Re: Forrestbar = cool tool

2005-11-03 Thread David Crossley
Ross Gardler wrote: > > Why not put a version in the 0.7 branch which only has 0.7 features then > keep a version in trunk which is for the trunk version? > > It's not a huge issue, just a convenience. The issue is *only* that the website documentation and this tool forrestbar.xpi is produced f

Re: "Access is denied"

2005-11-03 Thread Ross Gardler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I can generate Seed without the error, unless I include wholesite.pdf, which will also cause the problem. Thanks for moving this to dev list. Does your site use wholesite.pdf as well? Does your site have a custom sitemap? If you do "forrest run" in your site can you

"Access is denied"

2005-11-03 Thread greg.vaco
I can generate Seed without the error, unless I include wholesite.pdf, which will also cause the problem. > > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 2005/11/03 Thu AM 09:23:27 EST > To: > Subject: "Access is denied" errors > > > After upgrading to Head (r33054), I started receiving this error: >

Re: [Contracts inclusion ?]

2005-11-03 Thread Thorsten Scherler
WARNING: What I now say is pure theory!!! I have not tested it!!! El jue, 03-11-2005 a las 16:37 +0100, Cyriaque Dupoirieux escribió: > Hi, > > I wander, > Is there a way to include - kind of inheritance - a contract into > another - just like we did with common stylesheets for skinned f

[Contracts inclusion ?]

2005-11-03 Thread Cyriaque Dupoirieux
Hi, I wander, Is there a way to include - kind of inheritance - a contract into another - just like we did with common stylesheets for skinned forrest ? Salutations, Cyriaque,

Re: machine spec for forrest run

2005-11-03 Thread Thorsten Scherler
El jue, 03-11-2005 a las 12:25 +, Ross Gardler escribió: > Thorsten Scherler wrote: > > El jue, 03-11-2005 a las 09:59 +, Ross Gardler escribió: > > > >>Kevin wrote: > >> > >>>Does anyone have a performance problem using forrest run. > >>>My test is on the main index page of seed-v2. > >>

Re: machine spec for forrest run

2005-11-03 Thread Ross Gardler
Thorsten Scherler wrote: El jue, 03-11-2005 a las 09:59 +, Ross Gardler escribió: Kevin wrote: Does anyone have a performance problem using forrest run. My test is on the main index page of seed-v2. I'm not using views 2, so cannot comment directly. However, it is known that there are

Re: Forrestbar = cool tool

2005-11-03 Thread Ross Gardler
Thorsten Scherler wrote: El jue, 03-11-2005 a las 09:57 +, Ross Gardler escribió: David Crossley wrote: Ross Gardler wrote: David Crossley wrote: Ferdinand Soethe wrote: +1 Where can wwe find it? http://forrest.apache.org/tools/forrestbar.html However, we have a problem. The

Re: improving menus and linking (Was: vague issues with Forrest use)

2005-11-03 Thread Paul Bolger
not sure what happened there - Gmail hiccup! My apologies. On 11/3/05, Paul Bolger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > As for mangling the names to get the right order - it makes me shudder!! > > Although I've found for big sites it's not a bad idea to use the ISO > date-of-creation/page-subject-event

Re: [Root variable ?]

2005-11-03 Thread Thorsten Scherler
El jue, 03-11-2005 a las 11:51 +0100, Cyriaque Dupoirieux escribió: > Hi, > > When using the ProjectInfo plugin - with the structurer v2 -, it > seems that the variable $root is not transmitted to contracts. > Where does this variable come from ? > > Salutations, > Cyriaque, > $forr

[Root variable ?]

2005-11-03 Thread Cyriaque Dupoirieux
Hi, When using the ProjectInfo plugin - with the structurer v2 -, it seems that the variable $root is not transmitted to contracts. Where does this variable come from ? Salutations, Cyriaque,

Re: Forrestbar = cool tool

2005-11-03 Thread Cyriaque Dupoirieux
Thorsten Scherler a écrit : El jue, 03-11-2005 a las 09:57 +, Ross Gardler escribió: David Crossley wrote: Ross Gardler wrote: David Crossley wrote: Ferdinand Soethe wrote: +1 Where can wwe find it? http://forrest.apache.org/tools/for

Re: machine spec for forrest run

2005-11-03 Thread Thorsten Scherler
El jue, 03-11-2005 a las 09:59 +, Ross Gardler escribió: > Kevin wrote: > > Does anyone have a performance problem using forrest run. > > My test is on the main index page of seed-v2. > > I'm not using views 2, so cannot comment directly. However, it is known > that there are lots of performa

Re: improving menus and linking (Was: vague issues with Forrest use)

2005-11-03 Thread Paul Bolger
> As for mangling the names to get the right order - it makes me shudder!! Although I've found for big sites it's not a bad idea to use the ISO date-of-creation/page-subject-event as the first part of your file name anyway, particularly for content such as news stories, press releases, articles. I

Re: Forrestbar = cool tool

2005-11-03 Thread Thorsten Scherler
El jue, 03-11-2005 a las 09:57 +, Ross Gardler escribió: > David Crossley wrote: > > Ross Gardler wrote: > > > >>David Crossley wrote: > >> > >>>Ferdinand Soethe wrote: > >>> > >>> > +1 > Where can wwe find it? > >>> > >>>http://forrest.apache.org/tools/forrestbar.html > >>> > >>>Howev

Re: improving menus and linking (Was: vague issues with Forrest use)

2005-11-03 Thread Ross Gardler
Paul Bolger wrote: As for mangling the names to get the right order - it makes me shudder!! Although I've found for big sites it's not a bad idea to use the ISO date-of-creation/page-subject-event as the first part of your file name anyway, particularly for content such as news stories, press

Re: machine spec for forrest run

2005-11-03 Thread Ross Gardler
Kevin wrote: Does anyone have a performance problem using forrest run. My test is on the main index page of seed-v2. I'm not using views 2, so cannot comment directly. However, it is known that there are lots of performance issues with views 2. The tentative plan is to move much of the heavy

Re: Forrestbar = cool tool

2005-11-03 Thread Ross Gardler
David Crossley wrote: Ross Gardler wrote: David Crossley wrote: Ferdinand Soethe wrote: +1 Where can wwe find it? http://forrest.apache.org/tools/forrestbar.html However, we have a problem. The version in trunk has now gained stuff that is only relevant to 0.8-dev One more thing to do