[Spring CI] Spring Data GemFire > Nightly-ApacheGeode > #145 was SUCCESSFUL (with 1214 tests)

--- Spring Data GemFire > Nightly-ApacheGeode > #145 was successful. --- Scheduled 1218 tests in total. https://build.spring.io/browse/SGF-NAG-145/ -- This

Build failed in Jenkins: Geode-nightly #298

See Changes: [bschuchardt] GEODE-616: failure detection ports not set in new membership view [bschuchardt] corrections for GMSHealthMonitor from an impromptu code review [bschuchardt] Adding code-coverage testing for GMSMembershipManager

Re: Review Request 40845: GEODE-607: added unit test coverage for SimpleMemoryAllocatorImpl

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/40845/#review108585 --- gemfire-core/src/main/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/internal/offheap/S

Review Request 40846: GEODE-617: Change xsd namespace for lucene to geode.apache.org

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/40846/ --- Review request for geode and Ashvin A. Repository: geode Description ---

Review Request 40845: GEODE-607: added unit test coverage for SimpleMemoryAllocatorImpl

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/40845/ --- Review request for geode and Eric Shu. Bugs: GEODE-607 https://issues.apach

[GitHub] incubator-geode pull request: GEODE-390: removing PartitionManager...

Github user upthewaterspout commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/incubator-geode/pull/37#issuecomment-161128882 +1 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fea

Re: Topic for Dec 17 Geode Clubhouse - what's coming in Apache Geode 1.0 Alpha?

Great, that’s perfect. Edin > On Dec 1, 2015, at 2:24 PM, Gregory Chase wrote: > > Ok - We have Off Heap penciled in for January. > > Are Nitin and Mike feeling good about leading a round table discussion about > likely features for Apache Geode Alpha 1, and feature leads talk about > specif

Re: Topic for Dec 17 Geode Clubhouse - what's coming in Apache Geode 1.0 Alpha?

I’d be happy to talk about the off-heap feature. I just can’t do Dec 17, as I’ll be off starting that day. Would a day before that work? Edin > On Dec 1, 2015, at 2:20 PM, William Markito wrote: > > Hi Greg, > > That would be Edin Zulich, I'm cc'ing him here on this thread. > > On Mon, Nov

Re: Topic for Dec 17 Geode Clubhouse - what's coming in Apache Geode 1.0 Alpha?

Ok - We have Off Heap penciled in for January. Are Nitin and Mike feeling good about leading a round table discussion about likely features for Apache Geode Alpha 1, and feature leads talk about specific changes? -Greg On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 2:20 PM, William Markito wrote: > Hi Greg, > > That

Re: Topic for Dec 17 Geode Clubhouse - what's coming in Apache Geode 1.0 Alpha?

Hi Greg, That would be Edin Zulich, I'm cc'ing him here on this thread. On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 3:14 PM, Gregory Chase wrote: > + William, > > We want to get the topic for the next Geode Clubhouse user education > locked down for the 12/17 9AM Pacific time. > > We had discussed an overview of w

Re: Review of 1.0.0-alpha1 issues

@Anthony - I think your git flow statement was meant to be 'git flow feature track GEODE-608' for helping with RAT integration. I will take a look at the branch. As for the release numbering/naming discussion...I agree with 1.0.0-alpha1 for the upcoming release. --Mark On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 11:

Want to see how the Apache Geode community is doing? Check out our dashboard!

Greetings Apache Geode community, I'm proud to unveil our publicly available dashboard for the Apache Geode community based on Bitergia: http://projects.bitergia.com/apache-geode/browser/ Check this link anytime you like to see about the health and engagement of our growing community. -- Greg C

Re: Review of 1.0.0-alpha1 issues

I just resolved GEODE-611. I did some initial work on GEODE-608 and it’s available on a feature branch [1]. Next step is to whittle down the excludes list and fix the failures in conjunction with GEODE-18. If someone wants to jump in on this work that would be great. Thanks to Niall and Niti

Re: Review of 1.0.0-alpha1 issues

Great discussion! So we're certainly cutting an initial (alpha1) release. Depending on its completeness/ quality, we can decide another alpha/ beta/ RC/ etc. @Anil: though I also prefer dot releases, Geode is somewhat different in that it is a mature codebase out of the gate. So maybe it should

Re: Geode 1.0.0 (alpha1): Open questions

Thanks for the responses! (1) and (2) are answered/ closed. For (3), you're right - doesn't matter too much for a Java project though the parallel (documentation) thread has captured relevant discussion. So in conclusion, we can: - List the JDK(s) and all the platforms that the code has been te

Re: installation documentation: which details do we need to specify?

That sounds like a good plan. We can also just add some language saying that these are platforms that are known to build, but that other platforms might also work given a compatible JDK. -David On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 3:44 PM, William Markito wrote: > Hi Karen, > > Indeed just Java, but about

Re: Review Request 40722: GEODE-606: Add some logging to war file detection

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/40722/#review108542 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Barry Oglesby On Dec. 1, 2015, 5:42 p.m., J

Re: Review Request 40722: GEODE-606: Add some logging to war file detection

- Jens --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/40722/#review108538 --- On Dec. 1, 2015, 5:42 p.m., Jens Deppe wrote: > > --

Re: Review Request 40722: GEODE-606: Add some logging to war file detection

> On Dec. 1, 2015, 5:16 p.m., Barry Oglesby wrote: > > Do you want to log where the war files are expected to be (where you looked > > for them) in the warning? Good idea. Thanks! - Jens --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. T

Re: Review Request 40722: GEODE-606: Add some logging to war file detection

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/40722/ --- (Updated Dec. 1, 2015, 5:42 p.m.) Review request for geode and Wes Williams.

Re: xml schema locations

Thanks Niall! I've Just updated GEODE-386. On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 9:08 AM, Michael Stolz wrote: > If it is possible to go directly to http://geode.apache.org we should > probably do that. > > -- > Mike Stolz > Principal Engineer - Gemfire Product Manager > Mobile: 631-835-4771 > On Dec 1, 2015 7

Re: Review Request 40722: GEODE-606: Add some logging to war file detection

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/40722/#review108538 --- Ship it! Do you want to log where the war files are expected to be

Re: xml schema locations

If it is possible to go directly to http://geode.apache.org we should probably do that. -- Mike Stolz Principal Engineer - Gemfire Product Manager Mobile: 631-835-4771 On Dec 1, 2015 7:54 AM, "Niall Pemberton" wrote: > On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 7:41 PM, William Markito > wrote: > > > I'm concerned

Re: Review Request 40784: GEODE-611: Change findbugs annotations to use ASL library

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/40784/#review108531 --- Ship it! If it build. And findbug ignored these attributes; looks

Re: Review Request 40784: GEODE-611: Change findbugs annotations to use ASL library

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/40784/ --- (Updated Dec. 1, 2015, 4:53 p.m.) Review request for geode, Mark Bretl and Dan

Re: xml schema locations

On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 7:41 PM, William Markito wrote: > I'm concerned that we will need another update on applications and other > usages and after TLP, since we'll drop the .incubator of the url. > > But I don't have a better alternative yet to propose. > Just seen this email[1] on general@inc

Fwd: Review Request 40722: GEODE-606: Add some logging to war file detection

Could someone take a quick look at this review please? Thanks --Jens -- Forwarded message -- From: Jens Deppe Date: Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 2:55 PM Subject: Review Request 40722: GEODE-606: Add some logging to war file detection To: Wes Williams Cc: geode , Jens Deppe This is an

Jenkins build is back to normal : Geode-nightly #297

See