in context:
> http://apache-flink-incubator-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/Java-Primitive-Collections-in-Flink-tp563p2614.html
> Sent from the Apache Flink (Incubator) Mailing List archive. mailing list
> archive at Nabble.com.
-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/Java-Primitive-Collections-in-Flink-tp563p2611.html
Sent from the Apache Flink (Incubator) Mailing List archive. mailing list
archive at Nabble.com.
message in context:
http://apache-flink-incubator-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/Java-Primitive-Collections-in-Flink-tp563p2614.html
Sent from the Apache Flink (Incubator) Mailing List archive. mailing list
archive at Nabble.com.
es. You can bench mark and see what works best.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://apache-flink-incubator-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/Java-Primitive-Collections-in-Flink-tp563p2612.html
> Sent from the Apache Flink (Incubator) Mailing Li
/Java-Primitive-Collections-in-Flink-tp563p2612.html
Sent from the Apache Flink (Incubator) Mailing List archive. mailing list
archive at Nabble.com.
I agree with Sean. Fastutil does all sorts of combinations of primitive key
and value types, blowing the number of classes up.
If you only need a simple growing array of primitive longs, it may be
simpler to just implement it yourself.
It's own implementation of a primitive map. The needs were limited,
and two Scala classes did the trick.
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 9:18 AM, Robert Metzger wrote:
> What did Spark use instead of fastutil?
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 9:40 AM, Sean Owen wrote:
>
>> A word of caution -- fastutil is
What did Spark use instead of fastutil?
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 9:40 AM, Sean Owen wrote:
> A word of caution -- fastutil is a massive library, 20MB or so and 10K
> files if I recall correctly. It was pulled out of Spark just because
> it was making the deployment jars huge (and wasn't used muc
A word of caution -- fastutil is a massive library, 20MB or so and 10K
files if I recall correctly. It was pulled out of Spark just because
it was making the deployment jars huge (and wasn't used much). Make
sure it's worth it.
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 8:33 AM, Robert Waury
wrote:
> Okay,
>
> I'm
Okay,
I'm going to add fastutil to the dependencies in my next pull request.
Cheers,
Robert
On Jun 20, 2014 8:52 AM, "Sebastian Schelter" wrote:
> +1 for fastutils
>
>
> On 06/20/2014 08:50 AM, Robert Metzger wrote:
>
>> Hi Robert,
>>
>> The Apache Commons Primitives Collection project seems to
+1 for fastutils
On 06/20/2014 08:50 AM, Robert Metzger wrote:
Hi Robert,
The Apache Commons Primitives Collection project seems to be pretty
inactive. The last release was in 2003, there are many dead links on the
website. I would not suggest to use it.
HPPC and fastutil seem pretty similar t
Hi Robert,
The Apache Commons Primitives Collection project seems to be pretty
inactive. The last release was in 2003, there are many dead links on the
website. I would not suggest to use it.
HPPC and fastutil seem pretty similar to me. Both have a somewhat active
mailing list and up-to-date relea
Hi,
I'm currently working on some code in Flink's runtime and want to use some
Java Primitive Collections to improve performance.
As fas as I can see no Primitive Collections library is in the dependencies
so I wanted to ask if anybody has any preferences or input on which library
the project sho
13 matches
Mail list logo
