The last time that we tried this, everything worked fine
on UNIX but broke on Windows. Please ensure that it works
for you. Do 'build test' and use 'sudo ngrep dtd' to make
sure that there is no network traffic.
ngrep.sf.net
-David
> Author: crossley
> Date: Fri Sep 30 23:16:38 2005
> New Revisi
Ross Gardler wrote:
> I've started to refactor the sitemaps to use the locationmap. I'm using
> the naming convention that Tim suggested during the first Forrest
> Tuesday (I've added his notes to the locationmap document in 0.8
> site-author).
I published the changes so that we can see the pro
In the meantime, committers can follow the instructions
at http://forrest.zones.apache.org/ to ssh and view the logs.
-David
David Crossley wrote:
> Ross Gardler wrote:
> > Juan Jose Pablos wrote:
> > >Hi,
> > >I think that it would be positive to publish these logs on the web so
> > >you would k
Just a quick update:
There will be a Hackathon on Dec 10 and 11 that is open to all people
interested on working with us on Forrest documentation.
My tutorial is scheduled for the morning of Dec 10 (if it happens),
after that I'd have time to join in for the rest of the day and the
day after.
U
Ross Gardler wrote:
> {forrest:stylesheets}/upgrade-skinconf.xsl
> would become something like:
> transform.skinconf.new-skinconf
I find the second version clearer and I think it
would be a good idea to use such a naming convention as consistently
as possible.
--
Ferdinand Soethe
Thorsten Scherler wrote:
>> This was confirmed in response to my recent suggestions to create all
>> new features in separate branches that can be integrated (and
>> released) as soon as they are stable.
> Merging different branches that are have to go to the core are *not*
> possible, merging
You are correct. People need to do the work if they
have the energy to initiate a release. Other people
will follow and help. Same in every open source project.
And no-one needs to feel guilty for not helping.
When it happens it happens. If not then we will continue
on until the momentum gains.
-D
Thorsten Scherler wrote:
> Ross Gardler escribi??:
> > Thorsten Scherler wrote:
> > > Why do we want to release 0.8, now?
> >
> > release early, release often. This was discussed and agreed a month or
> > so ago.
>
> +1
>
> e.g. views reached their first stable version as prototype. Everything
>
Ross Gardler wrote:
> I am making no cuts and no inline comments, it would be a crime to mess
> with the message Diwaker is sending here. Thank you, Diwaker, you are
> right on target.
>
> Ross
>
>
> Diwaker Gupta wrote:
> >>No offense to anyone but if s
I've started to refactor the sitemaps to use the locationmap. I'm using
the naming convention that Tim suggested during the first Forrest
Tuesday (I've added his notes to the locationmap document in 0.8
site-author).
At the time I agreed to the convention, however, I'm not so sure
anymore. He
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: rgardler
Date: Fri Sep 30 18:24:45 2005
New Revision: 292891
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=292891&view=rev
Log:
refactor resolving of 'skin' stylesheets to use locationmap
I've not done the equivalent in the new forrest:views plugins because I
didn't
I am making no cuts and no inline comments, it would be a crime to mess
with the message Diwaker is sending here. Thank you, Diwaker, you are
right on target.
Ross
Diwaker Gupta wrote:
No offense to anyone but if somebody wants to release 0.8 as -
refactored sitemaps to utilise locationmap, t
> No offense to anyone but if somebody wants to release 0.8 as -
> refactored sitemaps to utilise locationmap, then we (or better this
> somebody) has to put some more work into it. It cannot be that we expect
> from the usual suspects that they now as well put more work into that
> part of forrest
El vie, 30-09-2005 a las 16:40 +0200, Ferdinand Soethe escribió:
...
> This was confirmed in response to my recent suggestions to create all
> new features in separate branches that can be integrated (and
> released) as soon as they are stable.
Merging different branches that are have to go to the
Thorsten Scherler wrote:
El vie, 30-09-2005 a las 17:08 +0100, Ross Gardler escribió:
Thorsten Scherler wrote:
Why do we want to release 0.8, now?
release early, release often. This was discussed and agreed a month or
so ago.
+1
...
Besides, the locationmap is, in itself, a very powe
El vie, 30-09-2005 a las 17:08 +0100, Ross Gardler escribió:
> Thorsten Scherler wrote:
> > Why do we want to release 0.8, now?
>
> release early, release often. This was discussed and agreed a month or
> so ago.
+1
e.g. views reached their first stable version as prototype. Everything
that is c
Thorsten Scherler wrote:
Why do we want to release 0.8, now?
release early, release often. This was discussed and agreed a month or
so ago.
I thought we said we need to refactor the whole lot but now we want
again release partial work?
Refactor the whole lot for a 1.0 release, yes, but the
Ferdinand Soethe wrote:
I agree with everything you say re release early, release often (I have
a mail in my drafts folder I will send in a moment, I wanted to hear a
couple of other opinions before sending it).
Btw: Please also re-consider Tim's excellent mail about doing the
refactori
On Friday 30 September 2005 2:47 am, Ross Gardler wrote:
> If we can get just three people to drop in at the same time that owuld
> be great. So we are not wasting our time we could use the session to
> write a How-To on doing collaborative meetings. Please raise your hand
> if you will attend (mee
Ross Gardler wrote:
>
> If we can get just three people to drop in at the same time that owuld
> be great. So we are not wasting our time we could use the session to
> write a How-To on doing collaborative meetings. Please raise your hand
> if you will attend (meeting time being suitable of cou
Need to highlight words in your Forrest documents? Perhaps you want to
link to a glossary file from keywords. Take a look at
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-dev&m=112808044409169&w=2
Ross
Thorsten Scherler wrote:
>
> Why do we want to release 0.8, now?
One reason is that we agreed a while ago that
we should release more often. We also have an
improved Cocoon underneath. Features are easier
for users to grasp in small stages.
> I thought we said we need to refactor the whole lot bu
David Crossley wrote:
Ross Gardler wrote:
...
We should do parallel development on the 0.8/0.9 releases and the
views/xhtml2 work (done in plugins, yes I changed my mind).
What caused you to change your mind?
You almost had me convinced that doing the work
in a development branch was the
Anil Ramnanan wrote:
I am continuing work on the Eclipse plugin and I would like to convert
the current editors to multipage editors. Basically, a multpage editor
will contain two (or more) views. My idea is to have a view for the
source code as well as a view for the tree view/content outline
Ross Gardler wrote:
> Ferdinand Soethe wrote:
> >Ross Gardler wrote:
> >
> >>>Are you gonna suggest the new release or should I?
> >
> >>http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=forrest-dev&m=111986901417286&w=2
> >
> >Sorry, I was a bit terse.
> >
> >What I meant to say is exactly along the lines that Ross
Ross Gardler wrote:
> David Crossley wrote:
> >Ross Gardler wrote:
> >>Diwaker Gupta wrote:
> >>>Thorsten Scherler wrote:
> >>>
> >Added two new plugins for
> >refactoring views into the core:
> >- structurer
> >- themes
> >
> >Recent changes to views with using jxtg as core
Thorsten Scherler wrote:
> Why do we want to release 0.8, now?
> I thought we said we need to refactor the whole lot but now we want
> again release partial work? We have ongoing discussions about opening
> new branches, doing the work in plugins, ...
We already have an agreement to do small re
Hi HANNAX, would you please take care when you respond
to email. You seem to add extra "Re:" to the subject line
and that makes it very hard to follow the email
discussion.
-David
Thanx, of course I'll stay :)
__
PÔVODNÁ SPRÁVA
Od: "Thorsten Scherler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Pre: dev@forrest.apache.org
Predmet: RE: Re: lost with voice plugin
Dátum/Čas: 30. 9. 2005 14:54:35
> Hanax,
>
> I will take care of the v
| If we can get just three people to drop in at the same time that owuld
| be great. So we are not wasting our time we could use the session to
| write a How-To on doing collaborative meetings. Please raise your hand
| if you will attend (meeting time being suitable of course).
|
| Ross
Count
I am continuing work on the Eclipse plugin and I would like to convert
the current editors to multipage editors. Basically, a multpage editor
will contain two (or more) views. My idea is to have a view for the
source code as well as a view for the tree view/content outline. The
advantage of a
Hanax,
I will take care of the voice plugin and report to the list.
Please stay with us. ;-)
salu2
El vie, 30-09-2005 a las 14:31 +0200, HANAX escribió:
> ok, it's at "Troubles with views and voice plugin", sorry for double
> attaching files... anyway why only admin can delete attachments?
>
ok, it's at "Troubles with views and voice plugin", sorry for double attaching
files... anyway why only admin can delete attachments?
__
PÔVODNÁ SPRÁVA
Od: "Ross Gardler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Pre: dev@forrest.apache.org
Predmet: Re
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOR-683?page=all ]
Tom HANAX updated FOR-683:
--
Attachment: voice-markup.ft
voice.fv
Currently it doesn't work, please chceck it...
> Troubles with views and voice plugin
> -
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOR-683?page=all ]
Tom HANAX updated FOR-683:
--
Attachment: voice.fv
> Troubles with views and voice plugin
>
>
> Key: FOR-683
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/brow
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOR-683?page=all ]
Tom HANAX updated FOR-683:
--
Attachment: voice-markup.ft
> Troubles with views and voice plugin
>
>
> Key: FOR-683
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/ji
Troubles with views and voice plugin
Key: FOR-683
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOR-683
Project: Forrest
Type: Task
Components: Plugins (general issues)
Environment: Windows
Reporter: Tom HANAX
Priority: B
Why do we want to release 0.8, now?
I thought we said we need to refactor the whole lot but now we want
again release partial work? We have ongoing discussions about opening
new branches, doing the work in plugins, ...
Sorry, but it is starting to get real confusing.
We need a final decision ba
Done.
BTW using --force for svn is evil because it will haunt you! ;-) I
needed to delete a contract that I once added/modified with --force.
Log:
cd
$FORREST_HOME/whiteboard/plugins/org.apache.forrest.plugin.internal.view
svn merge -r HEAD:280939
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/forrest/trunk/w
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOR-513?page=all ]
Ross Gardler closed FOR-513:
Resolution: Fixed
I can cnfirm this is fixed with the latest SVN head.
Be sure to:
svn up
cd main
./build.sh clean
./build.sh build
> Messages from Cocoon about "L
Ferdinand Soethe wrote:
Ross Gardler wrote:
Are you gonna suggest the new release or should I?
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=forrest-dev&m=111986901417286&w=2
Sorry, I was a bit terse.
What I meant to say is exactly along the lines that Ross quoted here
(thanks, I'll add the title of
Ross Gardler wrote:
>> Are you gonna suggest the new release or should I?
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=forrest-dev&m=111986901417286&w=2
Sorry, I was a bit terse.
What I meant to say is exactly along the lines that Ross quoted here
(thanks, I'll add the title of Mc. Quickfind :-)).
In ot
Sjur Moshagen wrote:
Den 29. sep. 2005 kl. 20.10 skrev Nicola Ken Barozzi:
In this way during real-time collaborative sessions, we can all code
together, or see others code.
http://socialsoftware.weblogsinc.com/entry/1234000410060570/
http://gobby.0x539.de/
Nice! (shame it is GPL, but we ca
HANAX wrote:
OK, after many readings and new informations I give up... :(
I can't make it run, currently I see error
Request URI index.html cause Lexical error at line 1, column 1. Encountered: "{" (123), after : ""
I've attached simplified versions of my voice.fv and voice-markup.ft files, c
Ferdinand Soethe wrote:
Thorsten Scherler wrote:
I reverted the plugins and keep working on the new plugins till we
settle this discussion about branching or not.
That makes user and dev using views like they were used to do before.
Are you gonna suggest the new release or should I
Thorsten Scherler a écrit :
Why do you not write a contract?
I know, I cannot generate anymore my view site since FOR-675... :-(
I don't have the skill to help you on this problem of
commons-jxpath-/ver/.jar
So I subscribed to this FOR and I am working on my skinned site at the
moment.
I
46 matches
Mail list logo
