Ross Gardler wrote:
> This is a good idea, but I recommend we wait on this second proposal
> until we have the 0.8 docs in place. This will happen immediately after
> the 0.7 release. I propose this because there will be very little
> content, and therefore very little value for the 0.7 relea
Ferdinand Soethe wrote:
Ross Gardler wrote:
...
In my opinion what should happen is that the relevant chapter outline
should be ripped out of the proposal and put into SVN as XHTML documents
that we can point to via an URL to SVN. With our recent influx of offers
for help on beginner docume
Ross Gardler wrote:
> I am thoroughly confused by the discussion and can only
> assume that it is a potential issue with the German publishers.
Correct.
> What Ferdinand is proposing to donate to Forrest is just the outline of
> a book. About half of this book is of no interest to a documentati
David Crossley wrote:
Ferdinand Soethe wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
If you tell the list what your general aim is then
we can see what any legal issues might be. We can also
seek help from the Apache "legal-discuss" mailing list.
It is actually quite simple to describe:
I want to donate t
Ferdinand Soethe wrote:
> David Crossley wrote:
>
> > If you tell the list what your general aim is then
> > we can see what any legal issues might be. We can also
> > seek help from the Apache "legal-discuss" mailing list.
>
> It is actually quite simple to describe:
>
> I want to donate the co
David Crossley wrote:
> If you tell the list what your general aim is then
> we can see what any legal issues might be. We can also
> seek help from the Apache "legal-discuss" mailing list.
It is actually quite simple to describe:
I want to donate the concept for the English language version of
Ferdinand Soethe wrote:
>
> I just took another look at the legalese and realized that I have not
> idea what the implication in such a case would be. So I'll try and
> modify the concept enough for us to work with it w/o any copyright
> problems.
If you tell the list what your general aim is the
I just took another look at the legalese and realized that I have not
idea what the implication in such a case would be. So I'll try and
modify the concept enough for us to work with it w/o any copyright
problems.
--
Ferdinand Soethe
David Crossley wrote:
> Actually Ferdinand, this discussion should be happening on the dev list.
Fine by me. Here it is.
> Ferdinand Soethe wrote:
>> As you might know Ross and I have put considerable time into working
>> on a chapter structure for a book on Single Source Publishing with
>> For
