Hi community,
In the past releases, we have been working on refactoring Flink's scheduler
with the goal of making the scheduler extensible [1]. We have rolled out
most of the intended refactoring in Flink 1.10, and we think it is now time
to leverage our newly introduced abstractions to implement
Thanks for driving this discussion, Zhu Zhu & Gary.
I found that the image link in this FLIP is not working well. When I
open that link, Google doc told me that I have no access privilege.
Could you take a look at that issue?
Best,
Yangze Guo
On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 1:38 AM Gary Yao wrote:
>
>
Thanks for reporting this Yangze.
I have update the permission to those images. Everyone are able to view
them now.
Thanks,
Zhu Zhu
Yangze Guo 于2020年3月27日周五 上午11:25写道:
> Thanks for driving this discussion, Zhu Zhu & Gary.
>
> I found that the image link in this FLIP is not working well. When I
Thanks for updating!
+1 for supporting the pipelined region scheduling. Although we could
not prevent resource deadlock in all scenarios, it is really a big
step.
The design generally LGTM.
One minor thing I want to make sure. If I understand correctly, the
blocking edge will not be consumable b
To Yangze,
>> the blocking edge will not be consumable before the upstream is finished.
Yes. This is how we define a BLOCKING result partition, "Blocking
partitions represent blocking data exchanges, where the data stream is
first fully produced and then consumed".
>> I'm also wondering could we
Gary & Zhu Zhu,
Thanks for preparing this FLIP, and a BIG +1 from my side. The trade-off
between resource utilization and potential deadlock problems has always
been a pain. Despite not solving all the deadlock cases, this FLIP is
definitely a big improvement. IIUC, it has already covered all the
Thanks for creating this FLIP Zhu Zhu and Gary!
+1 for adding pipelined region scheduling.
Concerning the extended SlotProvider interface I have an idea how we could
further improve it. If I am not mistaken, then you have proposed to
introduce the two timeouts in order to distinguish between batc
Thanks for the comments!
To Xintong,
It's a bit strange since the in page links work as expected. Would you take
another try?
To Till,
- Regarding the idea to improve to SlotProvider interface
I think it is a good idea and thanks a lot! In the current design we make
slot requests for batch jobs t
Hi, Zhu Zhu,
Thanks for the explanation and information. I also agree that it out
of the scope of this FLIP and glad to see that we are moving forward
to a more extensible scheduler!
Best,
Yangze Guo
On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 1:31 AM Zhu Zhu wrote:
>
> Thanks for the comments!
>
> To Xintong,
> I
@ZhuZhu
The links work for me now. Someone might have fixed them. Never mind.
Thank you~
Xintong Song
On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 1:31 AM Zhu Zhu wrote:
> Thanks for the comments!
>
> To Xintong,
> It's a bit strange since the in page links work as expected. Would you take
> another try?
>
> To
>
> The links work for me now. Someone might have fixed them. Never mind.
>
Actually, I fixed the links after seeing your email. Thanks for reporting.
Best,
Gary
On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 3:48 AM Xintong Song wrote:
> @ZhuZhu
>
> The links work for me now. Someone might have fixed them. Never mi
Thanks for the nice suggestion Till.
The section 'Bulk Slot Allocation' is updated.
Thanks,
Zhu Zhu
Gary Yao 于2020年3月30日周一 下午3:38写道:
> >
> > The links work for me now. Someone might have fixed them. Never mind.
> >
>
> Actually, I fixed the links after seeing your email. Thanks for reporting.
>
12 matches
Mail list logo