
> +1, thank you Daren, Hong a
+1, thank you Daren, Hong and Danny!
Best regards
Keith Lee
On Fri, Jun 27, 2025 at 2:23 PM Daren Wong wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> Please review and vote on release candidate #1 for flink-connector-aws
> v6.0.0, as follows:
> [ ] +1, Approve the release
> [ ] -1, Do not appr
+1, thank you Daren, Hong and Danny!
Best regards
Keith Lee
On Fri, Jun 27, 2025 at 2:22 PM Daren Wong wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> Please review and vote on release candidate #1 for flink-connector-aws
> v5.1.0, as follows:
> [ ] +1, Approve the release
> [ ] -1, Do not appr
Keith Lee created FLINK-37949:
-
Summary: FlinkKinesisConsumer on EFO mode runs into Netty deadlock
on client close during stop-with-savepoint
Key: FLINK-37949
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-37949
Keith Lee created FLINK-37808:
-
Summary: Checkpoint completed after job failure
Key: FLINK-37808
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-37808
Project: Flink
Issue Type: Bug
Keith Lee created FLINK-37687:
-
Summary: Bump flink-connector-aws to 2.0
Key: FLINK-37687
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-37687
Project: Flink
Issue Type: Bug
tched based on maxBatchSize which
is then submitted as a PutMetricDataRequest.
5. On the batching of requests, how do you propose batch size (specifically
size) is enforced? Specifically, I am interested in how we are calculating
the data sizes of a batch.
Best regards
Keith Lee
On Fri, Apr 11, 2
Keith Lee created FLINK-37627:
-
Summary: Restarting from a checkpoint/savepoint which coincides
with shard split causes data loss
Key: FLINK-37627
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-37627
Keith Lee created FLINK-36939:
-
Summary: High CPU Utilization with Flink Kinesis EFO Consumer
Key: FLINK-36939
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-36939
Project: Flink
Issue Type
Keith Lee created FLINK-36155:
-
Summary: ByteBuf.release() was not called before it's
garbage-collected
Key: FLINK-36155
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-36155
Project:
Keith Lee created FLINK-35853:
-
Summary: Regression in checkpoint size when performing full
checkpointing in RocksDB
Key: FLINK-35853
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-35853
Project: Flink
+1 (non binding)
Best regards
Keith Lee
On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 9:48 AM Zakelly Lan wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
>
> Best,
> Zakelly
>
> On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 3:54 PM Yuepeng Pan wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> >
>
very useful for users who may want to implement said limiting.
Best regards
Keith Lee
On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 5:50 PM Piotr Nowojski wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> >> Do you know if there is a way to limit the CPU utilisation of s5cmd? I
> see
> >> worker and concurrency configura
I meant to address Piotr on the above, apologies!
Best regards
Keith Lee
On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 8:06 AM Keith Lee
wrote:
> Hi Lorenzo,
>
> > As I mentioned above, in the end I think hardcoding in Flink support for
> the `cpulimit` doesn't seem appropriate and at the
that. Can you provide
other example configuration (actual examples for MySQL/Postgres etc. would
be great) that may illustrate the usefulness of the proposal better?
Best regards
Keith Lee
On Tue, May 21, 2024 at 2:01 PM Leonard Xu wrote:
> Thanks Lorenzo for kicking off this discussion.
>
, should FLIP criteria [1] be updated so that reorganisation
of public documentation fall under it as well?
Best regards
Keith Lee
[1]
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/plugins/servlet/mobile?contentId=65145551#FlinkImprovementProposals-Whatisconsidereda%22majorchange%22thatneedsaFLIP?
On Thu
me.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-35369
Appreciate your thoughts and suggestions.
Best regards
Keith Lee
Keith Lee created FLINK-35369:
-
Summary: Improve `Table API and SQL` page or add new page to guide
new users to right Flink SQL option
Key: FLINK-35369
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-35369
restore after
Flink statement changes.
How best should such a feature request be driven? Will a FLIP be necessary?
Best regards
Keith Lee
On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 1:27 PM Martijn Visser (Jira)
wrote:
>
> [
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3
the effort to fix the bug.
Best regards
Keith Lee
On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 11:37 AM Keith Lee (Jira) wrote:
> Keith Lee created FLINK-35336:
> -
>
> Summary: SQL failed to restore from savepoint after change in
> default-parallelismF
Keith Lee created FLINK-35336:
-
Summary: SQL failed to restore from savepoint after change in
default-parallelismFlink/Flink:User
Key: FLINK-35336
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-35336
+1 (non-binding)
Best regards
Keith Lee
On Sat, 11 May 2024 at 04:58, Shengkai Fang wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Best,
> Shengkai
>
> Ron Liu 于2024年5月10日周五 12:07写道：
>
> > +1(binding)
> >
> > Best,
> > Ron
> >
> > Jark Wu 于2024
Hi Piotr,
Thank you for the proposal. Looks great.
Along similar line of Aleks' question on memory usage.
The proposal mentions that s5cmd utilises 100% of CPU similar to Flink
1.18. However, this will be a native process outside of the JVM. Are there
risk of large/long state download starving t
+1 (non-binding)
Great work on the benchmark data.
Keith
On Thu, May 9, 2024 at 4:53 AM 周仁祥 wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> ConradJam 于2024年5月7日周二 11:35写道：
>
> > +1 (no-binding)
> >
> > Piotr Nowojski 于2024年5月6日周一 20:17写道：
> >
> > > +1 (binding)
> > >
> > > Piotrek
> > >
> > > pon., 6 maj 2024
25 matches
Mail list logo
