Re: [Proposal] Backport GEODE-9016 to 1.14, 1.13 and 1.12

2021-03-11 Thread Owen Nichols
e Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2021 11:59:17 AM To: dev@geode.apache.org Subject: Re: [Proposal] Backport GEODE-9016 to 1.14, 1.13 and 1.12 +1 to backport. On 3/11/21, 11:38 AM, "Jianxia Chen" wrote: Hi, I would like to backport the fix of GE

Re: [Proposal] Backport GEODE-9016 to 1.14, 1.13 and 1.12

2021-03-11 Thread Nabarun Nag
+1 Get Outlook for iOS<https://aka.ms/o0ukef> From: Anilkumar Gingade Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2021 11:59:17 AM To: dev@geode.apache.org Subject: Re: [Proposal] Backport GEODE-9016 to 1.14, 1.13 and 1.12 +1 to backport. On 3/11/21, 11:38 AM, "J

Re: [Proposal] Backport GEODE-9016 to 1.14, 1.13 and 1.12

2021-03-11 Thread Anilkumar Gingade
+1 to backport. On 3/11/21, 11:38 AM, "Jianxia Chen" wrote: Hi, I would like to backport the fix of GEODE-9016 to Geode 1.14, 1.13 and 1.12 branches. This would help resolve the NPE for certain cases of PutAll with CQ. Thanks, Jianxia

[Proposal] Backport GEODE-9016 to 1.14, 1.13 and 1.12

2021-03-11 Thread Jianxia Chen
Hi, I would like to backport the fix of GEODE-9016 to Geode 1.14, 1.13 and 1.12 branches. This would help resolve the NPE for certain cases of PutAll with CQ. Thanks, Jianxia