I've created the release candidate and started the vote thread.
This is the document to coordinate testing:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1oCOHwHwZNjHb7MX-qLvA61akEBOAxSIYo53MoygUqxQ/
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 7:31 PM, Ufuk Celebi wrote:
>
> > On 02 Feb 2016, at 17:30, Robert Metzger wrote:
> On 02 Feb 2016, at 17:30, Robert Metzger wrote:
>
> Thank you for taking care of this. +1
>
> I'd like to include this in to the 0.10.2 release:
> https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1576
OK (merged to master and release-10)
Thank you for taking care of this. +1
I'd like to include this in to the 0.10.2 release:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1576
On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 1:57 PM, Ufuk Celebi wrote:
>
> > On 02 Feb 2016, at 11:43, Stephan Ewen wrote:
> >
> > +1
> >
> > @Ufuk: Would you be the release manager f
> On 02 Feb 2016, at 11:43, Stephan Ewen wrote:
>
> +1
>
> @Ufuk: Would you be the release manager for that one?
Yes.
Thanks for the responses so far. I will go ahead and prepare a release
candidate soon.
If you have any minor fixes, which you would like to have in the release,
please repo
+1
@Ufuk: Would you be the release manager for that one?
On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 11:07 AM, Till Rohrmann wrote:
> +1, since user were asking for it.
>
> On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Fabian Hueske wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > 2016-02-02 10:44 GMT+01:00 Maximilian Michels :
> >
> > > Hi Ufuk,
> >
+1, since user were asking for it.
On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Fabian Hueske wrote:
> +1
>
> 2016-02-02 10:44 GMT+01:00 Maximilian Michels :
>
> > Hi Ufuk,
> >
> > +1 If the fixes are straightforward such that we don't need to test
> > extensively, I'm all for it! Releasing doesn't take muc
+1
2016-02-02 10:44 GMT+01:00 Maximilian Michels :
> Hi Ufuk,
>
> +1 If the fixes are straightforward such that we don't need to test
> extensively, I'm all for it! Releasing doesn't take much time then.
>
> On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 9:57 PM, Nick Dimiduk wrote:
> > +1 for a 0.10.2 maintenance rele
Hi Ufuk,
+1 If the fixes are straightforward such that we don't need to test
extensively, I'm all for it! Releasing doesn't take much time then.
On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 9:57 PM, Nick Dimiduk wrote:
> +1 for a 0.10.2 maintenance release.
>
> On Monday, February 1, 2016, Ufuk Celebi wrote:
>
>> He
+1 for a 0.10.2 maintenance release.
On Monday, February 1, 2016, Ufuk Celebi wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> Our release-0.10 branch contains some important fixes (for example a
> critical fix in the network stack). I would like to hear your opinions
> about doing a 0.10.2 bug fix release.
>
> I think it
Hey all,
Our release-0.10 branch contains some important fixes (for example a
critical fix in the network stack). I would like to hear your opinions
about doing a 0.10.2 bug fix release.
I think it's a good idea to go for it now. Even though we have the 1.0.0
release coming up, it's not clear whe
10 matches
Mail list logo
