Brian M Dube wrote:
> David Crossley wrote:
> > Brian M Dube wrote:
> > > >
> > > > FOR-1172 - enable validation of the internal xml
> > > >
> > > > FOR-1173 - add demonstration of using xml source documents
> > > > without declaring a DTD
> > >
> > > This looks good. Is the idea to replace the
On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 05:49:57PM +1000, David Crossley wrote:
> Brian M Dube wrote:
> > >
> > > FOR-1172 - enable validation of the internal xml
> > >
> > > FOR-1173 - add demonstration of using xml source documents
> > > without declaring a DTD
> >
> > This looks good. Is the idea to replace
Brian M Dube wrote:
> >
> > FOR-1172 - enable validation of the internal xml
> >
> > FOR-1173 - add demonstration of using xml source documents
> > without declaring a DTD
>
> This looks good. Is the idea to replace the Ant target with pipeline
> validation?
I don't know. I like the fact that t
On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 01:30:26AM +1000, David Crossley wrote:
> David Crossley wrote:
> > Brian M Dube wrote:
> > >
> > > There will always be one more place in the DTD to add this
> > > support.
> >
> > Yes, that worried me too when the initial XInclude
> > was added to the DTD.
> > http://iss
David Crossley wrote:
>
> Still need to get XInclude processing done a bit earlier
> in the sitemaps.
That is done now. See r781260.
-David
David Crossley wrote:
> Brian M Dube wrote:
> >
> > There will always be one more place in the DTD to add this
> > support.
>
> Yes, that worried me too when the initial XInclude
> was added to the DTD.
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOR-1032
>
> > I found a very old discussion [1] about
Brian M Dube wrote:
>
> There will always be one more place in the DTD to add this
> support.
Yes, that worried me too when the initial XInclude
was added to the DTD.
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOR-1032
> I found a very old discussion [1] about processing XInclude
> before validation.
David Crossley wrote:
XInclude is now added to the document-v20 DTD.
See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOR-1032
Thanks to the newcomers who made this happen (and the old timers who
committed the work).
This is an important addition to Forrest.
Ross
XInclude is now added to the document-v20 DTD.
See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOR-1032
-David
Carlos Tejo Alonso wrote:
For a very long time we have intending to move to a subset of XHTML
2. But planning and doing are two different things. We need someone
with a suitably strong need to solve the problems posed by XDoc to
actually do it.
Maybe, we should start to think to do it. Could
> >>> 18. - [code] Migrate to a decent schema language, primarily
> >> so that we can
> >>> use namespaces in XML docs, allowing things like XInclude,
> >> in-line metadata,
> >>> in-line SVG, Jelly snippets, or anything else users can
> >> make a Transformer
> >>> for. → open
> >>>
> >>> So it
David Crossley wrote:
Ross Gardler wrote:
Gavin wrote:
From: Brian M Dube
Ross Gardler wrote:
Brian M Dube wrote:
Gavin wrote:
Well this seemed to pass my tests locally, its late I'll look in the
morning
and either fix it or revert.
I committed r678217 to suppress validation on samples-b/x
Ross Gardler wrote:
> Gavin wrote:
> >> From: Brian M Dube
> >> Ross Gardler wrote:
> >>> Brian M Dube wrote:
> Gavin wrote:
>
> > Well this seemed to pass my tests locally, its late I'll look in the
> > morning
> > and either fix it or revert.
>
> I committed r67821
Carlos Tejo Alonso wrote:
Hi,
18. - [code] Migrate to a decent schema language, primarily
so that we can
use namespaces in XML docs, allowing things like XInclude,
in-line metadata,
in-line SVG, Jelly snippets, or anything else users can
make a Transformer
for. → open
So it seems that is
Hi,
> > 18. - [code] Migrate to a decent schema language, primarily
> so that we can
> > use namespaces in XML docs, allowing things like XInclude,
> in-line metadata,
> > in-line SVG, Jelly snippets, or anything else users can
> make a Transformer
> > for. → open
> >
> > So it seems that is n
Gavin wrote:
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Brian M Dube [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Sunday, 20 July 2008 7:19 AM
>> To: dev@forrest.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: XInclude
>>
>> Ross Gardler wrote:
>>> Brian M Dube wrote:
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Brian M Dube [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, 20 July 2008 7:19 AM
> To: dev@forrest.apache.org
> Subject: Re: XInclude
>
> Ross Gardler wrote:
> > Brian M Dube wrote:
> >> Gavin wrote:
> >>> Well thi
Ross Gardler wrote:
Brian M Dube wrote:
Gavin wrote:
Well this seemed to pass my tests locally, its late I'll look in the
morning
and either fix it or revert.
I committed r678217 to suppress validation on samples-b/xinclude.xml.
-1
Obscuring a bad commit is not good practice. We should re
Brian M Dube wrote:
Gavin wrote:
Well this seemed to pass my tests locally, its late I'll look in the
morning
and either fix it or revert.
I committed r678217 to suppress validation on samples-b/xinclude.xml.
-1
Obscuring a bad commit is not good practice. We should revert the
offending c
Jim Dixon wrote:
On Mon, 11 Sep 2006, Ross Gardler wrote:
A better approach would be to process the XIncludes before validation,
stripping off the xlmns:xi attribute from the document element and
replacing xi:includes with whatever they resolve to. This should be
cheaper than it might seem: u
On Mon, 11 Sep 2006, Ross Gardler wrote:
> A better approach would be to process the XIncludes before validation,
> stripping off the xlmns:xi attribute from the document element and
> replacing xi:includes with whatever they resolve to. This should be
> cheaper than it might
Ross Gardler wrote:
Jim Dixon wrote:
On Fri, 8 Sep 2006, Ross Gardler wrote:
I've thought about this a bit more. One of the problems here is that
adding xi:include elements has unexpected results.
If the DTD is extended as above, then the validator will, I think, not
check beyond the xi:in
Jim Dixon wrote:
On Fri, 8 Sep 2006, Ross Gardler wrote:
I've thought about this a bit more. One of the problems here is that
adding xi:include elements has unexpected results.
If the DTD is extended as above, then the validator will, I think, not
check beyond the xi:include element, and so
On Mon, 11 Sep 2006, David Crossley wrote:
> There are two different situations where xml is parsed.
>
> One situation is the Cocoon/Forrest processing of xml contnet.
>
> The other situation is the 'forrest validate-xdocs' target.
> This latter is an Ant target. See $FORREST_HOME/main/targets/val
There are two different situations where xml is parsed.
One situation is the Cocoon/Forrest processing of xml contnet.
The other situation is the 'forrest validate-xdocs' target.
This latter is an Ant target. See $FORREST_HOME/main/targets/validate.xml
This uses the Ant task "xmlvalidate". This c
On Fri, 8 Sep 2006, Ross Gardler wrote:
> > I've thought about this a bit more. One of the problems here is that
> > adding xi:include elements has unexpected results.
> >
> > If the DTD is extended as above, then the validator will, I think, not
> > check beyond the xi:include element, and so a
Jim Dixon wrote:
On Fri, 8 Sep 2006, Ross Gardler wrote:
-
%document;
http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude";
I don't think we need to create a version 2.1 for this to be honest. I
know we *should* but it is an optional e
On Fri, 8 Sep 2006, Ross Gardler wrote:
> > -
> >
> > > "-//APACHE//ENTITIES Documentation V2.0//EN"
> > "document-v20.dtd">
> > %document;
> >
> > > xmlns:xi CDATA #FIXED "http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude";
> >
>
(I'm moving this to the dev list, now we got past user issues)
Jim Dixon wrote:
On Wed, 6 Sep 2006, Ross Gardler wrote:
This remains uncomfortable, however. There appears to be no way to use
XInclude without introducing a new DTD.
That is correct. You can use a DTD that allows the xi:inclu
29 matches
Mail list logo
