Comments inlineOn 4/26/06, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Looking more closely, it seems I was wrong.Gbeans with a j2eeType=JCAManagedConnectionFactory have aconnectionFactoryInterface attribute that gives the name of the maininterface to use when binding the object to the JNDI context.
I agree with what Dain said. I also believe that as the spec says
the J2EE component enviroment should not be writable and we need not
provide any option for that either. It is not necessary. Apps can bind
to other namespaces.On 4/26/06, Dain Sundstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Are you planning o
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1883?page=comments#action_12376625
]
Erin Mulder commented on GERONIMO-1883:
---
I'm not sure how everything is set up right now (it looks like there's only one
space for all of Geronimo). However, it mig
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-73?page=all ]
Sachin Patel updated GERONIMODEVTOOLS-73:
-
Component: eclipse-plugin
Version: 1.0.0
Assign To: Sachin Patel
> Geronimo needs to support IModulePublishHelper.getPublis
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1923?page=all ]
Aaron Mulder resolved GERONIMO-1923:
Resolution: Fixed
> Many Geronimo 1.1 configs depend on non-G1.1 ActiveMQ configs
>
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1875?page=comments#action_12376618
]
Aaron Mulder commented on GERONIMO-1875:
Never mind that last comment -- I applied GERONIMO-1923 separately at Joe's
request.
> More work to port little-g to 1.1
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1923?page=all ]
Aaron Mulder updated GERONIMO-1923:
---
Attachment: activemq-deps.patch
> Many Geronimo 1.1 configs depend on non-G1.1 ActiveMQ configs
> -
Need to register the tomcat jndi url handler somehow
Key: GERONIMO-1924
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1924
Project: Geronimo
Type: Bug
Security: public (Regular issues)
Components: Tomca
Many Geronimo 1.1 configs depend on non-G1.1 ActiveMQ configs
-
Key: GERONIMO-1923
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1923
Project: Geronimo
Type: Bug
Security: public (Regular issues)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1703?page=all ]
Aaron Mulder updated GERONIMO-1703:
---
Fix Version: 1.1
(was: 1.2)
Version: (was: 1.0)
(was: 1.1)
(was: 1.2)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1483?page=all ]
Aaron Mulder updated GERONIMO-1483:
---
Fix Version: 1.1
Priority: Critical (was: Minor)
> During Undeploy entry in config.xml is not removed
> ---
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1532?page=all ]
Aaron Mulder updated GERONIMO-1532:
---
Priority: Critical (was: Minor)
Most likely fixed; need to review
> NullPointerException when a badly named jar is put into repository directory
> --
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1273?page=all ]
Aaron Mulder updated GERONIMO-1273:
---
Fix Version: 1.1
(was: 1.2)
Can at least name the protocol on the screen
> JMS Network Listener add dialogs should give some cont
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1531?page=all ]
Aaron Mulder updated GERONIMO-1531:
---
Fix Version: (was: 1.x)
(was: 1.2)
Consider equivalent functionality for new keystore portlet
> KeyStore portlet should suppo
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1875?page=all ]
Joe Bohn updated GERONIMO-1875:
---
Attachment: 1875_RemoveDeps3.patch
I would really, really like to have this patch applied
(1875_RemoveDeps3.patch). I've verified it with the web console on
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1271?page=all ]
Aaron Mulder updated GERONIMO-1271:
---
Fix Version: 1.1
(was: 1.2)
> Delete network listener action should ask for confirmation
> ---
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1182?page=all ]
Aaron Mulder updated GERONIMO-1182:
---
Fix Version: 1.1
(was: 1.2)
(was: 1.x)
> Connector portlet improvement (delete connector confirmation, more f
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1196?page=all ]
Aaron Mulder updated GERONIMO-1196:
---
Fix Version: 1.1
(was: 1.x)
Priority: Critical (was: Minor)
Need to make sure the new Keystore portlet forces an alias dur
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1802?page=all ]
Aaron Mulder updated GERONIMO-1802:
---
Priority: Blocker (was: Major)
> Console breakage in 1.1 branch
> --
>
> Key: GERONIMO-1802
> URL: http:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1906?page=all ]
Aaron Mulder resolved GERONIMO-1906:
Fix Version: 1.1
Resolution: Fixed
Assign To: Aaron Mulder
> Cannot add a new connector using ActiveMQManagerGBean
>
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1803?page=all ]
Aaron Mulder closed GERONIMO-1803:
--
Resolution: Fixed
Done in a lot of places. Remainder should have new issues as they come up.
> Manage by reference, not by name
>
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1285?page=all ]
Aaron Mulder updated GERONIMO-1285:
---
Priority: Critical (was: Major)
> Deployer does not list all modules that have been stopped
>
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1902?page=all ]
Aaron Mulder updated GERONIMO-1902:
---
Version: 1.1
(was: 1.0)
Priority: Critical (was: Major)
Those messages are expected, more or less.
Is there a functional probl
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1907?page=all ]
Aaron Mulder updated GERONIMO-1907:
---
Priority: Critical (was: Major)
> Deploy command should redeploy if the app is already deployed
>
Uncomment https test in org.apache.servicemix.http.HttpSpringTest#testSsl and
make it work
--
Key: SM-411
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-411
Project: ServiceMix
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1865?page=all ]
Aaron Mulder updated GERONIMO-1865:
---
Fix Version: 1.1
Version: 1.1
Priority: Critical (was: Major)
> Add ability to restart and reload configurations
>
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-803?page=all ]
Aaron Mulder updated GERONIMO-803:
--
Fix Version: 1.1
(was: 1.2)
Priority: Critical (was: Major)
Should be fixed, just need to test.
> Deploy failure during rede
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1285?page=all ]
Aaron Mulder updated GERONIMO-1285:
---
Fix Version: 1.1
(was: 1.2)
Review status as of current 1.1 build
> Deployer does not list all modules that have been stopped
> -
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-372?page=all ]
Guillaume Nodet resolved SM-372:
Fix Version: 3.0-M2
Resolution: Fixed
Assign To: Guillaume Nodet
Still need to find a working test case
> HTTPS support for the servicemix-htt
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1857?page=all ]
Aaron Mulder updated GERONIMO-1857:
---
Fix Version: 1.1
> Prompt before stopping a stopping a cofiguration that outher configurations
> depend on
> -
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1451?page=all ]
Aaron Mulder updated GERONIMO-1451:
---
Fix Version: (was: 1.2)
Priority: Critical (was: Major)
Should be working now, but of course good to test before the release.
> A new TCP
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1506?page=all ]
Aaron Mulder updated GERONIMO-1506:
---
Fix Version: (was: 1.2)
Priority: Critical (was: Major)
GERONIMO-1802 has a patch for the DB Info portlet, so this should be reviewed
in l
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1426?page=all ]
Aaron Mulder updated GERONIMO-1426:
---
Fix Version: (was: 1.2)
Priority: Critical (was: Major)
> DatabasePoolPortlet gets NPE when saving
> --
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1445?page=all ]
Aaron Mulder updated GERONIMO-1445:
---
Fix Version: 1.1
(was: 1.2)
Priority: Critical (was: Major)
> Allow deployment and use of exploded EAR modules
> -
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1690?page=all ]
Aaron Mulder updated GERONIMO-1690:
---
Priority: Critical (was: Major)
> Additional support for Targets passed into JSR88
>
>
> Key
By the way...
I need to apologize to the community for not informing of this earlier.
It was my intention to notify the lists of this and I forgot and
dropped the ball, so I apologize that I let it slip. I very sorry!
Jeff
Jeff Genender wrote:
> If anyone is at the MySQL conference...
>
> Sto
If anyone is at the MySQL conference...
Stop by the .org pavilion and say hello. There is an Apache geronimo
booth that was donated by the good guys at MySQL.
See you there ;-)
Jeff
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1383?page=all ]
Aaron Mulder updated GERONIMO-1383:
---
Fix Version: 1.1
(was: 1.2)
Priority: Critical (was: Major)
Should review for 1.1, I think/hope this is fixed
> Connector
Excellent doc! Some additional ideas inline
On Apr 23, 2006, at 8:07 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
Apache Geronimo Principles & Goals
=== Principles ===
* Be competitive with other application servers
* Be flexible to include exactly what a user wants (lightweight,
heavyweight,
produc
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1137?page=all ]
Aaron Mulder resolved GERONIMO-1137:
Fix Version: 1.1
(was: 1.2)
Resolution: Fixed
Now supports both JMS and JDBC deployments, which is good enough. There
I was wondering if someone could commit some patches for the XBean
project. I just sent in a patch for two issues (XBEAN-8 and XBEAN-9) and
would like to see those, and others, integrated in.
Here is a summary the outstanding issues with patches that need to get
committed:
XBEAN-2: XBean sho
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1071?page=all ]
Aaron Mulder resolved GERONIMO-1071:
Fix Version: 1.1
(was: 1.2)
Resolution: Fixed
We've now overridden Jetty so we control the SSL settings, and we apply
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-348?page=all ]
Aaron Mulder updated GERONIMO-348:
--
Fix Version: 1.1
(was: 1.2)
Priority: Critical (was: Major)
The validation required is pretty simple, and we get a lot of use
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XBEAN-9?page=comments#action_12376539 ]
Dan Diephouse commented on XBEAN-9:
---
I attached a patch for this to XBEAN-8. It can be used by doing:
/**
* @org.apache.xbean.Flat
* @return
*/
public Re
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1176?page=all ]
Aaron Mulder updated GERONIMO-1176:
---
Fix Version: 1.1
(was: 1.2)
Priority: Critical (was: Major)
We should validate the file, certainly.
We should not throw a
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XBEAN-8?page=all ]
Dan Diephouse updated XBEAN-8:
--
Attachment: flat.diff
This patch fixes XBEAN-8 and XBEAN-9
> Support flat collections
>
>
> Key: XBEAN-8
> URL: http://issu
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1491?page=all ]
Aaron Mulder closed GERONIMO-1491:
--
Fix Version: (was: 1.2)
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed by someone else, some time in the past
> ActiveMQ plan uses hardcoded obsolete org/apache/
Support flat properties
---
Key: XBEAN-9
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XBEAN-9
Project: XBean
Type: New Feature
Components: spring
Versions: 2.2
Reporter: Dan Diephouse
Assigned to: Dain Sundstrom
Right now in serv
Support flat collections
Key: XBEAN-8
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XBEAN-8
Project: XBean
Type: New Feature
Components: spring
Versions: 2.2
Reporter: Dan Diephouse
Assigned to: Dain Sundstrom
I would like to
Plugin Export should check for shared libs
--
Key: GERONIMO-1922
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1922
Project: Geronimo
Type: Improvement
Security: public (Regular issues)
Components: console
Ver
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-694?page=comments#action_36081 ]
Hiram Chirino commented on AMQ-694:
---
Could you describe the strange behaviour? Perhaps even submit a small unit
test for it?
> Probblem with "messageSelector" in 4.0 M3
>
Console should display context root for the installed web apps
--
Key: GERONIMO-1921
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1921
Project: Geronimo
Type: Improvement
Security: public (Regular
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1518?page=all ]
David Jencks reassigned GERONIMO-1518:
--
Assign To: Dain Sundstrom
Dain, can you take a look at the repo and config store changes here? I think
it might be better to copy our base clas
Hi Aaron,
I was looking at it as part of the documentation for v1.1.
Matt mentioned some graphics for deployment and based on those graphics I was planning to expand on
the "What's new - Architecture" section.
I think the outline is great and it should be easily accessible on the web site.
Ch
Hernan,
I am really looking for more discussion/feedback before posting this
as representative of the project at large. It would be more helpful
to have your comments on the content.
Thanks,
Aaron
On 4/26/06, Hernan Cunico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi All,
> I put in confluence the Princ
Hi All,
I put in confluence the Principles and Goals that Aaron wrote. These are listed as the first bullet
in the Geronimo v1.1 documentation.
Matt, do you have those graphics for Geronimo deployment options? I can include them if you send
them over :)
Here is the link to the Geronimo v1.1
Are you planning on making the J2EE component enviroment (java:comp/
env) writable? I can see making the global tree writable, but am
concerned about making the component environment itself writable.
The J2EE 1.4 spec page 64 states:
The container must ensure that the application component
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1918?page=all ]
Aaron Mulder resolved GERONIMO-1918:
Resolution: Fixed
> NoClassDefFoundError/ClassNotFoundException when attempting to deploy web app
> from console GUI
>
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-644?page=comments#action_12376510
]
Dain Sundstrom commented on GERONIMO-644:
-
If you build the server using the
-Dorg.apache.geronimo.kernel.config.Marshaler=org.apache.geronimo.kernel.config.xstream
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1920
On 4/26/06, Aaron Mulder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I get a test failure in modules/upgrade:
>
> Testcase: test5(org.apache.geronimo.upgrade.Upgrade1_0To1_1Test):
> Caused a
> n ERROR
> (No such file or directory)
> java.io.FileNotFoundE
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1920?page=all ]
David Jencks closed GERONIMO-1920:
--
Resolution: Fixed
added missing files.
> [Build Break] upgrade module: Test failure: assemblies_1 files in test-data
> missing.
>
Oops! the following produces a different CNFE (1.1 build from this
morning). I got the one mentioned by Joe when I tried to deploy the
same example from the console by pointing to
.maven//geronimo-samples/.
The other one is
Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: Could not lo
I get a test failure in modules/upgrade:
Testcase: test5(org.apache.geronimo.upgrade.Upgrade1_0To1_1Test): Caused a
n ERROR
(No such file or directory)
java.io.FileNotFoundException: (No such file or directory)
Where test5 refers to assembly_1.xml and I don't see that in src/test-data.
I
Looking more closely, it seems I was wrong.
Gbeans with a j2eeType=JCAManagedConnectionFactory have a
connectionFactoryInterface attribute that gives the name of the main
interface to use when binding the object to the JNDI context.
For EJB, GBeans with a j2eeType=StatelessSessionBean (or Entity
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1918?page=all ]
Joe Bohn updated GERONIMO-1918:
---
Attachment: snoop.war
I imagine any war will fail (perhaps only those without plans?) I was just
using snoop ... here it is.This deploys without erro
This can be reproduced by doing this on the console :
plugins --> search For Plugins --> Jakarta JSP Examples --> install
Plugin --> start Geronimo/geronimo-jsp-example/.../car.
There are 2 more issues related to this -
1. The following message gives the impression that the
j2ee-server.
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1920?page=all ]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-1920:
-
Priority: Blocker (was: Major)
> [Build Break] upgrade module: Test failure: assemblies_1 files in test-data
> missing.
> ---
[Build Break] upgrade module: Test failure: assemblies_1 files in test-data
missing.
Key: GERONIMO-1920
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1920
Project: Geronimo
Typ
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1918?page=comments#action_12376497
]
Paul McMahan commented on GERONIMO-1918:
The NoClassDefFoundError can be reproduced in the 1.1 console without a sample
WAR by trying to save a new db pool, jms re
Tim,
We have a workaround for some of these issues. I'll let Dain go into further detail. We should use
your testcase to see if this issue still remains or Dain's fix has mitigated it.
Tim Ellison (JIRA) wrote:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-644?page=comments#action_1237
Its been noted that we need a R/W JNDI Impl. I believe its on the roadmap.
Guillaume Nodet wrote:
When a JNDI context is created for a given configuration, the interface
name is used to determine the name of the gbean that will be mapped to
this JNDI reference (and to create a proxy ?).
Take
AG 1.1-SNAPSHOT has a memory leak when running DayTrader in Direct Mode
---
Key: GERONIMO-1919
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1919
Project: Geronimo
Type: Bug
Security: public
All,
I have AG 1.1-SNAPSHOT up and running. The intitial sniff of the DayTrader Direct mode looks pretty
good (except for the nasty memory leak). I'm investigating this now. Just wanted to make sure we
didn't have multiple folks chasing the same problem without coordinating.
Matt
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1918?page=comments#action_12376493
]
Aaron Mulder commented on GERONIMO-1918:
Please attach a sample WAR to reproduce this.
> NoClassDefFoundError/ClassNotFoundException when attempting to deploy web
At worst case adding duplicate jars with increase the size 1-1.5 megs.
Thank you for listening to my conversation with myself :)
- sachin
On Apr 26, 2006, at 10:05 AM, Sachin Patel wrote:
Ok playing around I think I figured out the problem, but its going
to be tricky getting a correct solu
NoClassDefFoundError/ClassNotFoundException when attempting to deploy web app
from console GUI
--
Key: GERONIMO-1918
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1918
Project:
Ok playing around I think I figured out the problem, but its going to
be tricky getting a correct solution. The issue is the following...
I'm supporting both V1 and V11 there are several jars at the same
versions between 1.0 and 1.1 namely (mx4j, commons-logging, spec
jars, etc..). Now I
Hi, Guillaume
I guess if a writable context is implemented still the
approach given above should work. As we will be using the
ENCConfigBuilder only to populate the ENC during startup the interfaces
can be used to refer to the gbeans representing the deployed
artefacts. Whatever we will be w
It seems that these informations are stored in the configuration which
is serialized and loaded when the configuration is started.
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Krishnakumar B wrote:
Hi Guillaume,
The ENCConfigBuilder and ComponentContextBuilder are called when u
deploy an application and need a J
Shoot, I was hoping a stand-alone test case would fail as well, but
it doesn't. :( So the issue is specific to invoking this within
eclipse bundles.
- sachin
On Apr 25, 2006, at 11:17 PM, Sachin Patel wrote:
I'm running into the following exception when launching 1.1 within
eclipse and
Hi Guillaume,
The ENCConfigBuilder and ComponentContextBuilder are called when u
deploy an application and need a JNDI reference. How does it happen
when u start the app server with some apps already deployed? How is
the Context built?
Regards
Krish
On 4/26/06, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-644?page=comments#action_12376424
]
Tim Ellison commented on GERONIMO-644:
--
Thanks Matt, to put it in context, this was one of the problems preventing G
coming up on Harmony class libraries (last May).
When a JNDI context is created for a given configuration, the interface
name is used to determine the name of the gbean that will be mapped to
this JNDI reference (and to create a proxy ?).
Take a look at o.a.g.naming.ENCConfigBuilder#addResourceRefs.
But I guess this is irrelevant if the object
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1911?page=comments#action_12376411
]
Vamsavardhana Reddy commented on GERONIMO-1911:
---
I think this JIRA is invalid. Here is the investigation I did.
I have added (since editHTTPS is not working
Thanks David.
Guillaume , Which proxy in the JNDI Tree are you
referring where geronimo requires the main interface name? Are
you speaking of UserTransaction etc? I thought those were standard
names that we can use to access them and will not be provided in DD?
Please clarify and correct me if I
85 matches
Mail list logo
