Wednesday, February 1, 2017, 9:36:41 AM, Julien NICOLAS wrote:
> On 28/01/2017 18:08, Daniel Dekany wrote:
>> So this meant to be kind of a survey, rather than a proper vote, and
>> for now we use the logo only on Twitter, and it can be changed
>> anytime. Here's what we have:
>>
>> Logos: https:/
On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 9:36 AM, Julien NICOLAS
wrote:
>
> I don't know what is needed but I transfert all rights of my logos to the
> freemarker project. :)
Julien has already filed a ICLA so we should be good with that.
Jacopo
On 28/01/2017 18:08, Daniel Dekany wrote:
So this meant to be kind of a survey, rather than a proper vote, and
for now we use the logo only on Twitter, and it can be changed
anytime. Here's what we have:
Logos: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B5BwTaGcWGtNS2VaTDhCcDVLQTQ
- #1: "" with the inf
+1 Looks good :)
2017-01-30 16:27 GMT+01:00 Daniel Dekany :
> I have just went ahead and replaced the logo on
> https://twitter.com/freemarker with #1.5.
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Daniel Dekany
>
>
> Saturday, January 28, 2017, 6:08:16 PM, Daniel Dekany wrote:
>
> > So this meant to be kind of a survey
I have just went ahead and replaced the logo on
https://twitter.com/freemarker with #1.5.
--
Thanks,
Daniel Dekany
Saturday, January 28, 2017, 6:08:16 PM, Daniel Dekany wrote:
> So this meant to be kind of a survey, rather than a proper vote, and
> for now we use the logo only on Twitter, and
Saturday, January 28, 2017, 6:08:16 PM, Daniel Dekany wrote:
[snip]
> I guess both the #1 and #2 votes would gravitate towards the more
> similar #1.5, rather than #1.
[snip]
I ment "rather than #3"...
--
Thanks,
Daniel Dekany
So this meant to be kind of a survey, rather than a proper vote, and
for now we use the logo only on Twitter, and it can be changed
anytime. Here's what we have:
Logos: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B5BwTaGcWGtNS2VaTDhCcDVLQTQ
- #1: "" with the infinitely long dropshadow, no gradients or such
On 19/01/2017 13:30, Daniel Dekany wrote:
A new choice! So now in theory I should cancel this vote and start a
new one. But I guess we can be less formal in this case. After all,
changing a logo is backward compatible (an almost disturbing feeling
if you have maintained FM... <-; ).
#1.5
I still like #3 on the top row... simple, and square is nice on certain sites
(ie certain sites require a square logo).
-David
On Jan 19 2017, at 4:3
OK, I focused, and I still prefer 2 with its (very hard to see) paler shadow
Jacques
Le 19/01/2017 à 18:47, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Sincerely I don't see the differences between 1.5 and 2.
Disclaimer: I'm a bit daltonian
Jacques
Le 19/01/2017 à 13:30, Daniel Dekany a écrit :
A new choic
Sincerely I don't see the differences between 1.5 and 2.
Disclaimer: I'm a bit daltonian
Jacques
Le 19/01/2017 à 13:30, Daniel Dekany a écrit :
A new choice! So now in theory I should cancel this vote and start a
new one. But I guess we can be less formal in this case. After all,
changing a l
+1 for 1.5
Am 19.01.2017 6:19 nachm. schrieb "Jacopo Cappellato" <
jacopo.cappell...@gmail.com>:
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 1:30 PM, Daniel Dekany
> wrote:
>
> > A new choice! So now in theory I should cancel this vote and start a
> > new one. But I guess we can be less formal in this case. After
On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 1:30 PM, Daniel Dekany wrote:
> A new choice! So now in theory I should cancel this vote and start a
> new one. But I guess we can be less formal in this case. After all,
> changing a logo is backward compatible (an almost disturbing feeling
> if you have maintained FM...
A new choice! So now in theory I should cancel this vote and start a
new one. But I guess we can be less formal in this case. After all,
changing a logo is backward compatible (an almost disturbing feeling
if you have maintained FM... <-; ).
I change my vote to +1 for #1.5.
Monday, January 16, 2
+1 for #3 as well.
Modern designs are getting more flat and simplistic (which IMO is great). It
seems to be related to people becoming more familiar with standard UI elements
so there really is no need for 3D effects and other fancy things (including
shadows, etc) that usually end up making
I like #3, clean, simple.
On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 6:11 AM, Daniel Dekany wrote:
> We will replace our square logo at Twitter
> (https://twitter.com/freemarker), and probably will use the same logo
> in the future elsewhere too.
>
> Which one do you prefer from the *top* row (1, 2, 3)?
> https://
Hello,
I prefer #1.
But... If I can provide a new one regarding comments
(https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B5BwTaGcWGtNS2VaTDhCcDVLQTQ) I prefer
#1.5 ;)
Regards,
Julien.
On 16/01/2017 12:11, Daniel Dekany wrote:
We will replace our square logo at Twitter
(https://twitter.com/freemarker)
I like #3
On Mon, Jan 16, 2017, 20:50 Jacopo Cappellato
wrote:
> I like the first.
>
> Jacopo
>
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 12:11 PM, Daniel Dekany
> wrote:
>
> > We will replace our square logo at Twitter
> > (https://twitter.com/freemarker), and probably will use the same logo
> > in the future
I like the first.
Jacopo
On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 12:11 PM, Daniel Dekany wrote:
> We will replace our square logo at Twitter
> (https://twitter.com/freemarker), and probably will use the same logo
> in the future elsewhere too.
>
> Which one do you prefer from the *top* row (1, 2, 3)?
> https:/
I vote for [1,2] though I'd prefer a bit less shadow
If I'd like to follow the flat design trend I'd choose [1,3] but I'm not
against skeuomorphism when done right
Jacques
Le 16/01/2017 à 12:11, Daniel Dekany a écrit :
We will replace our square logo at Twitter
(https://twitter.com/freemarke
lthough the 3d effect is overdone.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > -- Denis.
> > Original Message
> > From: Christoph Rüger
> > Sent: Monday, 16 January 2017 11:27
> > To: Freemarker dev Mailinglist; Daniel Dekany
> > Reply To: dev@freemarker.incubator.a
niel Dekany
> Reply To: dev@freemarker.incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Which logo?
>
> +1 for top row #3
>
> I would also like a version of #3 with rounded corners for an app-icon
> look-and-feel.
>
> 2017-01-16 12:11 GMT+01:00 Daniel Dekany :
>
> > We will replace
I vote for #2, although the 3d effect is overdone.
Cheers,
-- Denis.
Original Message
From: Christoph Rüger
Sent: Monday, 16 January 2017 11:27
To: Freemarker dev Mailinglist; Daniel Dekany
Reply To: dev@freemarker.incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Which logo?
+1 for top row #3
I
I vote for the 1st.
Monday, January 16, 2017, 12:11:18 PM, Daniel Dekany wrote:
> We will replace our square logo at Twitter
> (https://twitter.com/freemarker), and probably will use the same logo
> in the future elsewhere too.
>
> Which one do you prefer from the *top* row (1, 2, 3)?
> https://
+1 for top row #3
I would also like a version of #3 with rounded corners for an app-icon
look-and-feel.
2017-01-16 12:11 GMT+01:00 Daniel Dekany :
> We will replace our square logo at Twitter
> (https://twitter.com/freemarker), and probably will use the same logo
> in the future elsewhere too.
>
I like more the third.
Thanks for Julien Nicolas for your contribution!
On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 12:11 PM, Daniel Dekany wrote:
> We will replace our square logo at Twitter
> (https://twitter.com/freemarker), and probably will use the same logo
> in the future elsewhere too.
>
> Which one do you
We will replace our square logo at Twitter
(https://twitter.com/freemarker), and probably will use the same logo
in the future elsewhere too.
Which one do you prefer from the *top* row (1, 2, 3)?
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B5BwTaGcWGtNLU0wQmFiUElFc2c
(The bottom row is for file icons, but
27 matches
Mail list logo
