On Thursday, July 15, 2004, at 04:50 PM, Gianny Damour wrote:
On 16/07/2004 7:54 AM, David Jencks wrote:
Can you check that your openejb copy is up to date? I've been trying
to fix these case problems in both projects while doing actual
development work and I think but am not entirely sure that a
Hi Brendan,
Would have loved to use your work and ideas to finish this feature(and I hope
you are fully recovered by now). Since you already have made some progress it
would have been a good place to start.David Jencks has indicated that the EJB
2.1 Timer support will be done in a day or two. I
On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 02:54:27PM -0700, David Jencks wrote:
> Can you check that your openejb copy is up to date?
I did a CVS pull and a "maven clean && maven", is there anything more
I need to do?
> I've been trying
> to fix these case problems in both projects while doing actual
> develop
The following comment has been added to this issue:
Author: toby cabot
Created: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 6:38 AM
Body:
I'll attach a patch to Daemon.java that changes the println's to use logging.
I think that this addresses your issue (don't log unless you're sure it's
really a problem
The following issue has been updated:
Updater: toby cabot (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 6:40 AM
Changes:
Attachment changed to daemon-log.diff
-
For a full history of the issue,
The following comment has been added to this issue:
Author: toby cabot
Created: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 6:44 AM
Body:
just noticed that my patch has a typo in one of the log messages: "staring
kernel shutdown" should be "starting kernel shutdown". if only log4j had a
grammar checker...
The following issue has been updated:
Updater: toby cabot (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 6:47 AM
Changes:
Attachment changed to daemon-log.diff
-
For a full history of the issue,
There seems to be a mismatch between the jars that maven picks up. This
always happens whenever some major refactoring occurs. The way to get
around this is to refresh both Geronimo and OpenEJB and build them both
by hand. Build OpenEJB first, then Geronimo second. This seems to work
for me.
Message:
The following issue has been re-assigned.
Assignee: Dain Sundstrom (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
Assigner: Jeremy Boynes (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 10:39 AM
Comment:
Toby, thanks
The reason this class was using System.err was because it was runnin
On Wed, 14 Jul 2004, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
|
| On Jul 13, 2004, at 5:39 PM, toby cabot wrote:
|
| > On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 03:33:35PM -0400, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
| >> Is it really "now" as in "if you don't have to wait for a thread, do
| >> it
| >> - otherwise return w/ a status indicating
The following comment has been added to this issue:
Author: toby cabot
Created: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 11:16 AM
Body:
Thanks Jeremy, I think that using the logger in this class should be OK since
this class initializes it in a static block.
-
Gianny,
On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 08:33:25PM +1000, Gianny Damour wrote:
> So, to sum it up, in a first pass one applies the JMX standards; and in
> case of failure, a case insensitive match of method and attribute names
> is performed.
Does this algorithm need to be coded in
o.a.g.gbean.DynamicG
On Wed, 14 Jul 2004, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
|
| On Jul 13, 2004, at 5:39 PM, toby cabot wrote:
|
| > On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 03:33:35PM -0400, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
| >> Is it really "now" as in "if you don't have to wait for a thread, do
| >> it
| >> - otherwise return w/ a status indicatin
On Jul 16, 2004, at 12:11 PM, toby cabot wrote:
Gianny,
On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 08:33:25PM +1000, Gianny Damour wrote:
So, to sum it up, in a first pass one applies the JMX standards; and
in
case of failure, a case insensitive match of method and attribute
names
is performed.
Does this algorithm
On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 01:44:38PM -0700, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
> I think is should be consistent with the other two, but this needs
> to be cleared with David Jencks first, as the connector code is the
> biggest (only) user of dynamic gbeans.
OK, here's a patch. It puts each attribute in the map
Something that would be extremely useful for (I think) all developers
and would expose you to large amounts of how geronimo works would be a
well designed integration test framework. What I'm thinking of would
generate a Configuration from an xml plan, start a geronimo server, and
load the con
Glad to contribute where its most required. I am interested.
Thanks,
Dev
-Original Message-
From: David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Jul 16, 2004 2:21 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Anyone working on EJB 2.1 Timer support
Something that would be extremely useful for (I think) al
17 matches
Mail list logo
