Sorry I am entering this late in the game but why do we need to decorate the
function at all for metrics. The current implementation has statistics without
decoration. All the concerns raised in this thread concern me as well as the
cost of constructing yet another object every time a function i
Alberto,
Sorry for late responseCurrently geode (java client) does provide
ability to set function timeout; but its through internal system property
"gemfire.CLIENT_FUNCTION_TIMEOUT"Some of the tests using this property
are Tests extending "FunctionRetryTestBase".
Since this is through in
Thanks for following up on this!
-Dan
On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 3:07 AM Alberto Gomez
wrote:
> Thanks for the feedback. I also give a +1 to option a) including Dan's
> comments.
>
> I'll move the RFC to the Development state and will open a ticket to
> follow up on the implementation.
>
> -Albert
No not yet. The documentation tickets got resolved Friday afternoon and
hence the PR will be created today.
Regards
Naba
On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 8:52 AM Dick Cavender wrote:
> Naba-
>
> Do you have this PR ready to merge to release/1.10.0 since we seem to have
> the votes for this to happen?
>
Naba-
Do you have this PR ready to merge to release/1.10.0 since we seem to have
the votes for this to happen?
On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 7:08 AM Jens Deppe wrote:
> +1
>
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 3:08 AM Juan José Ramos wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 11:59 PM Ryan McMahon
> >
+1
On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 3:08 AM Juan José Ramos wrote:
> +1
>
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 11:59 PM Ryan McMahon
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 3:58 PM Donal Evans wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 3:37 PM Benjamin Ross
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1
> > >
+1
On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 11:59 PM Ryan McMahon
wrote:
> +1
>
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 3:58 PM Donal Evans wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 3:37 PM Benjamin Ross wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 3:25 PM Anilkumar Gingade >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1.
Thanks for the feedback. I also give a +1 to option a) including Dan's
comments.
I'll move the RFC to the Development state and will open a ticket to
follow up on the implementation.
-Alberto G.
On 12/9/19 8:15, Jacob Barrett wrote:
> +1
>
> I echo Dan’s comments as well.
>
> Thanks for tackli
Thanks for the answer and the links Anthony, the discussion is interesting.
I think the differences between using CMS and G1 should be documented, I will
to contribute in this topic. For example, we have found these comments in a
GemFire support ticket
(https://community.pivotal.io/s/question/0
