[DISCUSS] FLIP-441: Show the JobType and remove Execution Mode on Flink WebUI

2024-03-26 Thread Rui Fan
Hi flink developers, I'd like to start a discussion to discuss FLIP-441: Show the JobType and remove Execution Mode on Flink WebUI[1]. Currently, the jobType has 2 types in Flink: STREAMING and BATCH. They work on completely different principles, such as: scheduler, shuffle, join, etc.

Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-441: Show the JobType and remove Execution Mode on Flink WebUI

2024-03-27 Thread Muhammet Orazov
/flink/flink-docs-release-1.18/docs/dev/datastream/execution_mode/ On 2024-03-27 06:23, Rui Fan wrote: Hi flink developers, I'd like to start a discussion to discuss FLIP-441: Show the JobType and remove Execution Mode on Flink WebUI[1]. Currently, the jobType has 2 types in Flink: STRE

Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-441: Show the JobType and remove Execution Mode on Flink WebUI

2024-03-27 Thread Venkatakrishnan Sowrirajan
link/flink-docs-release-1.18/docs/dev/datastream/execution_mode/__;!!IKRxdwAv5BmarQ!eFyqVJyje_8hu1vMSUwKGBsj8vqsFDisEvJ5AxPV0LduhhHWF3rPKYEEE-09biA0unFbfMy5AVQZMgBv1AOa5oTHmcYlkUE$ > > > On 2024-03-27 06:23, Rui Fan wrote: > > Hi flink developers, > > > > I'd like to start a d

Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-441: Show the JobType and remove Execution Mode on Flink WebUI

2024-03-27 Thread Venkatakrishnan Sowrirajan
rldefense.com/v3/__https://nightlies.apache.org/flink/flink-docs-release-1.18/docs/dev/datastream/execution_mode/__;!!IKRxdwAv5BmarQ!eFyqVJyje_8hu1vMSUwKGBsj8vqsFDisEvJ5AxPV0LduhhHWF3rPKYEEE-09biA0unFbfMy5AVQZMgBv1AOa5oTHmcYlkUE$ >> >> >> On 2024-03-27 06:23, Rui Fan wrote: &g

Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-441: Show the JobType and remove Execution Mode on Flink WebUI

2024-03-28 Thread Rui Fan
://urldefense.com/v3/__https://nightlies.apache.org/flink/flink-docs-release-1.18/docs/dev/datastream/execution_mode/__;!!IKRxdwAv5BmarQ!eFyqVJyje_8hu1vMSUwKGBsj8vqsFDisEvJ5AxPV0LduhhHWF3rPKYEEE-09biA0unFbfMy5AVQZMgBv1AOa5oTHmcYlkUE$ >>> >>> >>> On 2024-03-27 06:23, Ru

Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-441: Show the JobType and remove Execution Mode on Flink WebUI

2024-03-28 Thread Rui Fan
tream API [1], >>>> would that also affect/hide the DataStream execution mode >>>> if we remove it from the WebUI? >>>> >>>> Best, >>>> Muhammet >>>> >>>> [1]: >>>> >>>> https://urldefense

Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-441: Show the JobType and remove Execution Mode on Flink WebUI

2024-03-28 Thread Muhammet Orazov
!!IKRxdwAv5BmarQ!eFyqVJyje_8hu1vMSUwKGBsj8vqsFDisEvJ5AxPV0LduhhHWF3rPKYEEE-09biA0unFbfMy5AVQZMgBv1AOa5oTHmcYlkUE$ On 2024-03-27 06:23, Rui Fan wrote: > Hi flink developers, > > I'd like to start a discussion to discuss FLIP-441: > Show the JobType and remove Execution Mode on Flink WebUI[1]. > > Currently, the jobT

Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-441: Show the JobType and remove Execution Mode on Flink WebUI

2024-04-06 Thread Rui Fan
gt; >>> > >>>> Hello Rui, > >>>> > >>>> Thanks for the proposal! It looks good! > >>>> > >>>> I have minor clarification from my side: > >>>> > >>>> The execution mode is also used for the DataStream

Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-441: Show the JobType and remove Execution Mode on Flink WebUI

2024-04-08 Thread Ahmed Hamdy
4 at 4:49 AM Muhammet Orazov > > >>> wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> Hello Rui, > > >>>> > > >>>> Thanks for the proposal! It looks good! > > >>>> > > >>>> I have minor clarification from m

Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-441: Show the JobType and remove Execution Mode on Flink WebUI

2024-04-08 Thread Rui Fan
;> vsowr...@asu.edu> wrote: > > > >> > > > >>> This will be a very useful addition to Flink UI. Thanks Rui for > > > >>> starting > > > >>> a FLIP for this improvement. > > > >>> > > > >>> Regards > > > >

Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-441: Show the JobType and remove Execution Mode on Flink WebUI

2024-04-08 Thread Ahmed Hamdy
2024 at 10:15 AM Venkatakrishnan Sowrirajan < > > > > >> vsowr...@asu.edu> wrote: > > > > >> > > > > >>> This will be a very useful addition to Flink UI. Thanks Rui for > > > > >>> starting > > > > >&

Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-441: Show the JobType and remove Execution Mode on Flink WebUI

2024-04-09 Thread Zakelly Lan
> > > > > >> > > > > > >> I assume the current proposal would also handle the case of > mixed > > > mode > > > > > >> (BATCH + STREAMING within the same app) in the future, right? > > > > > >> > > &g