Re: Flink 1.15 Stabilisation Sync

2022-04-09 Thread Roman Khachatryan
; > > > > > ------ > > From:Robert Metzger > > Send Time:2022 Apr. 5 (Tue.) 13:34 > > To:dev > > Subject:Re: Flink 1.15 Stabilisation Sync > > > > Thanks a lot for the update. > > > > From

Re: Flink 1.15 Stabilisation Sync

2022-04-05 Thread Yuan Mei
ss the remaining > blockers. > > Best, > Yun Gao > > > -- > From:Robert Metzger > Send Time:2022 Apr. 5 (Tue.) 13:34 > To:dev > Subject:Re: Flink 1.15 Stabilisation Sync > > Thanks a lot for the update. > > From the burndown board [1] it seems that t

Re: Flink 1.15 Stabilisation Sync

2022-04-05 Thread Yun Gao
the remaining blockers. Best, Yun Gao -- From:Robert Metzger Send Time:2022 Apr. 5 (Tue.) 13:34 To:dev Subject:Re: Flink 1.15 Stabilisation Sync Thanks a lot for the update. From the burndown board [1] it seems that there's only one

Re: Flink 1.15 Stabilisation Sync

2022-04-04 Thread Robert Metzger
Thanks a lot for the update. >From the burndown board [1] it seems that there's only one blocker left, which has already a fix in review [2]. Are we also planning to address the open Critical tickets before opening the first voting release candidate? When do you expect 1.15 to be out? [1]

Flink 1.15 Stabilisation Sync

2022-03-28 Thread Johannes Moser
Dear Community, We are fairly on track with stabilising the 1.15 release, that’s why Yun Gao and me think we don’t need the sync anymore. So we skip it for now, starting from tomorrow. If the situation might change. We will let you know. Best, Joe

Re: Flink 1.15 Stabilisation Sync skipped tomorrow

2022-03-14 Thread Johannes Moser
Hi Gabor, We will cut the branch today. Best, Joe > On 11.03.2022, at 13:19, Gabor Somogyi wrote: > > Any news on the branch cut? The listed jira-s are closed as I see. > > G > > > On Tue, Mar 8, 2022 at 3:02 PM Galen Warren wrote: > >> You're welcome. Fwiw, I've also run through testing

Re: Flink 1.15 Stabilisation Sync skipped tomorrow

2022-03-11 Thread Gabor Somogyi
Any news on the branch cut? The listed jira-s are closed as I see. G On Tue, Mar 8, 2022 at 3:02 PM Galen Warren wrote: > You're welcome. Fwiw, I've also run through testing steps on my > contribution -- [FLINK-26451] Test GCS FileSystem w/ RecoverableWriter > manually - ASF JIRA (apache.org)

Re: Flink 1.15 Stabilisation Sync skipped tomorrow

2022-03-08 Thread Galen Warren
You're welcome. Fwiw, I've also run through testing steps on my contribution -- [FLINK-26451] Test GCS FileSystem w/ RecoverableWriter manually - ASF JIRA (apache.org) -- but I don't think I'm supposed to be officially doing manually testing on

Re: Flink 1.15 Stabilisation Sync skipped tomorrow

2022-03-08 Thread Johannes Moser
Thanks so much Gabor and Galen. Very much appreciated. > On 07.03.2022, at 19:00, Galen Warren wrote: > > I just ran through the testing steps on [FLINK-26462] Release Testing: > Running Python UDF in different Execution Mode - ASF JIRA (apache.org) >

Re: Flink 1.15 Stabilisation Sync skipped tomorrow

2022-03-07 Thread Galen Warren
I just ran through the testing steps on [FLINK-26462] Release Testing: Running Python UDF in different Execution Mode - ASF JIRA (apache.org) . Everything worked but I think there might be a typo in the steps to set up the tests, I left a comment

Re: Flink 1.15 Stabilisation Sync skipped tomorrow

2022-03-07 Thread Gabor Somogyi
Since I know this area I help to test FLINK-26468 . G On Mon, Mar 7, 2022 at 5:15 PM Johannes Moser wrote: > Hello, > > We will skip tomorrows weekly stabilisation sync. > It looks like all blockers are assigned and worked on. A significant >

Flink 1.15 Stabilisation Sync skipped tomorrow

2022-03-07 Thread Johannes Moser
Hello, We will skip tomorrows weekly stabilisation sync. It looks like all blockers are assigned and worked on. A significant number of contributors are on holiday tomorrow. Currently we plan to cut off the 1.15 branch on Wednesday of Thursday this week. In case you want to contribute