message is read from queue but not removed
--
Key: AMQ-716
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-716
Project: ActiveMQ
Type: Bug
Components: Message Store
Versions: 4.0
Environment: ActiveMQ Release
Create test suite to ensure that servicemix respect the WS-i standar (see
www:ws=i.org)
---
Key: SM-434
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-434
Project: ServiceMix
Project: Apache Geronimo
Status: Resolved, Closed (25 items)
Updated In Last: Week (7 days)
** Bug
* [GERONIMO-2034] [deployment] ensure output streams are closed in finally
blocks
* [GERONIMO-2035] [system] ensure input and output streams are closed in
finally blocks
* [GERONIMO-1997]
On May 18, 2006, at 11:50 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Developers,
I'm updating the Quick Start guide for Geronimo 1.1
(http://opensource.atlassian.com/confluence/oss/display/GERONIMO/
Geronimo+v1.1+-+Quick+start+-+Apache+Geronimo+for+the+impatient).
Does Geronimo 1.1 out of the box
I've added a new skeleton document, Geronimo v1.1 - Multiple Server
Configurations
(http://opensource.atlassian.com/confluence/oss/display/GERONIMO/Geronimo+v1.1+-+Multiple+Server+Configurations)
to the Confluence Wiki if someone more knowledgable (*cough* Hernan
*cough*) wants to flesh out the
+1 to Matt's suggestion. I know that there are already users working on
unstable builds of 1.1. While I think that they understand 1.1 isn't
final yet ... we've already forced them to change a good many things.
I think it would be nice to avoid any more for 1.1 so I'd vote for
option #1.
Dear Developers,
A user recently posed the following question on the Maven Users mailing
list:
By the way, is Glassfish the only open source application server
implementing the whole JEE 5 right now?
Is there a site we can point them to (preferably on geronimo.apache.org)
that would
My 2c is that I prefer Matt's idea of grouping the server specific
directories beneath a servers directory. As a new user exploring
the directory structure I would find that intuitive. But I'm hesitant
to base my position solely on this empathetic gut feel because I'm
wondering which parts of
Geronimo 1.3 Mail API : RFC EncodeText and DecodeText methods does nothing
---
Key: GERONIMO-2041
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2041
Project: Geronimo
Type: Bug
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-79?page=comments#action_12412529
]
Lin Sun commented on GERONIMODEVTOOLS-79:
-
This bug is reported to WTP 1.5, as a hot bug:
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=141850
wtp
Has anyone heard when the server problem affecting the Codehaus CVS and
SVN repos will be fixed, so we can get outstanding patches applied to
OpenEJB, TranQL, ActiveMQ, ... and generate versioned releases for 1.1?
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2041?page=all ]
Rick McGuire reassigned GERONIMO-2041:
--
Assign To: Rick McGuire
Geronimo 1.3 Mail API : RFC EncodeText and DecodeText methods does nothing
On 5/19/06, Donald Woods [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone heard when the server problem affecting the Codehaus CVS and
SVN repos will be fixed, so we can get outstanding patches applied to
OpenEJB, TranQL, ActiveMQ, ... and generate versioned releases for 1.1?
See the following blog entries
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2041?page=all ]
Rick McGuire resolved GERONIMO-2041:
Fix Version: 1.1
Resolution: Fixed
The javamail spec version shipping with Geronimo 1.0 was only a partial
implementation, particularly
I think we will be taking this further and have a more robust roadmap
for Geronimo on the wiki that will track the direction and hopefully
back that up with tracking JIRAs, so we can see where we are at.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Developers,
A user recently posed the following question on
ConfigurationAwareReference needs Serial Version UID
Key: GERONIMO-2042
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2042
Project: Geronimo
Type: Bug
Security: public (Regular issues)
Components:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2011?page=all ]
Matt Hogstrom closed GERONIMO-2011:
---
Resolution: Fixed
Sendingminimal-jetty-server/src/var/log/server-log4j.properties
Sending
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2011?page=comments#action_12412574
]
Matt Hogstrom commented on GERONIMO-2011:
-
Forgot the rev number for the commit.
Sendingminimal-jetty-server/src/var/log/server-log4j.properties
Sending
Hi Matt,
Will minimal-tomcat-server and minimal-jetty-server be available as binary
distributions on the Geronimo Download Site
(http://geronimo.apache.org/downloads.html) when 1.1 is released?
Thanks,
Ian
It's better to be hated for who you are
than loved for who you are not
Ian D. Stewart
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-55?page=comments#action_12412577
]
Donald Woods commented on GERONIMODEVTOOLS-55:
--
The following platformURL no longer works, as the referenced location no longer
exists on the Eclipse
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-55?page=all ]
Donald Woods updated GERONIMODEVTOOLS-55:
-
Summary: Update build to use Eclipse 3.1.2 SDK (was: Update build to
use Eclipse 3.1.2 and EMF 2.1.2)
Environment: Maven
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2006?page=all ]
Paul McMahan updated GERONIMO-2006:
---
Attachment: GERONIMO-2006.patch
I was able to recreate the problem on tomcat. It is caused by a buffer overrun
when render parameters that are set
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2006?page=all ]
Paul McMahan updated GERONIMO-2006:
---
Attachment: deployment_portlet.jpg
attaching screenshot of deployment portlet shown providing an upgraded plan
Deploying an application with an
On 5/12/06, Paul McMahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, I think you (or someone) mentioned earlier that it might be
useful to make this utility available from the admin console. Seems
like one reasonable approach would be to enable the current
application deployment portlet to detect when a
All,
A great time was had at JavaOne, including a variety of
Geronimo-related meetings, hacking time in the W and Moscone, a BOF, a
party, etc. Here are some thoughts I put together based on the bits I
was involved with, which I think we'd all like to run by everyone who
couldn't be there.
Yes, one for *nix and one for Windows each :)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Matt,
Will minimal-tomcat-server and minimal-jetty-server be available as binary
distributions on the Geronimo Download Site
(http://geronimo.apache.org/downloads.html) when 1.1 is released?
Thanks,
Ian
It's better to
Donald,
Once Codehaus is backup we need to re-apply some missing patches. I think we'll be able to cut an
unstable release this weekend.
Bruce Snyder wrote:
On 5/19/06, Donald Woods [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone heard when the server problem affecting the Codehaus CVS and
SVN repos
On May 19, 2006, at 9:43 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Donald,
Once Codehaus is backup we need to re-apply some missing patches.
I think we'll be able to cut an unstable release this weekend.
Bruce Snyder wrote:
On 5/19/06, Donald Woods [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone heard when the
inline..
--- Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On May 19, 2006, at 9:43 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Donald,
Once Codehaus is backup we need to re-apply some missing patches.
I think we'll be able to cut an unstable release this weekend.
Bruce Snyder wrote:
On 5/19/06,
I concur. I'm gonna pack it in for tonight and will check in the morning
sometime.
Kevan Miller wrote:
On May 19, 2006, at 9:43 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Donald,
Once Codehaus is backup we need to re-apply some missing patches. I
think we'll be able to cut an unstable release this
30 matches
Mail list logo
