Hi everyone,
I'm happy to announce that we have unanimously approved this release.
There are 6 approving votes, 3 of which are binding:
* Jark
* Jingsong
* Hequn
* Kurt (binding)
* Till (binding)
* Jincheng (binding)
There are no disapproving votes.
Thanks everyone!
Cheers,
Jark
gt; > > I think FLINK-14385<
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-14385>
> > > > is not introduced from release-1.9 but since when we decide to
> release
> > > > hadoop-free Flink form 1.8 [1]
> > > > >
> > > > >
>
e to release
> > > hadoop-free Flink form 1.8 [1]
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-11266
> > > >
> > > > Best
> > > > Yun Tang
> > > > _
/FLINK-11266
> >
> > Best
> > Yun Tang
> > ____
> > From: Hequn Cheng
> > Sent: Sunday, October 13, 2019 17:28
> > To: dev
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release 1.9.1, release candidate #1
> >
> > +1 (non-bind
/issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-11266
>
> Best
> Yun Tang
>
> From: Hequn Cheng
> Sent: Sunday, October 13, 2019 17:28
> To: dev
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release 1.9.1, release candidate #1
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Do
Cheng
Sent: Sunday, October 13, 2019 17:28
To: dev
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release 1.9.1, release candidate #1
+1 (non-binding)
Do the following checks and all are success.
- Verified signatures and hashes.
- Built from the source archive.
- Check repository contains all artifacts.
- Test Wor
+1 (non-binding)
Do the following checks and all are success.
- Verified signatures and hashes.
- Built from the source archive.
- Check repository contains all artifacts.
- Test WordCount on a local standalone cluster.
a. Both streaming and batch
b. Web UI works fine
- Test WordCount on
Hi Jingsong,
Thanks for verifying. I updated the fixVersion to 1.9.2 for these issues.
Best,
Jark
> 在 2019年10月12日，16:45，Jingsong Li 写道：
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> - Check if checksums files match the corresponding release files
> - Check if GPG files match the corresponding release files
> -
+1 (non-binding)
- Check if checksums files match the corresponding release files
- Check if GPG files match the corresponding release files
- Verify that the source archives do not contains any binaries
- Build the source with Maven to ensure all source files have Apache headers
- Check that all
+1 from my side.
- checked signatures and hashes
- checked that all POM files point to the same version
- verified that the source archives do not contains any binaries
- build the source release with Scala 2.12 and Scala 2.11 successfully
- manually verified the diff pom files between 1.9.0 and
Thanks Jincheng and Till, then let's keep on verifying the RC1.
Best,
Jark
On Wed, 9 Oct 2019 at 11:00, jincheng sun wrote:
> I think we should create the new RC when we find the blocker issues.
> We can looking forward the other check result, we can add the fix of
> FLINK-14315 in to 1.9.1
I think we should create the new RC when we find the blocker issues.
We can looking forward the other check result, we can add the fix of
FLINK-14315 in to 1.9.1 only we find the blockers.
Best,
Jincheng
Till Rohrmann 于2019年10月8日周二 下午8:20写道：
> FLINK-14315 has been merged into the release-1.9
FLINK-14315 has been merged into the release-1.9 branch. I've marked the
fix version of this ticket as 1.9.2. If we should create a new RC, then we
could include this fix. If this happens, then we need to update the fix
version to 1.9.1.
Cheers,
Till
On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 1:51 PM Till Rohrmann
If people already spent time on verifying the current RC I would also be
fine to release the fix for FLINK-14315 with Flink 1.9.2.
I will try to merge the PR as soon as possible. When I close the ticket, I
will update the fix version field to 1.9.2.
Cheers,
Till
On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 4:43 AM
Hi Zili,
Thanks for reminding me this, because of the Chinese National Day and Flink
Forward Europe,
we didn't receive any verification on the 1.9.1 RC1. And I guess we have to
extend the voting time after Flink Forward.
So I'm fine to have FLINK-14315 and rebuild another RC. What do you think
Hi Jark,
I notice a critical bug[1] is marked resolved in 1.9.1 but given 1.9.1
has been cut I'd like to throw the issue here so that we're sure
whether or not it is included in 1.9.1.
Best,
tison.
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-14315
Jark Wu 于2019年9月30日周一 下午3:25写道：
> Hi
Hi everyone,
Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the version 1.9.1,
as follows:
[ ] +1, Approve the release
[ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes:
* JIRA release notes [1],
17 matches
Mail list logo
