Re: [VOTE] Marking Redis Adapter as Experimental

I'm going to go ahead and do this tomorrow if there are no objections. On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 2:39 PM, Dan Smith wrote: > +1 for marking it experimental and going ahead with changing it. > > -Dan > > On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 2:21 PM, Michael Stolz wrote: >

Re: [VOTE] Marking Redis Adapter as Experimental

+1. Good to know. I was just talking to a potential customer this morning that’s intent on replacing voldemort with an IMDG and wanting to merge whatever solution with their current Redis use cases. If its not ready I want to make sure I’m not giving bad information. Wayne Lund Advisory

Re: [VOTE] Marking Redis Adapter as Experimental

+1 for marking it experimental and going ahead with changing it. -Dan On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 2:21 PM, Michael Stolz wrote: > +1 to marking it experimental now > > Once we do that I think it will be fine for the community to make breaking > changes to it if we need to. > > --

Re: [VOTE] Marking Redis Adapter as Experimental

+1 to marking it experimental now Once we do that I think it will be fine for the community to make breaking changes to it if we need to. -- Mike Stolz Principal Engineer, GemFire Product Manager Mobile: +1-631-835-4771 On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 5:08 PM, Galen M O'Sullivan

[VOTE] Marking Redis Adapter as Experimental

Hi all, I think that we should mark the Redis adapter as experimental. This functionality comes from the initial code grant from GemFire. It is mentioned in the "Experimental" section of the GemFire docs [1], and as far as I can tell, the only reason it hasn't been marked as experimental in Geode