Re: Open source the integrated development framework for geode/gemfire!

That sounds really interesting. Please share more info or some code so we can take a look. Sent from my iPhone > On Nov 11, 2016, at 12:33 PM, Michael Stolz wrote: > > I am too! > > -- > Mike Stolz > Principal Engineer - Gemfire Product Manager > Mobile: 631-835-4771 >> On Nov 11, 2016 11:3

Re: jmh benchmarks

+1 Sent from my iPhone > On Nov 2, 2016, at 11:35 AM, Udo Kohlmeyer wrote: > > +2 > > >> On 3/11/16 5:17 am, Dan Smith wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I'd like to add some support for running benchmarks with jmh to geode. Is >> this something we're interested in having? JMH is a framework for easily

Re: Review Request 53395: Adding a geode-benchmark project with support for running jmh benchmarks

with instructions on how to get the results (for people not familiar with JMH) and integration of the results with Jenkins/CI so we have historical data. Ship-it! - William Markito On Nov. 2, 2016, 6:11 p.m., Dan Smith wrote

Re: Backwards compatibility for 1.1

+1 On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 10:30 AM, Swapnil Bawaskar wrote: > +1 for maintaining backwards compatibility. > > On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 9:40 AM, Mark Bretl wrote: > > > +1 for backward compatibility with Geode releases. > > > > --Mark > > > > On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 8:11 AM, Kenneth Howe wrote: >

Re: Docker image for Geode 1.0.0-incubating - Please evaluate

Done. apachegeode/geode:latest On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 12:42 PM, William Markito Oliveira < william.mark...@gmail.com> wrote: > Sounds cool. That's a great ideia! > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On Oct 31, 2016, at 12:41 PM, Anthony Baker wrote: > > > >

Re: Docker image for Geode 1.0.0-incubating - Please evaluate

Sounds cool. That's a great ideia! Sent from my iPhone > On Oct 31, 2016, at 12:41 PM, Anthony Baker wrote: > > Nice! What about tagging it with 'latest'? > > Anthony > >> On Oct 31, 2016, at 12:13 PM, William Markito Oliveira >> wrote: &

Docker image for Geode 1.0.0-incubating - Please evaluate

I've just updated our Docker image with 1.0.0-incubating bits, please evaluate. There is also a pull request for review updating our Dockerfile to use 1.0.0-incubating and OpenJDK instead of Oracle. - https://hub.docker.com/r/apachegeode/geode/tags/ - https://github.com/apache/incubator-geode/pul

Re: Improving release notes

Really like those as well! +1 Sent from my iPhone > On Oct 27, 2016, at 3:10 PM, Anthony Baker wrote: > > The release notes [1] from the latest release announcement [2] included a > long list of all the JIRA’s associated with the release. Having a curated > list that highlights the most inte

Re: Review Request 53243: GEODE-2044 Add to docs tc Server 3.2 for HTTP Session Mgmt module

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/53243/#review154191 --- Ship it! Ship It! - William Markito On Oct. 27, 2016, 10:38

Re: Review Request 53214: GEODE-2040 Add to docs Tomcat 8.0 and 8.5 for HTTP Session Mgmt module

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/53214/#review153983 --- Ship it! Ship It! - William Markito On Oct. 26, 2016, 11:44

Re: GEODE-2036 and documentation practices and procedures

1. +1 2. +1 - Reason and common sense should apply... 3. +1 On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 6:03 PM, Joey McAllister wrote: > Thanks for kicking this off, Karen! > > 1. +1 - I like the idea of making documentation part of the requirements > for issues that need it. Is it better in these cases to use th

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduation

++1 Also totally agree with the proposed scheme of rotation for PPMCs On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 5:25 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > Hi! > > with the 1.0.0-incubating release officially out (huge kudos > to the team!) I think it is time we officially start our graduation > discussion. Process-wise

GEODE-25 and Cryptography Audit

I was checking GEODE-25 and found that there is already an attached PDF with information around export compliance, etc... https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-25 Is there anything else actually pending to resolve GEODE-25 ? Some discussions happened on the ticket but I'm not sure if they'

Re: Coding practices/standards

;>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -"SELECT ID, description, createTime, pkid > FROM > > >>>>>>>>>>> /portfolio1 > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> pf1 > > >>>

Re: Updating Swagger

Looks really good! +1 On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 12:33 PM, Dan Smith wrote: > Looks great to me! > > Original message > From: Kevin Duling > Date: 10/20/16 12:22 PM (GMT-08:00) > To: dev@geode.incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: Updating Swagger > > I've updated the page to app

Re: Hosting the docs (was Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating - RC2)

at 5:21 PM, Dan Smith > wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> Along these lines, should we distributing the docs with the binary > > >>> release? > > >>>> Or maybe just providing a link to them? The README.md shipped with > > >>>

Re: Hosting the docs (was Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating - RC2)

; wrote: > > > @Roman: Nothing that I can think of, apart from giving the community time > > to offer feedback here (which, it looks like, is all positive). William > > Markito and I were able to build and test a local version of the website > > with the docs included. > &g

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating - RC2

+1 Checked SHA, signatures, build/run, sample app and command line testing through gfsh. On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 10:33 AM, Kirk Lund wrote: > +1 I think we should target GEODE-2004 and GEODE-1883 for a point release > after 1.0.0 > > > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 9:46 AM, Jinmei Liao wrote: > > >

Re: Hosting the docs (was Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating - RC2)

+1 On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Swapnil Bawaskar wrote: > +1, It would be great to have this by the time we put the vote out on > general@incubator > > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 10:59 AM, Joey McAllister > wrote: > > > Only a very enthusiastic +1. :) > > > > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 10:57 AM

Re: Coding practices/standards

This sounds really good to me as well. +1 On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 4:13 PM, Jared Stewart wrote: > This is running locally on my laptop. Since Spotless is only doing code > formatting and not any other static analysis, it already has 0 errors. > (Other than, of course, formatting not consistent

Re: Deprecate DynamicRegionFactory

+1 - We always discouraged people using dynamic regions On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 4:33 PM, Dan Smith wrote: > I'd like to reopen the discussion about deprecating > DynamicRegionFactory. This is some old crufty code I don't think we > want anyone to use. I see we had a ticket to deprecated it > (G

Re: Using Fix Version on JIRA

essage/lmxtps7clvyphpg2 > > On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 10:02 PM, William Markito > wrote: > > > This may sound like a simple and not really important, but it's key to > > track issues and which release the fix is part of. > > > > It also helps in generatin

Using Fix Version on JIRA

This may sound like a simple and not really important, but it's key to track issues and which release the fix is part of. It also helps in generating automated release notes through JIRA, such as this one [1] from M3. Since we already created a release branch for 1.0 but there is work still on-go

Re: From Incubation to TLP

Really glad to read this... ;) Sent from my iPhone > On Sep 30, 2016, at 8:27 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 12:22 AM, Niall Pemberton > wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 3:33 AM, Anthony Baker wrote: >> >>> Hi Niall! >>> >>> Thanks for your really helpful input. I

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Donation of Geode documentation

This is a huge accomplishment for the project. Many TLP projects still doesn't have their documents contributed to ASF yet... so congratulations to Geode and everybody involved! On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 10:48 AM, Greg Chase wrote: > On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 10:28 AM, Karen Miller wrote: > > > I'

Re: Previous versions dtds

++1 for dropping the DTD's All of them. :) On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 2:41 PM, Dan Smith wrote: > +1 for dropping the dtd up to 6.6. -1 for dropping 7.0/8.0, 8.1 xsd. I > think we should keep those for another release or two to make it easier for > people upgrading. > > Is anyone actually usin

Re: Limiting scope for Geode 1.0

+1 On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 9:16 AM, Kenneth Howe wrote: > +1 > > > On Sep 29, 2016, at 2:31 PM, Jacob Barrett wrote: > > > > +1 for creating branch now to prevent feature creep. > > > > On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 2:10 PM Kirk Lund wrote: > > > >> I think we should propose creating that release br

Re: Review Request 52366: GEODE-1675: Update the tomcat 8 context-fragment files for tcserver to use the new Tomcat8 manager

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/52366/#review150785 --- Ship it! Ship It! - William Markito On Sept. 28, 2016, 9:34

Re: Review Request 52267: GEODE-1937: Making precheckin depend on running examples

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/52267/#review150469 --- Ship it! Ship It! - William Markito On Sept. 26, 2016, 9:29

Re: Hibernate module and Geode 1.0 ?

>> On Sep 22, 2016, at 3:31 PM, Udo Kohlmeyer wrote: >>> >>> +1 to removing until updated to newer version >>> >>> Do we know if anyone in the big-bad world is using it? >>> >>> --Udo >>> >>> >>> On 23/09/2016 8:15

Hibernate module and Geode 1.0 ?

Folks, We're still building the Hibernate cache module [1] but it's compatible only with a very old version (3.5) and given that the API has completely changed and unless someone in the community wants to help getting this module up-to-date with at least Hibernate 5.x I'd like propose to remove th

Updated website and changes to cache-1.0.xsd after package rename

Thanks to Joey for the contribution, the community events page is now up-to-date. While doing this update I noticed that the cache.xsd [2] file got some minimal updates after package rename and those are also published as well. [1] http://geode.incubator.apache.org/community/ [2] http://geode.inc

M3 is out - New release manager for 1.0 ?

With M3 out and all the discussions we're having around what's needed for 1.0, I think we should continue the rotation of release managers and get a new volunteer for 1.0. As part of this conversation we should also discuss the scope and roadmap for 1.0 and could use the thread [1] for M3 as a sta

Re: Docker image updated on DockerHub

Oracle Java binaries in docker images. Thoughts ? [1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-geode/tree/develop/dev-tools/docker On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 1:02 PM, William Markito wrote: > That's right Jens! I still need to push the updates to that docker image > file... Will create a JIRA

Re: Docker image updated on DockerHub

> That is because ENTRYPOINT is specified as 'gfsh' by the image. Images > built from the repo Dockerfile simply have CMD specified as 'gfsh' which is > overridable by appending 'bash' to the 'docker run' command. > > How was the 'M3' imag

Re: Docker image updated on DockerHub

M3 > > ...for a bash prompt. > > --Jens > >> On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 9:58 PM, William Markito wrote: >> >> Just updated our Docker image on DockerHub [1] with M3. >> >> docker run -it apachegeode/geode:1.0.0-incubating.M3 >> >> The comma

Docker image updated on DockerHub

Just updated our Docker image on DockerHub [1] with M3. docker run -it apachegeode/geode:1.0.0-incubating.M3 The command above will give you `gfsh` now for default. Append "bash" to the end if you'd like access to the prompt. [1] https://hub.docker.com/r/apachegeode/geode/tags/ Cheers, -- ~/

Re: M3 is done, what's next?

++1 to finally do it! This is great! We should include not only Spring Data Geode but also Apache Zeppelin, Apache Apex... On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 8:46 AM, Anthony Baker wrote: > Hi everyone, > > We completed the M3 release in August and now we should consider the scope > for the next release:

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: Geode-nightly #577

Looks like our build was running on H5 machine which seems to be the same faulty one that caused Geode-release to fail many times... I've added that machine to the exclusion list and kicked another build, let's see how that goes. Thanks On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 8:06 AM, Apache Jenkins Server < je

Finishing Geode M3 and my vacation

Hey folks, I'll be on vacation next week and as it currently stand, I'm with the impression that we should have M3 ready to be released by then (voting is still on-going in general@incubator.a.o) so I'd like to ask for a volunteer to finish the work and announce the release. The steps are all doc

Re: Publishing of geode javadocs

+1 for that as well. Sent from my iPhone > On Aug 12, 2016, at 5:15 PM, Kirk Lund wrote: > > +1 I'd love to have this in place. What do others think? > > > On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 5:13 PM, Roman Shaposhnik > wrote: > >>> On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 4:51 PM, Dan Smith wrote: >>> I'm not sure

Re: Experimental features for 1.0

I've just updated it, can you please try again ? Thanks On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 11:30 AM, John Blum wrote: > Hi William- > > Says your filter does not exist or is private, even when logged in. > > Thanks, > -John > > > On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 11:22 AM, William

Re: Experimental features for 1.0

he list. Thanks! On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 9:40 AM, William Markito wrote: > Cool! I'll take a stab looking current stuff in develop and already opened > tickets. > > On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 9:39 AM, Anthony Baker wrote: > >> I think that is the relevant point. We are

Re: Experimental features for 1.0

Cool! I'll take a stab looking current stuff in develop and already opened tickets. On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 9:39 AM, Anthony Baker wrote: > I think that is the relevant point. We are making releases from develop, > not from WIP branches. > > @John, HDFS was moved to a WIP branch. > > Anthony >

Experimental features for 1.0

As we move forward to 1.0 I'd like to propose creating JIRAS with the "experimental" label to capture everything we have that is classified as such. This would help users and projects consume Geode to consider those features properly and decide to add support (or not) to them as well. AFAIK t

Re: Geode M3 docs: Review opportunity

LGTM. +1 Thanks Dave! On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 11:40 AM, Dave Barnes wrote: > I've posted the Geode User docs for the upcoming M3 release here: > > http://geode-review.cfapps.io/ > > Please have a look at the section(s) describing the features you've > implemented and send me any suggestions or

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating.M3 - RC7

DE-1493 > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-geode/search?q=% > > 22239.192.81.1%22&type=Code > > > > > > -Dan > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 5:20 PM, Brian Dunlap > > wrote: > > > > > >> In M3 RC7, the c

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating.M3 - RC7

> >> * Successful precheckin run of this release - > >> https://builds.apache.org/job/ > >> Geode-release/24/ <https://builds.apache.org/job/Geode-release/24/> > >> * Signatures > >> * Basic gfsh commands with binary dist > >> * Built from s

[VOTE] Release Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating.M3 - RC7

All, This is the seventh release candidate Apache Geode, version 1.0.0-incubating.M3. We're including the feedback received in RC6 including a fix (83f97ceef52febf92ef7737726548aa0865c1a59) to run REST API tests. Thanks to all the community members to drive towards this milestone! It fixes the

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: Geode-release #22

Added H0 to the exclusion list... Seems to be the machine that has some other problems. On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 9:25 AM, Apache Jenkins Server < jenk...@builds.apache.org> wrote: > See > > -- > Started by use

Re: Flaky tests failing with BindException

Why not create a JUnit rule that returns available ports and keep track of ports being used ? I've cloned this gist from somewhere (don't remember now) but I've planning to send it for discussion... https://gist.github.com/markito/b5be3fc570c7c7c84e6d09e064a6e898 Still talking about rules, I've

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating.M3 - RC6

>> +++ b/geode-assembly/build.gradle > >> @@ -387,6 +387,7 @@ def dependOnInstalledProduct = { > >> test dependOnInstalledProduct > >> distributedTest dependOnInstalledProduct > >> integrationTest dependOnInstalledProduct > >> +flakyTest dependOnInst

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating.M3 - RC6

itTest > > testFunctionExecutionOnAllMembers FAILED > java.lang.AssertionError: unable to locate geode-web-api WAR file > > java.lang.NullPointerException > > > > On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 12:28 PM, William Markito > wrote: > > > All, > > > > T

Re: Review Request 50522: GEODE-64: Add SonarQube Plugin And Initial Configuration

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/50522/#review143797 --- Ship it! Ship It! - William Markito On July 27, 2016, 6:10

[VOTE] Release Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating.M3 - RC6

All, This is the sixth release candidate Apache Geode, version 1.0.0-incubating.M3. We're including the feedback received in RC5 fixing a classpath issue on 'gfsh' caused by wrong build arguments. Thanks to all the community members to drive towards this milestone! It fixes the following issues

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating.M3 - RC5

class > com.gemstone.gemfire.management.internal.cli.Launcher > > -Dan > > On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 12:16 PM, William Markito > wrote: > > > All, > > > > This is the fourth release candidate Apache Geode, version > > 1.0.0-incubating.M3. > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating.M3 - RC5

gt; > Ken > > > On Jul 26, 2016, at 12:16 PM, William Markito > wrote: > > > > All, > > > > This is the fourth release candidate Apache Geode, version > > 1.0.0-incubating.M3. > > > > We're including the feedback received in RC3 an

[VOTE] Release Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating.M3 - RC5

All, This is the fourth release candidate Apache Geode, version 1.0.0-incubating.M3. We're including the feedback received in RC3 and fixing intermittent test failure. See GEODE-1594 for more details. Thanks to all the community members to drive towards this milestone! It fixes the following is

Re: Review Request 50419: GEODE-1617: Metadata region was not having a cache listener attached

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/50419/#review143437 --- Ship it! Ship It! - William Markito On July 25, 2016, 9:38

Update on Apache Geode M3 release

Folks, I was waiting for the stabilization of release branch and considering options after looking at the errors, but as it currently stand, given that we're having successful builds on develop, I'll be restarting the release process branching off develop once again for M3 and RC4 should be out at

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: Geode-nightly #537

Swapnil and I looked at the Jenkins failures of Geode release branch [1] and all of them were running on the same box as Geode-nightly [2] build from yesterday... "Building remotely on H0 (*Hadoop Tez yahoo-not-h2*)" We're still not sure what configuration

Geode-nightly still has gemfire-pulse step

Here is the current configuration on geode-nightly: git clean -d -f gemfire-pulse/src/main/resources/ Shouldn't this be : git clean -d -f geode-pulse/src/main/resources/ Thanks -- ~/William

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating.M3 - RC3

s earlier. It looks like there is a test that is consistently > failing on the release branch. > .ConsoleDistributionManagerDUnitTest > testApplications > https://builds.apache.org/job/Geode-release/12/ > > ---- Original message > From: William Markito > Dat

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating.M3 - RC3

> I noticed the new examples are not shipped with the binary distribution. We > should probably include the examples in the binary distribution as well. > > -Dan > > On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 3:07 PM, William Markito > wrote: > > > All, > > > > This is

[VOTE] Release Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating.M3 - RC3

All, This is the third release candidate Apache Geode, version 1.0.0-incubating.M3. We're including the feedback received in RC2: - GEODE-1668: Revert change to not exclude gradle-wrapper.properties Thanks to all the community members to drive towards this milestone! It fixes the following iss

[VOTE] Release Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating.M3 - RC2

All, This is the second release candidate Apache Geode, version 1.0.0-incubating.M3. We're including the feedback received in RC1: - GEODE-1665: Remove bundled jar from source distribution - GEODE-1664: Remove jopt-simple from src LICENSE - Add AOP Alliance to LICENSE

[VOTE] Release Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating.M3

All, This is the first release candidate Apache Geode, version 1.0.0-incubating.M3. Thanks to all the community members to drive towards this milestone! It fixes the following issues: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12318420&version=12335358 *** Please download,

Re: [DISCUSS] M3 Release branch created

wise > it’s pretty confusing about how to mark the ‘Fix version’ for bug. > > Anthony > > > On Jul 8, 2016, at 1:01 PM, William Markito wrote: > > > > The release branch for M3 is release/1.0.0-incubating.M3. Check it out > and > > see if there are any issues

[DISCUSS] M3 Release branch created

The release branch for M3 is release/1.0.0-incubating.M3. Check it out and see if there are any issues we should fix before creating the release. I will create a release candidate on Tuesday and start a vote if there are no outstanding issues with the release branch. Link: https://github.com/apac

Re: M3 status?

. Could you > please wait till tomorrow to cut the branch? Thanks! > > On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 6:18 PM, William Markito > wrote: > > > Given the recent changes on develop (*jopt-simple*) I'm planning to cut > the > > M3 release branch late next week (Wednesday/Thur

Re: M3 status?

un 27, 2016 at 11:14 AM, Swapnil Bawaskar > wrote: > > I have filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-1598 which may > > have been caused by fixing GEODE-835. > > > > In my opinion GEODE-1598 should be fixed before we release M3. > > > > On Tue, Jun 21, 2

Re: Geode website tagged with minor Apache branding issue in audit

, Jul 1, 2016 at 5:49 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote: > On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 7:12 PM, Greg Chase wrote: > > > On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 10:41 AM, William Markito > > wrote: > > > > > We had a similar feedback from Niall during the first rollout of the > > > w

Re: Geode website tagged with minor Apache branding issue in audit

We had a similar feedback from Niall during the first rollout of the website and then we increased the font-size of the disclaimer and the size of the incubator logo. I'd agree with Dave and we should definitely improve but with a more proper specifics to nail it. On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 9:22 AM,

Re: Valid characters in region names?

We already discussed this on the previous thread and got general consensus on getting "ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz12345678 90_-" for Geode... Anything other than this can be problematic for JMX and other components that will then require special treatment to handle unusual

Re: Podling Report Reminder - July 2016

+1. LGTM Sent from my iPhone > On Jun 28, 2016, at 4:48 PM, Nabarun Nag wrote: > > Hi > > Please find below the draft of the podling report. > > Any feedback is welcome. > > Regards > Naba > > > > Geode > > Geode is a data management platform that provides real-time,

Re: Apache Geode incubation

Thanks a lot Niall and Roman for your thoughtful comments! It's really great to read all this and see where we are as a project!! On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 11:12 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 7:39 PM, Niall Pemberton > wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 3:13 PM, Greg Ch

Re: M3 status?

Just pushed GEODE-33 [1] for review. [1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-geode/tree/feature/GEODE-33 On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 6:05 PM, Kirk Lund wrote: > Yep, huge thanks to Grace Meilen for finishing up GEODE-835! > > -Kirk > > On Friday, June 17, 2016, Swapnil Bawaskar wrote: > > > GEODE-

Re: Support for Apache Geode in Apache Zest

This is very interesting Greg! We should think of a section on the wiki or website to start collecting those integrations, such as Zeppelin, Ambari and now Zest. On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 11:15 PM, Greg Chase wrote: > Dear Geode contributors, > I just got some detail about support for Apache Geod

Re: New committer and PPMC Member: Nabarun Nag

Welcome Naba! On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 4:21 PM, Sai Boorlagadda wrote: > Congrats & Welcome Naba! > > On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 7:41 PM, Nitin Lamba wrote: > > > Congrats and welcome! > > > > On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 3:33 PM, Jason Huynh wrote: > > > > > Congrats! > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 14, 2016

Re: Proposal to allow eviction and expiration operations/events with AsyncEventQueue.

+1 On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 3:32 PM, Dan Smith wrote: > +1 for splitting it up and getting rid of the Eviction option for now. > > I think I was the one who suggested setIgnoreExpiration originally. > Ignore/Forward, I guess it's not really a big deal. But since you are > setting a property on the

Re: Framework for testing example shell scripts

ust do this within junit tests - where maybe you want to make other > assertions about the state of the system anyway? > > -Dan > > On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 2:23 PM, William Markito > wrote: > > > Guys, > > > > What do you think about using something like Bats

Framework for testing example shell scripts

Guys, What do you think about using something like Bats [1] to test shell scripts that will be available as part of the examples ? Not sure if we would have any conflicts or problems with their license [2] but it doesn't seem the case... Thanks [1] https://github.com/sstephenson/bats [2] https:

Re: Kafka Ingester

Hey Ross This sounds like a great idea and I'd recommend it to be yet another separate module, like the Spark connector for example. Kafka and Geode share many similar concepts but support different data structures so there could be many different use cases for such connector. Looking forwar

Re: DistributionConfig and Geode system properties

++1 - This is really good! On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 12:16 PM, Udo Kohlmeyer wrote: > John: Perhaps the (interface) name can be simplified to > ConfigurationProperties too. > > Funnily enough I initially had called it SystemConfigurationProperties, > but later renamed it because it felt too gener

Geode M3 Release - Status

We are down to only 3 items [1] and made very good progress. Hopefully we should be able to wrap up by end of this week and start release procedures next week. [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/RapidBoard.jspa?rapidView=92&view=planning&selectedIssue=GEODE-1293&versions=visible&select

Re: Geode Portfile for Mac Ports

+1 Cool stuff! With brew and ports now we should probably add those to the wiki as alternatives to install Geode. Next steps could be rpm or deb packages. ;) Sent from my iPhone > On May 17, 2016, at 7:36 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > > Awesome work, but please consider calling it apache

Updated M3 release page

Just updated M3 release page and JIRA issues. [1] Updated 1.0.0 items as per our previous discussion [2] as well and created a release page [3] as a placeholder and to provide an idea of the upcoming items. Let the sprint being... ;) [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/1.0.0-in

Re: JIRA labels for newbies

Or better yet - project = GEODE and status in (Open) and labels in (starter, gsoc2016, low-hanging-fruit, newbie, easyfix) - Total of 15 items... On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 3:03 PM, William Markito wrote: > You may find a couple of more interesting items on this query - project = > GEO

Re: JIRA labels for newbies

You may find a couple of more interesting items on this query - project = GEODE and status in (Open) and labels in (starter, gsoc2016, low-hanging-fruit) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-1113?jql=project%20%3D%20GEODE%20and%20status%20in%20(Open)%20and%20labels%20in%20(starter%2C%20gso

Re: What will it take to release geode 1.0?

t process is concluded. > > Thanks, > Brian - > > Thanks for feedback! > > On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 7:07 PM, William Markito > wrote: > > > @Anthony, what if we did: > > > > # M3 > > GEODE-1028 Broken website link > > GEODE-1133

Re: What will it take to release geode 1.0?

current version is not on > Maven central > > GEODE-1028Broken website link > > GEODE-1191 HDFS references > > GEODE-1133 SeparateClassloaderTestRunner > > GEODE-1260 Source distribution version info > > > > Anthony > > > > > >> On May

Re: What will it take to release geode 1.0?

Guys, restarting this thread to get a discussion going about M3, 1.0.0 and next - As the release manager for M3 here is what I'd like to propose. Any feedback is welcome and let's also reuse this thread to talk a little bit about roadmap as well ? # Current M3 Scope ( https://cwiki.apache.org/co

Re: Release manager volunteer for the next release?

Hi Dan, I can give it a shot for M3. I'll sent another message to discuss M3 and scope. On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 11:08 AM, Dan Smith wrote: > With M2 done, it's time to talk about that next release of geode. > > Are there any volunteers to be the release manager for the next release? I > can d

Re: Upgrading Gradle to version 2.12

+1 On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 10:41 AM, Jason Huynh wrote: > Hello Geode dev list, > > As a heads up, I am about to check in a change to upgrade the Gradle > version to 2.12. This will address GEODE-1259, GEODE-1085, GEODE-1261. > > This change will now make the required minimum Gradle Version the

Re: Next steps with flickering tests

+1 Are we also planning to automate the additional build task somehow ? I'd also suggest creating a wiki page with some stats (like how many FlakyTests we currently have) and the idea behind this effort so we can keep track and see how it's evolving over time. On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 6:54 PM, Ki

Re: [DISCUSS] Geode Examples (GEODE-33)

Hey Udo, That's right, when native client lands in Geode as well. Thanks On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 12:06 PM, Udo Kohlmeyer wrote: > Hey William, > > I'm assuming that these examples would both be in Java and Native Client > (where applicable)? > > --Udo > &

Re: [DISCUSS] Geode Examples (GEODE-33)

mic region creation > > ~ Nikhil > > On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 7:13 AM, kareem shabazz > wrote: > > > Looks good for the noobs (like myself) - can contribute and explore > > different parts of Geode's expansive landscape. > > On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 1:15

[DISCUSS] Geode Examples (GEODE-33)

Hey folks, Here is a proposal for the initial README.md file and structure for Geode examples subproject. Ideally each item on the list would become a project on its own, very similar to what Spring Data GemFire and I've also added a few items from the old GemFire examples. This would also be a

Review Request 46474: GEODE-33 - Initial structure for geode-examples with list of examples

settings.gradle c579dce Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/46474/diff/ Testing --- Build with latest snapshot Build with specific geode version from command line (gradle build -PgeodeVersion=X.Y.Z) Thanks, William Markito

Geode-release - Jenkins job

There is now a new job monitoring (hourly) the Geode release branches that should be triggered whenever there is a new change. The build will just run "clean precheckin" - No uploads. Link - https://builds.apache.org/job/Geode-release/ Please let us know if there is any concern or suggestions

  1   2   3   4   >