This vote is cancelled in favor of RC2.
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 3:18 PM, Ufuk Celebi wrote:
>
>> On 08 Feb 2016, at 15:13, Robert Metzger wrote:
>>
>> -1 (binding)
>>
>> the quickstart for 0.10.2 has the Flink version set to 0.10-SNAPSHOT, not
>> to 0.10.2.
>> https://repository.apache.org/conten
> On 08 Feb 2016, at 15:13, Robert Metzger wrote:
>
> -1 (binding)
>
> the quickstart for 0.10.2 has the Flink version set to 0.10-SNAPSHOT, not
> to 0.10.2.
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1060/org/apache/flink/flink-quickstart-java/0.10.2/flink-quickstart-j
-1 (binding)
the quickstart for 0.10.2 has the Flink version set to 0.10-SNAPSHOT, not
to 0.10.2.
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1060/org/apache/flink/flink-quickstart-java/0.10.2/flink-quickstart-java-0.10.2.jar
The same applies to the 0.10.2-hadoop1 version:
h
+1 (binding)
- build against Scala 2.11
- start-local (CLI, Webclient, Dashboard, log files, examples with build-in
and external data)
- start-cluster, local (2 JVMs, CLI + Webclient, Dashboard, log files,
examples with build-in and external data)
2016-02-07 20:21 GMT+01:00 Ufuk Celebi :
> +1 (b
+1 (binding)
- Checked checksums
- No binaries in source release
- Ran mvn clean verify
- Build for Hadoop 2.7
- Checked version in POM files
- Ran the start up scripts and examined log/out files
- Ran tests on multi-node cluster
- Tested with HDFS
- Tested command line client
- Ran examples on Y
+1 (binding)
- Built the code (Linux x64, Scala 2.10, Hadoop 2.3.0)
- Ran all tests
- Checked that there are no cross-version dependencies
- Checked that LICENSE and NOTICE are up to date
- Check planVisualizer util
- ran examples from command line
- tested web frontend on Firefox an
Fair enough
2016-02-05 14:09 GMT+01:00 Stephan Ewen :
> I would also be in favor of continuing the RC, if we find nothing more
> problematic
>
> On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 1:51 PM, Maximilian Michels wrote:
>
> > Thanks for the RC. The documentation version is a really minor issue
> > which most peo
I would also be in favor of continuing the RC, if we find nothing more
problematic
On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 1:51 PM, Maximilian Michels wrote:
> Thanks for the RC. The documentation version is a really minor issue
> which most people won't even notice because they use the online
> documentation. I
Thanks for the RC. The documentation version is a really minor issue
which most people won't even notice because they use the online
documentation. I wouldn't create a new RC just for fixing that.
On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 12:45 PM, Ufuk Celebi wrote:
>
>> On 05 Feb 2016, at 12:17, Fabian Hueske wr
> On 05 Feb 2016, at 12:17, Fabian Hueske wrote:
>
> I compared the RC1 branch to the release-0.10.2 tag and went over the diff
> (less than 2k changed lines, mostly added tests).
>
> Issues:
> - the docs/_config.yml needs to be updated to version 0.10.2
>
> Added / changed dependencies in pom
I compared the RC1 branch to the release-0.10.2 tag and went over the diff
(less than 2k changed lines, mostly added tests).
Issues:
- the docs/_config.yml needs to be updated to version 0.10.2
Added / changed dependencies in pom files:
- Kryo was added to flink-storm
- ASM was added to flink-gel
Dear Flink community,
Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Flink version
0.10.2.
Shared document to coordinate testing:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1oCOHwHwZNjHb7MX-qLvA61akEBOAxSIYo53MoygUqxQ/
The commit to be voted on:
3fcb91641118ba362b29a55e9102539e96852172
Bran
12 matches
Mail list logo
