Hi All I am getting this error while deploying my EAR on geronimo...I have JDK1.4.2.06java.lang.IllegalStateException: Cannot compare MethodTransaction: interface null, methodName *, parameters: transaction attribute:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and MethodTransaction: interface null, methodName *, parameter
I noticed that there are lines in the pages that you have to scroll
right to read. For example, open
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxMoinMoin/Advanced_Plugin_Sample
and look at the bullet points after the words "Here are some things to
note". Any idea what is happening there?
mmmkay ;-)
--jason
On Aug 3, 2006, at 9:34 PM, Bill Dudney wrote:
nm, i was on
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/branches/m2migration
instead of
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/sandbox/svkmerge/m2migration
little details like the wrong branch make all the difference...
s
nm, i was on
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/branches/m2migration
instead of
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/sandbox/svkmerge/m2migration
little details like the wrong branch make all the difference...
sorry for the rabit trail...
TTFN,
-bd-
On Aug 3, 2006, at 10:03 PM,
Thanks Hiram. Yes, I did that and got it working.
(I retracted the posting from the Nabble web site, but I guess it was
already forwarded)
On 8/3/06, Hiram Chirino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Komandur,
As long as your META-INF directory is in the classpath it should get
picked up. Please no
Ok so back on the m2 branch I get failures for the corba spec jar.
We had talked about this a while back and had changed the groupId for
the geronimo-spec-corba pom (currently geronimo-spec, but the
geronimo pom is expecting it to be org.apache.geronimo.specs) but
that patch was reverted fo
I would think it's the activemq-ra.jar but I'll have to double check.
On 8/3/06, Dain Sundstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Looking at the examples in the Jencks project, I see the use of the
following namespace:
xmlns:amqra="http://activemq.org/ra/1.0";
but I can't seem to find which jar/ve
must have gotten ahead of myself, I have the m2migration branch
checked out too
I guess I saw bootstrap in the trunk and figured the merge was done
but the wiki not updated yet.
sorry for the rabbit trail, now going back to the m2 branch
TTFN,
-bd-
On Aug 3, 2006, at 9:12 PM, Jason Dillo
Well... if you were following the instructions in the wiki to build
with m2 you should have been using this branch:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/sandbox/svkmerge/
m2migration/
Soon to be merged to trunk
--jason
On Aug 3, 2006, at 7:53 PM, Bill Dudney wrote:
Hi Jason,
T
Hi Komandur,
As long as your META-INF directory is in the classpath it should get
picked up. Please note that we do this with the activemq-optional
jar. It contains a bunch of FactoryFinder services that activemq can
successfully look up.
On 8/3/06, Komandur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I hav
On 8/3/06, Nathan Mittler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hiram,
I've updated the docs so that there's two separate directories:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/activemq/site/cms
- This has just the cms API
and
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/activemq/site/activemq-cpp
- This
Hi Jason,
Thanks for the reply. I knew I must be missing a patch or something,
I don't have an m2-assemblies directory. Is that in a patch or do I
need to grab the m2 branch?
Thanks again,
-bd-
breck:~/Development/geronimo bdudney$ svn info
Path: .
URL: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ge
Are you looking in:
m2-assemblies/geronimo-tomcat-j2ee/target ?
--jason
On Aug 3, 2006, at 7:37 PM, Bill Dudney wrote:
Thanks Prasad,
I did a bootstrap and a mvn clean install before posting. But I get
no geronimo-tomcat-j2ee-1.2-SNAPSHOT.tar.gz. Am I not supposed to
any more? The m
Thanks Prasad,
I did a bootstrap and a mvn clean install before posting. But I get
no geronimo-tomcat-j2ee-1.2-SNAPSHOT.tar.gz. Am I not supposed to any
more? The m1 build still works like a champ and produces the .tar.gz
files so I assumed that I'd get something similar with the m2 build..
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2071?page=all ]
Jason Dillon reassigned GERONIMO-2071:
--
Assignee: Jason Dillon (was: Jacek Laskowski)
> Move Geronimo build to M2 (new 1.2 trunk)
> -
>
>
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2224?page=comments#action_12425655
]
Matt Hogstrom commented on GERONIMO-2224:
-
This is actually a bug. A user reported that the server became unstable when
they set this property and we
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2224?page=comments#action_12425651
]
Matt Hogstrom commented on GERONIMO-2224:
-
Let's add this. Its a bug :)...I'll pop it in.
> Add a geronimo specific system property for controlling do
Hi Bill,
The m2 assembly works.
Here's how you can build one yourself -
http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDEV/building-apache-geronimo-with-maven-2.html
For an assembly already on a repo -
http://people.apache.org/maven-snapshot-repository/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-jetty-j2ee/1.2-SNAPSH
Hiram,
I've updated the docs so that there's two separate directories:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/activemq/site/cms
- This has just the cms API
and
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/activemq/site/activemq-cpp
- This has the all the implementation code
It's a little fun
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2271?page=comments#action_12425627
]
David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-2271:
I have never understood what the intended meaning of these "serverwide" or
app-specific labels might be. AFAI
I have my own discovery agent and I am trying to make FactoryFinder look in
the
META-INF of that package. However, it seems to work only when I put
myscheme file here:
activemq-core/.../META-INF/services/org/apache/activemq/transport/discoveryagent/myscheme
How can I make FactoryFinder look
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2063?page=all ]
Donald Woods updated GERONIMO-2063:
---
Patch Info: [Patch Available]
Fix Version/s: 1.1.2
(was: 1.1.x)
> Stopping a TSSbean also stops the orb it's attached to
Sounds like everyone likes this work. I'll start working on a formal
patch for review.
-dain
On Aug 3, 2006, at 12:10 PM, Hiram Chirino wrote:
+1 great job dain. This is a great move toward making geronimo
components more decoupled and more re-usable.
On 7/31/06, Dain Sundstrom <[EMAIL PR
Update downloadable JDBC driver versions
Key: GERONIMO-2273
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2273
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Task
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2269?page=all ]
Aaron Mulder updated GERONIMO-2269:
---
Attachment: 2269-fix-jndi-while-reloading.patch
> Error after redeploy (with no version in module ID)
> ---
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-93?page=comments#action_12425617
]
Jeff Genender commented on GERONIMODEVTOOLS-93:
---
+1
> Support for non-plugin archives for installable runtimes
> --
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2269?page=all ]
Aaron Mulder updated GERONIMO-2269:
---
Summary: Error after redeploy (with no version in module ID)
(was: Error after redeploy (with no version in module ID) (branches/1.1.1))
Sepand,
One possible gotcha I haven't heard anyone bring up that we should
address is to make sure that someone can't just "fake" the DN in the
username field through a normal login and make the system think it's
authenticated with the certificate.
-Kelly
On 8/3/06, Hiram Chirino <[EMAIL PROTEC
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2269?page=all ]
Aaron Mulder updated GERONIMO-2269:
---
Attachment: 2269-fix-jndi-while-reloading.patch
Problem finally was that the ConfigurationModel thinks that the new
Configuration being reloaded was s
Does the m2 assembly work yet? I'm searching through the archives and
I could have sworn I saw a bit on how to get an assembly with m2 but
now I can't find it.
If some one would summarize how I'd be glad to document it on the wiki.
Thanks!
-bd-
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-854?page=all ]
Nathan Mittler reopened AMQ-854:
separate documentation between the cms API and activemq-cpp
> Update to activemq-cpp source to enable documentation generation
> ---
It is set for Anonymous to view only, not sure why if you are logged in
it will not let you s view it. Either way I explicitly added view access
to geronimo-users and confluence-user, that should do the trick.
Let me know if it still fights back.
Cheers!
Hernan
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
Scratch t
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2269?page=comments#action_12425605
]
Aaron Mulder commented on GERONIMO-2269:
OK, more info...
At the time start is called on the new configuration (around
SimpleConfigurationManager:982)
I would like an RTC for the following change in devtools trunkhttp://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-93?page=allthx -sachin
Scratch that. It will let me view the site as long as I am NOT
logged in. As soon as I login in, I the space is removed from my
dashboard.
-dain
On Aug 3, 2006, at 1:27 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
I doesn't work for me. Is there any reason not to open read access
to everyone?
-dain
On
I doesn't work for me. Is there any reason not to open read access
to everyone?
-dain
On Aug 3, 2006, at 1:19 PM, Hernan Cunico wrote:
yeah, not sure why that is happening. What worked for others was to
log out and log in again. It must be a caching thingy.
Let me know if that doesn't wor
yeah, not sure why that is happening. What worked for others was to log
out and log in again. It must be a caching thingy.
Let me know if that doesn't work.
Cheers!
Hernan
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
I don't seem to have the permissions to view that space.
-dain
On Aug 3, 2006, at 11:34 AM, Hernan
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2269?page=comments#action_12425601
]
Aaron Mulder commented on GERONIMO-2269:
OK, the exception above is actually a problem *trying to restart the old web
app* after the deployment of the
On Aug 3, 2006, at 9:55 AM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
On Aug 2, 2006, at 11:29 PM, David Jencks wrote:
On Aug 2, 2006, at 10:53 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
I'm working on the Jencks project again and have discovered that
the container managed security and pool partition by-subject
doesn't work
I wouldn't need a fake truststore. I would use a custom truststore that would
use a custom login module to authenticate the client via certificate (LDAP
would be just one of the login modules) and return authenticated subject and
principals.
This return seems complicated so fake truststore was an
On Aug 3, 2006, at 12:20 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
Hi,
While working on some classloader code I noticed this:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/trunk/modules/kernel/src/java/
org/apache/geronimo/kernel/classloader/
Do you think that could be put in a separate module so that I could
use
Looking at the examples in the Jencks project, I see the use of the
following namespace:
xmlns:amqra="http://activemq.org/ra/1.0";
but I can't seem to find which jar/version contains that namespace.
Anyone know which published jar has that ns?
Thanks,
-dain
Hi,
While working on some classloader code I noticed this:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/trunk/modules/kernel/src/java/
org/apache/geronimo/kernel/classloader/
Do you think that could be put in a separate module so that I could
use it in ClassWorlds?
Thanks,
Jason van Zyl
[EMAIL
Good idea ... I'll take care of that this evening.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of Hiram Chirino
> Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006 12:25 PM
> To: activemq-dev@geronimo.apache.org
> Subject: Re: auto-generating documentation for C++
+1 great job dain. This is a great move toward making geronimo
components more decoupled and more re-usable.
On 7/31/06, Dain Sundstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
About a week ago there was a discussion on the OpenEJB mailing list
regarding the TransactionContextManager. In OpenEJB 3 we remov
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1700?page=comments#action_12425589
]
Manu T George commented on GERONIMO-1700:
-
This error occurs because two different apps (with different configIds) have
the same context root.
If you h
I don't seem to have the permissions to view that space.
-dain
On Aug 3, 2006, at 11:34 AM, Hernan Cunico wrote:
Hi All,
I've been reviewing the content we have in the Moin Moin wiki and
it is way more out of date than I thought it would be.
I initially thought that it would be easier to d
Hi All,
I've been reviewing the content we have in the Moin Moin wiki and it is
way more out of date than I thought it would be.
I initially thought that it would be easier to do the "housekeeping"
once we had the content migrated to Confluence but after a more detailed
analysis of the actual
Hi Sepand,
4.1 and 4.0 branches are not that different yet. If you need your
solution for 4.0, go ahead and do it. Chances are we will only apply
it only to 4.1 (since this a new feature).
On 8/3/06, Sepand M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks Hiram. That sounds great.
I guess my last questio
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2272?page=all ]
Kevan Miller resolved GERONIMO-2272.
Resolution: Fixed
Updated explicit_versions.properties to specify 1.2-SNAPSHOT as the appropriate
version for the javamail spec.
> Fix bad javamail
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2272?page=all ]
Kevan Miller updated GERONIMO-2272:
---
Summary: Fix bad javamail version in explicit_versions.properties (was:
Fix bad javamail version in)
> Fix bad javamail version in explicit_versions.
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2269?page=comments#action_12425585
]
Aaron Mulder commented on GERONIMO-2269:
Maybe caused by the JNDI reference (a ConfigurationAwareReference) having the
wrong Configuration set on it?
Dain,
I fixed GERONIMO-2270 (redeploy when module ID includes version but
not type) but this did not fix GERONIMO-2269 (redeploy with
resource-ref when module ID includes artifact only). There's a stack
trace in the Jira -- any suggestions on how to pursue it?
http://issues.apache.org/jira/brow
Fix bad javamail version in
Key: GERONIMO-2272
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2272
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
Affects Versions: 1.2
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2270?page=all ]
Aaron Mulder updated GERONIMO-2270:
---
Attachment: 2270-fix-redeploy-no-type.patch
Here's a patch that can be applied to branches/1.1.1 to fix this problem
Already applied to branches/1.1
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-93?page=all ]
Sachin Patel updated GERONIMODEVTOOLS-93:
-
Patch Info: [Patch Available]
Issue Type: RTC (was: Improvement)
> Support for non-plugin archives for installable runtimes
> --
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-93?page=all ]
Sachin Patel updated GERONIMODEVTOOLS-93:
-
Attachment: GERONIMODEVTOOLS-93.patch
> Support for non-plugin archives for installable runtimes
> --
Yes,
Kevan addresses a memory leak within the last two days. Try it on branches/1.1.1 or the current
branches/1.1 (which is now 1.2-SNAPSHOT).
Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
I am using HotDeployer extensively. After repeated use, the server is
running into memory problems.
I have built the ser
Aaron,
I missed the cut off for 1.1.1 on the three JIRA's I had. I'll move the remaining 1.1.1s to 1.1.2
and then we'll cut a 1.1.2 a few weeks after 1.1.1. Perhaps this is the start of the fast and
furious release cycle that Hiram loves so much :)
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
On Aug 3, 2006, a
cool... let me change and see...
- Original Message -
From: "Philip Dodds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006 11:05 PM
Subject: Re: creating a standard JBI Component using servicemix-common
module
I believe the only XML change after refactoring the class names
Refactoring is done... no issues... just wasn't sure about the xmls...:-)
Will give it a try if mvn install still works then I guess all is OK
- Original Message -
From: "Guillaume Nodet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006 11:03 PM
Subject: Re: creating a standard
I believe the only XML change after refactoring the class names is to change
the pom.xml entries for the component class name (towards the end)
P
On 8/3/06, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If you have renamed the file, where is your problem ?
Using eclipse, you can easily refactor t
If you have renamed the file, where is your problem ?
Using eclipse, you can easily refactor the code and it will change
everything needed
(at least in java files).
I don' t how using ant will help you on that.
On 8/3/06, Soumadeep-Infravio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ok then for the time being,
Ok then for the time being, let me then follow the same dir structure and
use ant to get things moving.
Are you ok with that?
Soumadeep
- Original Message -
From: "Guillaume Nodet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006 7:15 PM
Subject: Re: creating a standard JBI C
OK, well, I'm working on it. :)
Thanks,
Aaron
On 8/3/06, Dain Sundstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Aug 3, 2006, at 10:11 AM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
> On 8/3/06, Dain Sundstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2269
>>
>> My guess is this one is
On Aug 3, 2006, at 10:11 AM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
On 8/3/06, Dain Sundstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2269
My guess is this one is a side effect of the next one, so I'd fix
2270 first and rerun this test case.
I will, though I disagree with you
On 8/3/06, Dain Sundstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2269
My guess is this one is a side effect of the next one, so I'd fix
2270 first and rerun this test case.
I will, though I disagree with your guess -- 2270 is a problem before
the call ever g
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2271?page=comments#action_12425567
]
Vamsavardhana Reddy commented on GERONIMO-2271:
---
And I could deploy a second web application that authenticates against the
security realm in the
On Aug 3, 2006, at 9:18 AM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
I think this is a blocker.
I tried redeploying a web application, both with and without a version
in the module ID. It failed both ways, though differently for each.
Matt, do you mind if we work on this in the 1.1.1 branch?
I'd say it should b
On Aug 2, 2006, at 11:29 PM, David Jencks wrote:
On Aug 2, 2006, at 10:53 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
I'm working on the Jencks project again and have discovered that
the container managed security and pool partition by-subject
doesn't work oustide of Geronimo since both depend on obtaining
On Aug 2, 2006, at 11:57 PM, David Jencks wrote:
On Jul 31, 2006, at 4:09 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
About a week ago there was a discussion on the OpenEJB mailing
list regarding the TransactionContextManager. In OpenEJB 3 we
removed the use of the TCM from Geronimo and replaced it with j
Security Realm deployed as part of a web app listed as "Serverwide"
---
Key: GERONIMO-2271
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2271
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type:
On 8/3/06, Matt Hogstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is this a regression or is the first test?
It looks like 1.1 has the same problems for the same test application.
I haven't tried this particular application before -- it is a Spring
app I pulled off the shelf to make sure 1.1.1 didn't have pr
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2270?page=all ]
Aaron Mulder updated GERONIMO-2270:
---
Description:
Tried to redeploy a WAR in 1.1.1. Got the following (note, I did actually
"redeploy"):
No ModuleID or TargetModuleID provided. Att
Calls for a JIRA.
VamsiOn 8/3/06, Aaron Mulder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sounds like a bug to me.Thanks, AaronOn 8/3/06, Vamsavardhana Reddy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> Hi,>> I have deployed a web application with its own security realm. The new
> security realm is shown as "Serverwide" in
Sounds like a bug to me.
Thanks,
Aaron
On 8/3/06, Vamsavardhana Reddy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I have deployed a web application with its own security realm. The new
security realm is shown as "Serverwide" in Security Realms portlet. Is this
the way it should be or is it a bug?
Hi,
I have deployed a web application with its own security realm.
The new security realm is shown as "Serverwide" in Security Realms
portlet. Is this the way it should be or is it a bug?
Thanks,
Vamsi
I am using HotDeployer extensively. After repeated use, the server is running into memory problems.
I have built the server from branches/1.1. The last time I
updated my source tree is two days ago. Has this problem been
addressed in the past two days?
Regards,
Vamsi
Is this a regression or is the first test?
Aaron Mulder wrote:
I think this is a blocker.
I tried redeploying a web application, both with and without a version
in the module ID. It failed both ways, though differently for each.
Matt, do you mind if we work on this in the 1.1.1 branch?
Dain
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2237?page=comments#action_12425558
]
Aaron Mulder commented on GERONIMO-2237:
I tested a web application WAR using Spring 1 and Hibernate 2 with the
branches/1.1.1 build and it worked (wit
I think this is a blocker.
I tried redeploying a web application, both with and without a version
in the module ID. It failed both ways, though differently for each.
Matt, do you mind if we work on this in the 1.1.1 branch?
Dain or David Jencks, any chance you could look at the "without a
vers
I thought the NOTICE file for Derby was just that its ASF code? Or is
the specific Deby stuff that needs adding to the NOTICE file?
On 8/3/06, Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Hiram,
Is the NOTICE file correct? I believe you need a NOTICE for derby, at
least.
Also, the shell scripts i
Redeploy broken in 1.1.1
Key: GERONIMO-2270
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2270
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
Components: deployment
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2269?page=all ]
Aaron Mulder updated GERONIMO-2269:
---
Summary: Error after redeploy (with no version in module ID)
(branches/1.1.1) (was: Error after failed redeploy with no version in module
ID (bra
Error after failed redeploy with no version in module ID (branches/1.1.1)
-
Key: GERONIMO-2269
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2269
Project: Geronimo
Web app adds a dependency to myloginmodule-1.0.jar in the repository but not the security realm.
Thanks,
VamsiOn 8/3/06, Aaron Mulder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Does the environment for your web app list a dependency on the security realm?Thanks, AaronOn 8/3/06, Vamsavardhana Reddy <[EMAIL PRO
On Aug 3, 2006, at 7:35 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
Hi,
I have deployed a Custom Security Realm using MyLoginModule and
MyPrincipal classes. I have configured a simple web application to
authenticate against this realm. Even though the login succeeds, I
am getting an HTTP 403 Forbid
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2264?page=comments#action_12425533
]
Aaron Mulder commented on GERONIMO-2264:
I guess we also need to:
- create an OpenEJB 2.1.1 branch
- update the Geronimo 1.1.1 branch to refer to the
Does the environment for your web app list a dependency on the security realm?
Thanks,
Aaron
On 8/3/06, Vamsavardhana Reddy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I have deployed a Custom Security Realm using MyLoginModule and MyPrincipal
classes. I have configured a simple web application to au
Hi,
I have deployed a Custom Security Realm using MyLoginModule and
MyPrincipal classes. I have configured a simple web application
to authenticate against this realm. Even though the login
succeeds, I am getting an HTTP 403 Forbidden error. But
everything works fine if I change MyLoginModule t
I agree with this, I only think it will be a tough job.
I also have a deadline, so I suggest that we split the work.
I may take custom truststore and certificate authentication against LDAP (I
already have idea how to do it) but I am open to suggestions.
Regards,
NGC
Sepand M wrote:
>
> Ok.
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-854?page=all ]
Nathan Mittler resolved AMQ-854.
Resolution: Fixed
The documentation has been added to http://activemq.org/site/javadocs.html
> Update to activemq-cpp source to enable documentation generati
Awesome! Thanks.
On 8/3/06, James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 8/3/06, James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There you go...
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/activemq/site/cms/
>
> hopefully in an hour or so it should show up here
> http://incubator.apache.org/active
Resolved it... problem with classpath.
It created two eclipse related files
1) .project
2) .classpath
The problem is when I import this project into Eclipse it doesn't resolve
the classapth.
Do I need to do anything else?
Thanks
Soumadeep
- Original Message -
From: "Guillaume Nodet
What do you mean by not OK ?
On 8/3/06, Soumadeep-Infravio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Guillaume,
I guess I got past this by re-building smx. What I am stuck with now is
that
eclipse is complaining that the project that was created using the command
mvn eclipse:eclipse is not OK.
Have you trie
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1476?page=comments#action_12425475
]
Chris Cardona commented on GERONIMO-1476:
-
Donald,
I wasn't able to replicate this problem. I modified the root logger level from
log4j.rootCategory=I
Guillaume,
I guess I got past this by re-building smx. What I am stuck with now is that
eclipse is complaining that the project that was created using the command
mvn eclipse:eclipse is not OK.
Have you tried doing it lately?
Thanks
Soumadeep
- Original Message -
From: "Guillaume N
On 8/3/06, David Jencks <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> UserTransaction> ---> TransactionManagerImpl now implements UserTransaction to ease> integration with third party libraries such as SpringWhy is this a good idea? This strikes me as a bad idea since a user
can successfully cast Use
See http://servicemix.goopen.org/site/building.html
On 8/3/06, vikas kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks.
Can you send me the steps to do it. i am a newbie.
~Vikas
On 8/3/06, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We currently have problems uploading snapshots.
> Even in this case,
You can also download the archetype from
http://people.apache.org/maven-snapshot-repository/org/apache/servicemix/tooling/servicemix-service-engine/1.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT/servicemix-service-engine-1.0-incubating-20060803.064327-5.jar
and put it in your local maven repo under
~/.m2/org/apache/se
1 - 100 of 107 matches
Mail list logo
