Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-256 Support Job Dynamic Parameter With Flink Rest Api

Everyone, we have 2 bounding votes and 2 unbounding votes in our voting (url: https://lists.apache.org/thread/89f7kwnqgs8mfwos0h6b27lt3xn7383t). According to the rules, we need at least 3 bound votes to start this FLIP. If you forget to vote, it doesn't matter, we still have time to vote it, let's

Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-256 Support Job Dynamic Parameter With Flink Rest Api

+1 On Sun, Sep 11, 2022 at 8:04 PM Zheng Yu Chen wrote: > Now FLIP-256 is start vote in this thread url: > >

Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-256 Support Job Dynamic Parameter With Flink Rest Api

Now FLIP-256 is start vote in this thread url: https://lists.apache.org/thread/89f7kwnqgs8mfwos0h6b27lt3xn7383t zhengyu chen 于2022年8月15日周一 18:06写道： > > Hi all, > > > We would like to start a discussion thread on FLIP-256 Support Job > Dynamic Parameter With Flink Rest Api >

Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-256 Support Job Dynamic Parameter With Flink Rest Api

That sounds good to me. Thanks for working in this Zheng Yu! Hong From: Zheng Yu Chen Sent: 01 September 2022 05:08:03 To: dev@flink.apache.org Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL][DISCUSS] FLIP-256 Support Job Dynamic Parameter With Flink Rest Api CAUTION

Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-256 Support Job Dynamic Parameter With Flink Rest Api

, Aug 16, 2022 at 7:21 AM Zheng Yu Chen < > jam.gz...@gmail.com> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > This is a good suggestion, we can start this work > after we finish the > > > >

Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-256 Support Job Dynamic Parameter With Flink Rest Api

 Ok, I think that’s fair - overriding user config expands the scope of the FLIP, should cover CLI and REST, and can be split into another discussion. Since the motivation is to make the REST API have parity with the CLI, happy to defer further work to a different thread. @Chesnay, to

Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-256 Support Job Dynamic Parameter With Flink Rest Api

ed equivalent of > >> this, which is on > >> > > > our > >> > > > list to try to upstream. Your proposal would *almost* > >> work "off the > >> > > > shelf" > >> > > > for us. We have an inverted order or prior

Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-256 Support Job Dynamic Parameter With Flink Rest Api

ish the > > > > discussion and vote > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Best > > > > > > > > ConradJam > > > > > > > > > &g

RE: [DISCUSS] FLIP-256 Support Job Dynamic Parameter With Flink Rest Api

> +1, this will make external systems connected to Flink more efficient. > Thanks for driving the feature. Best, Manson On 2022/08/15 10:06:18 zhengyu chen wrote: > Hi all, > > > We would like to start a discussion thread on FLIP-256 Support Job Dynamic > Parameter With Flink

Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-256 Support Job Dynamic Parameter With Flink Rest Api

ert > > > > the > > > > order? This could be decoupled to a follow-up FLIP. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Danny Cranmer > > > > > > > > > > > &

Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-256 Support Job Dynamic Parameter With Flink Rest Api

values we set, since some are > > managed from > > > > > our > > > > > service configuration, example: checkpointing interval. > > > > > > > > > > How would

Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-256 Support Job Dynamic Parameter With Flink Rest Api

; > order? This could be decoupled to a follow-up FLIP. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Danny Cranmer > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 7:21 AM Zheng Yu Chen < > jam.gz...@gmail.com> > &

Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-256 Support Job Dynamic Parameter With Flink Rest Api

> > > > discussion and vote > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Best > > > > > > > > ConradJam > > > > > > > > >

Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-256 Support Job Dynamic Parameter With Flink Rest Api

> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > This is a good suggestion, we can start this work after we > finish the > > > > discussion and vote > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Best > > > &g

RE: [DISCUSS] FLIP-256 Support Job Dynamic Parameter With Flink Rest Api

+1, Lgtm, this proposal may helps me to manage the job more conveniently On 2022/08/15 10:06:18 zhengyu chen wrote: > Hi all, > > > We would like to start a discussion thread on FLIP-256 Support Job Dynamic > Parameter With Flink Rest Api >

Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-256 Support Job Dynamic Parameter With Flink Rest Api

1 AM Zheng Yu Chen > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > This is a good suggestion, we can start this work after we > finish the > > > > discussion and vote > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Best > > >

Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-256 Support Job Dynamic Parameter With Flink Rest Api

t; > > > > 于2022年8月15日周一 21:01写道： > > > > > > > I've created a new ticket [FLINK-28973] Extending > > /jars/:jarid/plan API > > > to > > > > support setting Flink configs - ASF JIRA (apache.org)<

Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-256 Support Job Dynamic Parameter With Flink Rest Api

igs - ASF JIRA (apache.org)< > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-28973>. for the job > > plan > > > API. > > > > Maybe we can create a new umbrella ticket for FLIP-256 and put > > > FLI

Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-256 Support Job Dynamic Parameter With Flink Rest Api

t > > > the > > > order? This could be decoupled to a follow-up FLIP. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Danny Cranmer > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 7:21 AM Zheng Yu Chen < > > jam.gz...@gma

Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-256 Support Job Dynamic Parameter With Flink Rest Api

ail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > This is a good suggestion, we can start this work after we > finish the > > > discussion and vote > > > > > > -- > > > Best > > > > > > ConradJam > >

Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-256 Support Job Dynamic Parameter With Flink Rest Api

gt; plan > > API. > > > Maybe we can create a new umbrella ticket for FLIP-256 and put > > FLINK-27060 > > > & FLINK-28973 as subtasks. WDYT? > > > > > > Best, > > > Zhanghao Chen

Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-256 Support Job Dynamic Parameter With Flink Rest Api

)< > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-28973>. for the job > plan > > API. > > > Maybe we can create a new umbrella ticket for FLIP-256 and put > > FLINK-27060 > > > & FLINK-28973 as subtasks. WDYT? > > > > > > Best, >

Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-256 Support Job Dynamic Parameter With Flink Rest Api

> API. > > Maybe we can create a new umbrella ticket for FLIP-256 and put > FLINK-27060 > > & FLINK-28973 as subtasks. WDYT? > > > > Best, > > Zhanghao Chen > > ____________ > > From: zhengyu c

Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-256 Support Job Dynamic Parameter With Flink Rest Api

e job plan > API. > > Maybe we can create a new umbrella ticket for FLIP-256 and put > FLINK-27060 > > & FLINK-28973 as subtasks. WDYT? > > > > Best, > > Zhanghao Chen > > ________ > > From: zhengyu chen > > Sent: Mon

Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-256 Support Job Dynamic Parameter With Flink Rest Api

nt: Monday, August 15, 2022 18:06 > To: dev@flink.apache.org > Subject: [DISCUSS] FLIP-256 Support Job Dynamic Parameter With Flink Rest > Api > > Hi all, > > > We would like to start a discussion thread on FLIP-256 Support Job Dynamic > Parameter With Flink Rest Api > &

Re:[DISCUSS] FLIP-256 Support Job Dynamic Parameter With Flink Rest Api

+1 Thanks for driving this,It makes the REST API that runs the job more powerful and complete Best JasonLee Replied Message | From | zhengyu chen | | Date | 08/15/2022 18:06 | | To | | | Subject | [DISCUSS] FLIP-256 Support Job Dynamic Parameter With Flink Rest Api | Hi all, We

Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-256 Support Job Dynamic Parameter With Flink Rest Api

LINK-28973 as subtasks. WDYT? Best, Zhanghao Chen From: zhengyu chen Sent: Monday, August 15, 2022 18:06 To: dev@flink.apache.org Subject: [DISCUSS] FLIP-256 Support Job Dynamic Parameter With Flink Rest Api Hi all, We would like to start a discussion thread o

Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-256 Support Job Dynamic Parameter With Flink Rest Api

From: zhengyu chen Sent: Monday, August 15, 2022 18:06 To: dev@flink.apache.org Subject: [DISCUSS] FLIP-256 Support Job Dynamic Parameter With Flink Rest Api Hi all, We would like to start a discussion thread on FLIP-256 Support Job Dynamic Parameter With Flink Rest Api <ht

Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-256 Support Job Dynamic Parameter With Flink Rest Api

+1, I think this is a very useful proposal, especially for session mode. And for simplicity, maybe we can treat the job-level configurations and cluster-level configurations identically, as your mentioned, the cluster-level configurations will be ignored. Best, Yanfei zhengyu chen 于2022年8月15日周一

[DISCUSS] FLIP-256 Support Job Dynamic Parameter With Flink Rest Api

Hi all, We would like to start a discussion thread on FLIP-256 Support Job Dynamic Parameter With Flink Rest Api [1] After the user submits the jar package, running a job through