Re: CODEWATCHERS file effects

2021-03-23 Thread Owen Nichols
Hi Alberto, is there a specific PR you feel you were added to in error? I spot-checked #6179 and there was one test change in geode-wan so that one seems correct. I am looking for a solution to avoid adding watchers to draft PRs until they are taken out of draft mode, but it's non-trivial so

Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server interface

2021-03-23 Thread Mike Martell
As the only remaining member on the CSharpDriver team, I too have an attachment to Protobuf. It’s purely technical, however, not emotional. I was truly excited about the prospects of a self-describing protocol and had hopes for a .NET client talking directly to geode without going through the C+

Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server interface

2021-03-23 Thread Udo Kohlmeyer
Alexander, as you know, the intent for this work was to lower the barrier of entry, as the Geode wire protocol is not documented, which makes it impossible to contribute any clients in other languages to the project. The lack of documentation of this feature did also not help the case. If no-on

Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server interface

2021-03-23 Thread Alexander Murmann
Udo, having worked on Protobuf with you, I share the emotional attachment. I also agree that it's a valuable feature to have and that ideally someone would pick it up. I don't think it's feature complete enough at this point to be viable. Unlike with Redis, I haven't seen anyone in the community

Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server interface

2021-03-23 Thread Udo Kohlmeyer
-1 Given that I was on the team that started this initiative, I will naturally have an inclination to say 'No'. I don't know if I would go as far as removing this project/initiative out of Geode. I understand that the way that was used to hook into Geode was less the perfect, and I fully supp

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Geode Committer - Matt Reddington

2021-03-23 Thread Joris Melchior
Welcome Matt! On 2021-03-23, 1:56 PM, "Ernie Burghardt" wrote: The Apache Geode Project Management Committee has invited Matt Reddington to join the Geode as a Committer and we are pleased to announce he has accepted. Please join me in welcoming Mat! Best regards, EB

Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server interface

2021-03-23 Thread Dave Barnes
For the record, docs impact is negligible. Protobuf was never documented in the User Guides, and mentions in the API docs will disappear when those are re-built along with the software. On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 11:55 AM Bruce Schuchardt wrote: > Yes, that's a Go client for Geode. I have already

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Geode Committer - Matt Reddington

2021-03-23 Thread Donal Evans
Congrats Matt! From: Ernie Burghardt Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2021 10:56 AM To: dev@geode.apache.org Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New Geode Committer - Matt Reddington The Apache Geode Project Management Committee has invited Matt Reddington to join the Geode as a Commit

CODEWATCHERS file effects

2021-03-23 Thread Alberto Gomez
Hi, I have recently added myself to the CODEWATCHERS file to be assigned as reviewer to PRs touching certain areas of the code but seems that I am being added to many more PRs that what I intended, even to Draft PRs. Is anybody else experiencing the same? Thanks, Alberto

Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server interface

2021-03-23 Thread Bruce Schuchardt
Yes, that's a Go client for Geode. I have already contacted the author and he's okay with our removing support for it in Geode. On 3/23/21, 11:49 AM, "Mario Salazar de Torres" wrote: Given this is on stall https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fge

Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server interface

2021-03-23 Thread Mario Salazar de Torres
Given this is on stall https://github.com/gemfire/geode-go-client I'd say +1 for removal [https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/194656?s=400&v=4] GitHub - gemfire/geode-go-client What is this? This is the beg

Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server interface

2021-03-23 Thread Alexander Murmann
+1 for removal From: Mark Hanson Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2021 11:44 To: dev@geode.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server interface +1 for removal. On 3/23/21, 8:46 AM, "Darrel Schneider" wrote: I'm in favor of it

Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server interface

2021-03-23 Thread Mark Hanson
+1 for removal. On 3/23/21, 8:46 AM, "Darrel Schneider" wrote: I'm in favor of its removal. I was working on improving the geode thread monitor and found doing that on the protobuf code was much more complicated. From: Bruce Schuchardt Sent: Tu

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Geode Committer - Matt Reddington

2021-03-23 Thread Nabarun Nag
Welcome!! 💯 Regards Naba From: Sarah Abbey Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2021 11:17 AM To: dev@geode.apache.org Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Geode Committer - Matt Reddington Congratulations, Matt!! 🎉 From: Ernie Burghardt Sent: Tuesd

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Geode Committer - Matt Reddington

2021-03-23 Thread Sarah Abbey
Congratulations, Matt!! 🎉 From: Ernie Burghardt Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2021 1:56 PM To: dev@geode.apache.org Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New Geode Committer - Matt Reddington The Apache Geode Project Management Committee has invited Matt Reddington to join the Geode a

[ANNOUNCE] New Geode Committer - Matt Reddington

2021-03-23 Thread Ernie Burghardt
The Apache Geode Project Management Committee has invited Matt Reddington to join the Geode as a Committer and we are pleased to announce he has accepted. Please join me in welcoming Mat! Best regards, EB On behalf of the Apache Geode PMC

Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server interface

2021-03-23 Thread Nabarun Nag
+1 Get Outlook for iOS From: Darrel Schneider Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2021 8:46:24 AM To: dev@geode.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server interface I'm in favor of its removal. I was working on i

Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server interface

2021-03-23 Thread Darrel Schneider
I'm in favor of its removal. I was working on improving the geode thread monitor and found doing that on the protobuf code was much more complicated. From: Bruce Schuchardt Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2021 8:16 AM To: dev@geode.apache.org Subject: [DISCUSS] removal

[DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server interface

2021-03-23 Thread Bruce Schuchardt
Hi folks, We’ve had an experimental client/server interface in Geode that no-one to my knowledge is using. We’re testing it with every build and are having to make changes to it to keep it up to date with the rest of the project. The last change of substance to the geode-protobuf sub-project,