Re: [VOTE] FLIP-143: Unified Sink API

2020-10-05 Thread Guowei Ma
I have to correct the vote result as following: There were 5 votes, 3 of which are binding: - Aljoscha Krettek (binding) - Steven Wu - Kostas Kloudas (binding) - Jingsong Li (binding) - Jiangang Liu Changes still have been accepted. Sorry to disturb everyone! Best, Guowei On Wed, Sep 30,

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-143: Unified Sink API

2020-09-29 Thread Guowei Ma
Hi all, The voting time for FLIP-143 [1] has passed. I'm closing the vote now. There were 5 votes, 4 of which are binding: - Aljoscha Krettek (binding) - Steven Wu - Kostas Kloudas (binding) - Jingsong Li (binding) - Jiangang Liu (binding) There were no -1 votes. Thus, changes have been

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-143: Unified Sink API

2020-09-29 Thread 刘建刚
+1 (binding) Best, Liu Jiangang Jingsong Li 于2020年9月29日周二 下午1:36写道: > +1 (binding) > > Best, > Jingsong > > On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 3:21 AM Kostas Kloudas wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > @Steven Wu I think there will be opportunities to fine tune the API > > during the implementation. > > >

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-143: Unified Sink API

2020-09-28 Thread Jingsong Li
+1 (binding) Best, Jingsong On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 3:21 AM Kostas Kloudas wrote: > +1 (binding) > > @Steven Wu I think there will be opportunities to fine tune the API > during the implementation. > > Cheers, > Kostas > > On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 7:56 PM Steven Wu wrote: > > > > +1

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-143: Unified Sink API

2020-09-27 Thread Kostas Kloudas
+1 (binding) @Steven Wu I think there will be opportunities to fine tune the API during the implementation. Cheers, Kostas On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 7:56 PM Steven Wu wrote: > > +1 (non-binding) > > Although I would love to continue the discussion for tweaking the > CommitResult/GlobaCommitter

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-143: Unified Sink API

2020-09-27 Thread Steven Wu
+1 (non-binding) Although I would love to continue the discussion for tweaking the CommitResult/GlobaCommitter interface maybe during the implementation phase. On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 5:35 AM Aljoscha Krettek wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Aljoscha > > On 25.09.20 14:26, Guowei Ma wrote: > > From

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-143: Unified Sink API

2020-09-25 Thread Aljoscha Krettek
+1 (binding) Aljoscha On 25.09.20 14:26, Guowei Ma wrote: From the discussion[1] we could find that FLIP focuses on providing an unified transactional sink API. So I updated the FLIP's title to "Unified Transactional Sink API". But I found that the old link could not be opened again. I would

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-143: Unified Sink API

2020-09-25 Thread Guowei Ma
>From the discussion[1] we could find that FLIP focuses on providing an unified transactional sink API. So I updated the FLIP's title to "Unified Transactional Sink API". But I found that the old link could not be opened again. I would update the link[2] here. Sorry for the inconvenience. [1]

[VOTE] FLIP-143: Unified Sink API

2020-09-24 Thread Guowei Ma
Hi, all After the discussion in [1], I would like to open a voting thread for FLIP-143 [2], which proposes a unified sink api. The vote will be open until September 29th (72h + weekend), unless there is an objection or not enough votes. [1]