RE: Proposed Java version 1.4 and FOR-765

2007-03-28 Thread Thorsten Scherler
On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 17:11 +0800, Gav wrote: ... > > I came to the conclusion that we should stick to 1.4 as a minimum > recommended version for this release and with me having no > other issues gave my +1. > > If it turns out that Issue FOR-765 really does need Jave 1.5 then > we need to co

RE: Proposed Java version 1.4 and FOR-765

2007-03-28 Thread Gav....
> -Original Message- > From: David Crossley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, 28 March 2007 10:43 AM > To: dev@forrest.apache.org > Subject: Re: Proposed Java version 1.4 and FOR-765 > > Thorsten Scherler wrote: > > David Crossley wrote: > >

Re: Proposed Java version 1.4 and FOR-765

2007-03-28 Thread Ross Gardler
David Crossley wrote: Thorsten Scherler wrote: David Crossley wrote: ... Proposed Java version to test this release is Java 1.4 Thanks for following up. This is something that we need to decide as part of the Release Plan. I see that people are already saying yes. https://issues.apache.org/

Re: Proposed Java version 1.4 and FOR-765

2007-03-27 Thread David Crossley
Thorsten Scherler wrote: > David Crossley wrote: > ... > > > Proposed Java version to test this release is Java 1.4 Thanks for following up. This is something that we need to decide as part of the Release Plan. I see that people are already saying yes. > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOR-