+1
Looking forward to the functionality for a long time. With this feature,
our internal users can backfill
data with the same code and minimal change of configuration.
On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 3:08 AM Kostas Kloudas wrote:
> +1
>
> My only suggestion (although by no means a blocker) would be
+1
My only suggestion (although by no means a blocker) would be to remove
from the FLIP the `env.setRuntimeMode()` method.
I say that because this is syntactic sugar over the `env.configure()`
with the `execution.runtime-mode` option set to BATCH or STREAMING.
These methods can be nice but they
+1
Thanks for the discussion. Looking forward to seeing this all come to pass!
David
On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 9:28 AM Guowei Ma wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Best,
> Guowei
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 3:03 PM Yun Gao
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > Very thanks for bring this up! And
+1 (non-binding)
Best,
Guowei
On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 3:03 PM Yun Gao
wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Very thanks for bring this up! And the FLIP is indeed necessary for stream
> & batch unification.
>
> --
> Sender:Dawid
+1 (non-binding)
Very thanks for bring this up! And the FLIP is indeed necessary for stream &
batch unification.
--
Sender:Dawid Wysakowicz
Date:2020/09/16 15:01:08
Recipient:; Aljoscha Krettek
Theme:Re: [VOTE] FLIP-134: Batch
+1 (binding)
On 14/09/2020 14:25, Aljoscha Krettek wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> After the discussion in [1], I would like to open a voting thread for
> FLIP-134 (https://s.apache.org/FLIP-134) [2] which discusses a new
> BATCH execution mode for the DataStream API.
>
> The vote will be open until
