Re: does checksums-uri in cli.conf work?

2005-06-05 Thread Ferdinand Soethe
David Crossley wrote: > As we already said, cocoon-users list. Ta. I read that I just wanted to make sure that this is our problem before I ask them. And since there was more than one feature not working that seemed a remote possibility :-) Did search for 'checksums-uri' on Google, on all the l

Re: does checksums-uri in cli.conf work?

2005-06-05 Thread David Crossley
Ferdinand Soethe wrote: > Trying to test the checksums-uri in cli.conf, I got really confused > and I'm not sure what is happening. Did I miss something or are there > indeed several nonfunctional settings in cli.conf? > > I'd appreciate some comments on this. As we already said, cocoon-users lis

Re: does checksums-uri in cli.conf work?

2005-06-05 Thread David Crossley
Ross Gardler wrote: > Ferdinand Soethe wrote: > >David Crossley wrote: > > > >>Cocoon-related questions would get better answers on cocoon-users. > > > >Is there an easy way to do this w/o subscribing to their list? My > >mailbox is already getting a bit crowded :-) You might be able to send email

Re: does checksums-uri in cli.conf work?

2005-06-05 Thread Ferdinand Soethe
Trying to test the checksums-uri in cli.conf, I got really confused and I'm not sure what is happening. Did I miss something or are there indeed several nonfunctional settings in cli.conf? I'd appreciate some comments on this. Regards, Ferdinand Soethe Here is what I did 1. Seeded a new forrest

Re: does checksums-uri in cli.conf work?

2005-06-03 Thread Ross Gardler
Ferdinand Soethe wrote: David Crossley wrote: Cocoon-related questions would get better answers on cocoon-users. Is there an easy way to do this w/o subscribing to their list? My mailbox is already getting a bit crowded :-) A good place to start would be their archives. There may be so

Re: does checksums-uri in cli.conf work?

2005-06-03 Thread Ferdinand Soethe
David Crossley wrote: > Cocoon-related questions would get better answers on cocoon-users. Is there an easy way to do this w/o subscribing to their list? My mailbox is already getting a bit crowded :-) > One way to see if there are any side-effects, would be to create > two separate sites wi

Re: does checksums-uri in cli.conf work?

2005-06-02 Thread David Crossley
Ferdinand Soethe wrote: > Ross Gardler wrote: > > > Probably faster to try turning it on than for someone to type a reply (I > > don't know the answer by the way). > > My question was more about hidden side effects that I wouldn't find > through trial and error. But since nobody seems to know I'l

Re: does checksums-uri in cli.conf work?

2005-06-02 Thread Ferdinand Soethe
Ross Gardler wrote: > Probably faster to try turning it on than for someone to type a reply (I > don't know the answer by the way). My question was more about hidden side effects that I wouldn't find through trial and error. But since nobody seems to know I'll just try. -- Ferdinand Soethe

Re: does checksums-uri in cli.conf work?

2005-06-01 Thread Ross Gardler
Ferdinand Soethe wrote: In the default cli.conf I found this setting commented out. Are there reasons not to use that? It would probably allow synchronizing sites to a server with Eclipses' ftp-addon very efficiently. Probably faster to try turning it on than for someone to type a reply

does checksums-uri in cli.conf work?

2005-06-01 Thread Ferdinand Soethe
In the default cli.conf I found this setting commented out. Are there reasons not to use that? It would probably allow synchronizing sites to a server with Eclipses' ftp-addon very efficiently. -- Ferdinand Soethe