[RESULT][VOTE] FLIP-106: Support Python UDF in SQL Function DDL

Hi all, The voting time for FLIP-106 has passed. I'm closing the vote now. There were 5 +1 votes, 3 of which are binding: - Jincheng (binding) - Hequn (binding) - Dian (binding) - Benchao (non-binding) - Dan (non-binding) There were no disapproving votes. Thus, FLIP-106 has been accepted.

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-106: Support Python UDF in SQL Function DDL

Thanks everyone for the votes! I’ll summarize the voting result in a separate email. Best, Wei > 在 2020年3月18日，15:37，zoudan 写道： > > +1 (non-binding) > > Best, > Dan Zou >

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-106: Support Python UDF in SQL Function DDL

+1 (non-binding) Best, Dan Zou

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-106: Support Python UDF in SQL Function DDL

gt;>> Hi Kurt, > >>> > >>> This vote thread is independent from my side[1]. If this thread is > >>> combined with another thread from your side, you can try to change the > >> mail > >>> client. > >>> > >>> Bes

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-106: Support Python UDF in SQL Function DDL

try to change the >> mail >>> client. >>> >>> Best, >>> Wei >>> >>> [1] >>> >> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/VOTE-FLIP-106-Support-Python-UDF-in-SQL-Function-DDL-td38895.html >>> <

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-106: Support Python UDF in SQL Function DDL

vote thread is independent from my side[1]. If this thread is > > combined with another thread from your side, you can try to change the > mail > > client. > > > > Best, > > Wei > > > > [1] > > > http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-106: Support Python UDF in SQL Function DDL

> > Best, > Wei > > [1] > http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/VOTE-FLIP-106-Support-Python-UDF-in-SQL-Function-DDL-td38895.html > < > http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/VOTE-FLIP-106-Support-Python-UDF-in-SQL-Function-DDL

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-106: Support Python UDF in SQL Function DDL

Hi Kurt, This vote thread is independent from my side[1]. If this thread is combined with another thread from your side, you can try to change the mail client. Best, Wei [1] http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/VOTE-FLIP-106-Support-Python-UDF-in-SQL-Function-DDL

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-106: Support Python UDF in SQL Function DDL

Hi, please use a dedicated vote thread. Best, Kurt On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 10:36 AM jincheng sun wrote: > +1 > > Best, > Jincheng > > > > Wei Zhong 于2020年3月13日周五 下午9:04写道： > > > Hi all, > > > > I would like to start the vote for FLIP-106[1] which is discussed and > > reached consensus in the

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-106: Support Python UDF in SQL Function DDL

+1 Best, Jincheng Wei Zhong 于2020年3月13日周五 下午9:04写道： > Hi all, > > I would like to start the vote for FLIP-106[1] which is discussed and > reached consensus in the discussion thread[2]. > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. I'll try to close it by > 2020-03-18 14:00 UTC, unless

[VOTE] FLIP-106: Support Python UDF in SQL Function DDL

Hi all, I would like to start the vote for FLIP-106[1] which is discussed and reached consensus in the discussion thread[2]. The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. I'll try to close it by 2020-03-18 14:00 UTC, unless there is an objection or not enough votes. Best, Wei [1]