Re: [2.0] How to handle on-going feature development in Flink 2.0?

2024-06-26 Thread Zakelly Lan
gt; > > > https://newrelic.com/sites/default/files/2024-04/new-relic-state-of-the-java-ecosystem-report-2024-04-30.pdf > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 4:58 AM David Radley < > david_rad...@uk.ibm.com> > > > > wrote: > > > &g

Re: [2.0] How to handle on-going feature development in Flink 2.0?

2024-06-26 Thread Jingsong Li
; elsewhere, but it would be good to be clear how this effects the > > > connectors > > > > and operator repos, with potentially v1 and v2 oriented new featuresI > > > > suspect this will be a connector by connector investigation. I am > > > thinking > > > &

Re: [2.0] How to handle on-going feature development in Flink 2.0?

2024-06-25 Thread Jark Wu
r investigation. I am > > thinking > > > connectors with Hadoop eco-system dependencies (e.g. Paimon) which may > > not > > > work nicely with Java 17, > > > > > > Kind regards, David. > > > > > > > > > From: Matthias Pohl &

Re: [2.0] How to handle on-going feature development in Flink 2.0?

2024-06-25 Thread Xintong Song
y, 25 June 2024 at 09:57 > > To: dev@flink.apache.org > > Cc: Xintong Song , martijnvis...@apache.org < > > martijnvis...@apache.org>, imj...@gmail.com , > > becket@gmail.com > > Subject: [EXTERNAL] [2.0] How to handle on-going feature development in >

Re: [2.0] How to handle on-going feature development in Flink 2.0?

2024-06-25 Thread Becket Qin
Kind regards, David. > > > From: Matthias Pohl > Date: Tuesday, 25 June 2024 at 09:57 > To: dev@flink.apache.org > Cc: Xintong Song , martijnvis...@apache.org < > martijnvis...@apache.org>, imj...@gmail.com , > becket@gmail.com > Subject: [EXTERNAL] [2.

Re: [2.0] How to handle on-going feature development in Flink 2.0?

2024-06-25 Thread David Radley
@gmail.com Subject: [EXTERNAL] [2.0] How to handle on-going feature development in Flink 2.0? Hi 2.0 release managers, With the 1.20 release branch being cut [1], master is now referring to 2.0-SNAPSHOT. I remember that, initially, the community had the idea of keeping the 2.0 release as small

[2.0] How to handle on-going feature development in Flink 2.0?

2024-06-25 Thread Matthias Pohl
Hi 2.0 release managers, With the 1.20 release branch being cut [1], master is now referring to 2.0-SNAPSHOT. I remember that, initially, the community had the idea of keeping the 2.0 release as small as possible focusing on API changes [2]. What does this mean for new features? I guess blocking