they are going to be removed for v2, it would be good to
> explicitly document the thinking and impact of the deprecations and
> consequent removals,
> Kind regards, David.
>
> From: Xuannan Su
> Date: Tuesday, 14 May 2024 at 02:08
> To: dev@flink.apache.org
> Su
: Improve Runtime Configuration
for Flink 2.0
Hi all,
Thank you for all the comments and suggestions! If there are no
further comments, I'd like to close the discussion and start the
voting in two days.
Best regards,
Xuannan
On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 3:10 PM Jeyhun Karimov wrote:
>
> Hi X
Hi all,
Thank you for all the comments and suggestions! If there are no
further comments, I'd like to close the discussion and start the
voting in two days.
Best regards,
Xuannan
On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 3:10 PM Jeyhun Karimov wrote:
>
> Hi Xuannan,
>
> Thanks a lot for the update. The FLIP
Hi Xuannan,
Thanks a lot for the update. The FLIP looks good to me. +1 for it.
Regards,
Jeyhun
On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 4:45 AM Xuannan Su wrote:
> Hi Jeyhun,
>
> Thanks for the comment!
>
> Yes, we intended to remove the StreamPiplineOptions in 2.0. I updated
> the FLIP to include the
Hi Jeyhun,
Thanks for the comment!
Yes, we intended to remove the StreamPiplineOptions in 2.0. I updated
the FLIP to include the information.
Best regards,
Xuannan
On Sun, May 12, 2024 at 9:16 PM Jeyhun Karimov wrote:
>
> Hi Xuannan,
>
> Thanks for driving this FLIP!
> I have a minor comment.
Hi Xuannan,
Thanks for driving this FLIP!
I have a minor comment. Do we plan to remove StreamPipelineOptions in 2.0,
as it only contains deprecated options?
Regards,
Jeyhun
On Sat, May 11, 2024 at 4:40 AM Rui Fan <1996fan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks Xuannan for the update!
>
> LGTM, +1 for
Thanks Xuannan for the update!
LGTM, +1 for this proposal.
Best,
Rui
On Sat, May 11, 2024 at 10:20 AM Xuannan Su wrote:
> Hi Rui,
>
> Thanks for the suggestion!
>
> I updated the description of
> taskmanager.network.memory.max-overdraft-buffers-per-gate and
> hard-coded it to 20.
>
> Best
Hi Rui,
Thanks for the suggestion!
I updated the description of
taskmanager.network.memory.max-overdraft-buffers-per-gate and
hard-coded it to 20.
Best regards,
Xuannan
On Mon, May 6, 2024 at 11:28 AM Rui Fan <1996fan...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks Xuannan for driving this proposal!
>
> >
Thanks Xuannan for driving this! +1 for this proposal.
Best,
Junrui
Rui Fan <1996fan...@gmail.com> 于2024年5月6日周一 11:27写道：
> Thanks Xuannan for driving this proposal!
>
> > taskmanager.network.memory.max-overdraft-buffers-per-gate will be removed
> and hard-coded to either 10 or 20.
>
>
Hi Xintong,
Thanks for the suggestion! I updated the FLIP to include a list of
related tasks.
Best regards,
Xuannan
On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 3:40 PM Xintong Song wrote:
>
> Thanks for driving this effort, Xuannan.
>
> +1 for the proposed changes.
>
> Just one suggestion: Some of the proposed
Thanks Xuannan for driving this proposal!
> taskmanager.network.memory.max-overdraft-buffers-per-gate will be removed
and hard-coded to either 10 or 20.
Currently, it's a public option. Could we determine the value of
the overdraft buffer in the current FLIP?
I vote 20 as the hard code value
Thanks for the effort, Xuannan.
+1 for the proposal.
Best,
Yuxin
Xintong Song 于2024年4月29日周一 15:40写道：
> Thanks for driving this effort, Xuannan.
>
> +1 for the proposed changes.
>
> Just one suggestion: Some of the proposed changes involve not solely
> changing the configuration options, but
Thanks for driving this effort, Xuannan.
+1 for the proposed changes.
Just one suggestion: Some of the proposed changes involve not solely
changing the configuration options, but are bound to changing / removal of
certain features. E.g., the removal of hash-blocking shuffle and legacy
hybrid
13 matches
Mail list logo
