Congrates Kevan ,
On 8/10/06, Alan D. Cabrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Matt Hogstrom wrote:> Please welcome Kevan Miller as the newest member of the Geronimo PMC.> Kevan recently accepted the invitation to join the PMC. As such we
> now have an additional set of eyes to help with reviews as w
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
All,
We're pleased to let you know that we have a new committer in our
midst. Paul McMahan has recently accepted an invitation to join the
Geronimo project. Paul has been active on Geronimo for several months
and has provided numerous patches for the console and related
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Please welcome Kevan Miller as the newest member of the Geronimo PMC.
Kevan recently accepted the invitation to join the PMC. As such we
now have an additional set of eyes to help with reviews as well as
other PMC oversight responsibilities. Kevan has shown that he is no
There's a ring of truth in these paragraphs.
Regards,
Alan
Jason Dillon wrote:
For the record, I do think that it is a good idea to split G up into
some smaller chunks... I am just concerned about how small the chunks
become and how it may eventually lead to chaos I've been there
before
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2295?page=all ]
Alan Cabrera resolved GERONIMO-2295.
Resolution: Fixed
> Web app security constraint ignored if url-pattern doesn't match servlet
> mapping exactly
> ---
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XBEAN-39?page=all ]
Stefan Kleineikenscheidt updated XBEAN-39:
--
Attachment: XBEAN-39.patch
Patch attached.
Solution: After everyting else has failed, XBean tries to look up a system
property 'xbean.dir'.
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2295?page=all ]
Alan Cabrera updated GERONIMO-2295:
---
Fix Version/s: 1.2
> Web app security constraint ignored if url-pattern doesn't match servlet
> mapping exactly
>
NPE in XBeanHelper.createBeanDefinitionReader with some Classloaders
Key: XBEAN-39
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XBEAN-39
Project: XBean
Issue Type: Bug
Aff
attaching modified geronimo-web.xml and openejb-jar.xml in which i have added admin-object-linkThanksManishOn 8/10/06, Manish Satwani <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Hi All,I am stillg getting this erro during deployment.
Unable to resolve resource reference 'jms/AcevaPublisherQueue' (Could not auto-map
>> 1. can we use an 'elastic prefetch' buffer based on a sliding window (like
>> in TCP) - this reacts to client (mis)behavior
>We could start with a prefetch of 1 and increase it over time for well
>behaving clients. However it doesn't fix the problem as a mis-behaving
>consumer could still hog
On Aug 9, 2006, at 10:04 PM, John Sisson wrote:
I am trying to build the eclipse project files for a clean 1.1 build.
I did the following:
* svn co https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/branches/1.1
* cd 1.1
* maven m:fresh-checkout
* maven new
* maven m:eclipse -o
The m:eclipse processi
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2306?page=all ]
Kevan Miller resolved GERONIMO-2306.
Resolution: Fixed
I added ASL license and notice information to the license and notice files for
the geronimo-util jar. I also added Bouncy Castle l
For the record, I do think that it is a good idea to split G up into
some smaller chunks... I am just concerned about how small the chunks
become and how it may eventually lead to chaos I've been there
before and would like to avoid it in the future.
I am not against moving transaction
For future reference. This code is vastly improved, but this little
guy is going to change our world once again.
http://java.sun.com/javaee/5/docs/api/javax/transaction/
TransactionSynchronizationRegistry.html
Can't wait Then there'll be a standard interface for 100% of
what we're do
I am trying to build the eclipse project files for a clean 1.1 build.
I did the following:
* svn co https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/branches/1.1
* cd 1.1
* maven m:fresh-checkout
* maven new
* maven m:eclipse -o
The m:eclipse processing fails in OpenEJB itests. How do I get the
gero
Kay :-)
--jason
On Aug 9, 2006, at 6:52 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
Jason,
One of the things we discussed was to write/modify our plugins such
that some oft used goals like start/stop servers, deploy/undeploy
apps, start/stop apps will write it's output to a surefire like xml in
the target/sur
Jason,
One of the things we discussed was to write/modify our plugins such
that some oft used goals like start/stop servers, deploy/undeploy
apps, start/stop apps will write it's output to a surefire like xml in
the target/surefire-reports dir.
Using the cargo plugin would not give us this abili
Why?
That means a new trunk and added overhead to release and manage...
:-\
--jason
On Aug 9, 2006, at 6:42 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
What do everyone think about changing the transaction and connector
modules to be versioned independently of the main Geronimo server?
-dain
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2307?page=all ]
John Sisson reassigned GERONIMO-2307:
-
Assignee: Geir Magnusson Jr (was: John Sisson)
Geir said he will follow this up.
> Include appropriate license for the Sun j2ee schema files that
Agreed. I think these modules are of the most reusable (and reused) part of G.This would also ensure maximum reusability by avoiding unnecessary ties to theremaining of Geronimo.
On 8/10/06, Dain Sundstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What do everyone think about changing the transaction and connect
What do everyone think about changing the transaction and connector
modules to be versioned independently of the main Geronimo server?
-dain
Include appropriate license for the Sun j2ee schema files that are redistributed
Key: GERONIMO-2307
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2307
Project: Geron
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2306?page=all ]
Kevan Miller updated GERONIMO-2306:
---
Summary: Add ASL info to LICENSE/NOTICE files in geronimo-util jar file
and BouncyCastle info to root directory LICENSE/NOTICE (was: Add BouncyCas
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2305?page=comments#action_12427069
]
David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-2305:
I think this is caused by someone calling
new URL(url, string)
where url is created using our JarFileUrlStrea
Add BouncyCastle LICENSE/NOTICE information to to geronimo-util jar file and
root directory LICENSE/NOTICE
--
Key: GERONIMO-2306
URL: http://issues.apache.org/
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-850?page=comments#action_36740 ]
Maxim Fateev commented on AMQ-850:
--
I think ideal solution would include self adjusting prefetch buffer size. At
the beginning it couild be 1 but then increased if
The merge is complete. Thanks to everyone for reviewing this one
quickly.
-dain
On Aug 9, 2006, at 9:28 AM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
With votes from Jeff, Jencks and Matt, I am going to committ this
patch today, so please let me know if you're going to commit
something significant so I can
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2277?page=all ]
Dain Sundstrom closed GERONIMO-2277.
> Remove TransactionContextManager
>
>
> Key: GERONIMO-2277
> URL: http://issues.apache.
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-855?page=comments#action_36739 ]
Maxim Fateev commented on AMQ-855:
--
#1. I wasn't presize. Yes it holds references. But it doesn't really matter as
these references are locked to the particular su
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-855?page=comments#action_36738 ]
Vadim Pesochinskiy commented on AMQ-855:
#1. I thought that pending holds references, not messages. When message is
actually dispatched it will become unava
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XBEAN-33?page=comments#action_12427051 ]
David Blevins commented on XBEAN-33:
You can paste automatically with the swizzle-confluence library. See
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/SWIZZLE/Swizzle+Conf
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-855?page=comments#action_36737 ]
Maxim Fateev commented on AMQ-855:
--
I think the failure scenario (slow consumer) is very common one and should be
supported by ActiveMQ. The root cause of the prob
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-855?page=all ]
Maxim Fateev reopened AMQ-855:
--
> Add support for prefetchSize = 0
>
>
> Key: AMQ-855
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-855?page=comments#action_36736 ]
Vadim Pesochinskiy commented on AMQ-855:
> e.g. if we did implement prefetch of zero - which means don't deliver a
> message to a consumer at all -
> unles
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-521?page=comments#action_36735 ]
Guillaume Nodet commented on SM-521:
I'd like non lightweight components to be able to have throttling properties
configured as well.
In xbean, the tag only ide
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2248?page=comments#action_12427040
]
Joe Bohn commented on GERONIMO-2248:
I agree with Matt that we should at least print the stack trace for the should
not occur scenario.
I also agree with
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XBEAN-36?page=comments#action_12427039 ]
Hiram Chirino commented on XBEAN-36:
good catch. I'll fix it in a jiffy.
> [RTC] Support annotating properties with the ProperyEditor that should be
> used whe
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2248?page=comments#action_12427038
]
Aaron Mulder commented on GERONIMO-2248:
I'm not real happy with this:
* It puts data to the right of commands, where usually commands are on the far
Sounds good.
--kevan
On Aug 9, 2006, at 3:02 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Looks like the testing of OpenEJB is good. I'd like to go ahead
with the tagging and bagging of OEJB 2.1.1. If there are no
objections I'll update branches/v2_1_1 to be 2.1.1 and then move it
to tags.
Objections?
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2305?page=all ]
Chris Herborth updated GERONIMO-2305:
-
Attachment: devSignup.war
The first WAR I uploaded had a couple of errors; thanks to Matthias for
pointing them out.
This is the fixed WAR file,
On Aug 9, 2006, at 12:02 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Looks like the testing of OpenEJB is good. I'd like to go ahead
with the tagging and bagging of OEJB 2.1.1. If there are no
objections I'll update branches/v2_1_1 to be 2.1.1 and then move it
to tags.
Great! Thanks for doing the release
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2305?page=comments#action_12427020
]
Matthias Weßendorf commented on GERONIMO-2305:
--
that example is not running in tomcat (not tested geronimo), because wrong
web.xml and wrong pages
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2169?page=all ]
Matt Hogstrom reassigned GERONIMO-2169:
---
Assignee: Matt Hogstrom (was: Kevan Miller)
> Once tagged, the m:co goal of tags/1.1.1 should checkout the corresponding
> tagged version of
So far there have been no negative reponses, and several PMC +1s
Can we start an official vote and then plan for the removal of m1?
--jason
On Aug 9, 2006, at 1:24 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
+1
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
I propose we remove the m1 build. It has been broken for several
days now
I've never used the commons daemon stuff, but everyone I know uses
jsw, so I think it is the obvious choice.
-dain
On Aug 9, 2006, at 12:50 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
I guess :-P
Well, lemme know what you guys end up using, cause we will do the
same for Geronimo.
--jason
On Aug 9, 2006,
+1
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
I propose we remove the m1 build. It has been broken for several days
now and no one has noticed. Here is my vote:
+1 to remove the m1 build
-dain
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2269?page=all ]
Matt Hogstrom closed GERONIMO-2269.
---
Fix Version/s: 1.1.2
1.2
Resolution: Fixed
Sending
1.1.1/modules/kernel/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/kernel/config/Si
Its probably important to note that if the TCK passes against an m1
build of 1.2, that does not mean that it will also pass against an m2
build.
So, I don't see any reason to keep m1 around anymore.
* * *
Kevan, what needs to be done to get the TCK runnable against the m2
build of 1.2?
On 8/9/06, Komandur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I read the link, reread the thread & I misunderstood the prefetch feature ...
the broker is pushing messages into the clientside pre-fetch buffers upto
the limit.
Here are some ideas, let me know what you think ...
1. can we use an 'elastic prefe
It definitely impacts aspects of TCK. Agreed that it's important that
we hear from the people who are going to get those aspects of the TCK
working... ;-)
At this point, I don't see any harm in dropping m1. It's not going to
add any additional work and will drive our adoption of m2...
--k
I guess :-P
Well, lemme know what you guys end up using, cause we will do the
same for Geronimo.
--jason
On Aug 9, 2006, at 12:40 PM, James Strachan wrote:
On 8/9/06, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Both of these look like then use natives... which I don't really
understand. For
I read the link, reread the thread & I misunderstood the prefetch feature ...
the broker is pushing messages into the clientside pre-fetch buffers upto
the limit.
Here are some ideas, let me know what you think ...
1. can we use an 'elastic prefetch' buffer based on a sliding window (like
in T
Sounds good to me.
Thanks,
Aaorn
On 8/9/06, Matt Hogstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Looks like the testing of OpenEJB is good. I'd like to go ahead with the
tagging and bagging of
OEJB 2.1.1. If there are no objections I'll update branches/v2_1_1 to be 2.1.1
and then move it to
tags.
On 8/9/06, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Both of these look like then use natives... which I don't really
understand. For windows... sure, but do they need natives for POSIX
systems?
Yes - they are used to do things like monitor, kill and restart JVMs
if they hang up etc.
--
James
Both of these look like then use natives... which I don't really
understand. For windows... sure, but do they need natives for POSIX
systems?
--jason
On Aug 9, 2006, at 4:41 AM, James Strachan wrote:
Anyone have any experience of these 2 solutions to know which one is
the best to use whe
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2305?page=all ]
Chris Herborth updated GERONIMO-2305:
-
Attachment: devSignup.war
Install via Geronimo console, runs at /devSignup and is pretty trivial.
signup.jsp is the root document, and you can ign
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2264?page=all ]
Matt Hogstrom closed GERONIMO-2264.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Branch was completed and now entering re-entry.
> Created branches/1.1.1 to start release process
>
geronimo.kernel.classloader.JarFileUrlStreamHandler fails with Trinidad
---
Key: GERONIMO-2305
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2305
Project: Geronimo
Issu
Well, you got me. Given that so many people are heavily into Maven I have to admit ignorance in
there. I think Anita had made a comment that she was reusing existing Geronimo code and that you
were using something from Plexus.
Not everyone has that same mighty mass of knowledge you take for g
Thanks for the reply James.
Reading AMQ-855 and this thread, it seemed like messages were stuck in
prefetch buffers
when the associated consumer behaved.
Would you mind some clarification to confirm what I am suggesting is what
is happening :-)
1 When are the messages actually moved to pr
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1563?page=comments#action_12427010
]
Jeff Genender commented on GERONIMO-1563:
-
+1...same comment as Matt Hogstrom.
> [RTC] Make the JACC implementation pluggable
> ---
Yes...+1I have changed my practice and place a comment in the JIRA.
I think I voted before changing my practice ;-)
David Jencks wrote:
> AFAICT it's not possible to find out from jira when votes on issues were
> done, nor do they get comments. Therefore I think we need to ask PMC
> members
On Aug 9, 2006, at 8:04 AM, anita kulshreshtha wrote:
The patch on July 27th was for m2migration and it is clearly written.
Where is it? I keep getting lost in all of the patches.
--jason
On Aug 9, 2006, at 8:49 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Also, it sounds like some of the changes are preferences based on
style. It would be a fair debate as to one should use Plexus or
Geronimo infrastructure for the file delete activity.
Are you kidding me? Maven2 is built upon Plexus... Maven2
Looks like the testing of OpenEJB is good. I'd like to go ahead with the tagging and bagging of
OEJB 2.1.1. If there are no objections I'll update branches/v2_1_1 to be 2.1.1 and then move it to
tags.
Objections?
Agreed, the JIRA coting mechanism is auxilary and only to help show
in the review reports, but votes need to be make in comments.
The JIRA voting mechanism has no history, does not trigger an email
and includes no detail, so this must not be used as official votes.
--jason
On Aug 9, 2006,
This is definitely not happy in Safari :-( ... and when run from Camino it popped up a little dialog saying that the script was unresponsive, but telling it to continue eventually did display the UI.--jasonOn Aug 9, 2006, at 11:29 AM, Christopher Blythe wrote:All, Here's a first pass at a new Web
I generally vote and post a comment. I like the idea David.
David Jencks wrote:
AFAICT it's not possible to find out from jira when votes on issues were
done, nor do they get comments. Therefore I think we need to ask PMC
members voting on RTC issues to both vote and include a comment
explic
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XBEAN-31?page=comments#action_12427004 ]
David Jencks commented on XBEAN-31:
---
Matt's version of the patch applies and builds for me, I'll repeat my +1
> [RTC] it would be great if the m2 plugin would auto
Awesome :)
Unfortunately it doesn't do well with Safari but I hit it from a Windows IE box
and it looks great.
Your going to force us to start making some decisions on how to restructure the beast in terms of
the config and J2EE componentry going forward. Would you be ammenable to sending in
Thanks a lot!
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/soap-binding-sample-error-tf2079610.html#a5731560
Sent from the ServiceMix - Dev forum at Nabble.com.
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XBEAN-36?page=comments#action_12426997 ]
David Jencks commented on XBEAN-36:
---
I _think_ that some jdk 1.5 specific code was installed in this patch -- at
least new IllegalArgumentException(String, Throwab
All,Here's a first pass at a new Web 2.0, AJAX-based, Web
interface for DayTrader! Take a look at and let me know what you think:
http://porky.hogstrom.org:8080/dojo_trader/daytrader.htmlFYI - I highly suggest using Firefox or Mozzilla to view this. Also, thanks to Matt Hogstrom for his assistanc
AFAICT it's not possible to find out from jira when votes on issues
were done, nor do they get comments. Therefore I think we need to
ask PMC members voting on RTC issues to both vote and include a
comment explicitly indicating that they are voting +1 as an official
RTC vote.
In particul
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-850?page=comments#action_36734 ]
james strachan commented on AMQ-850:
Sridhar: I don't quite follow your suggestion. We kinda do what you suggest -
the broker maintains a record of how many mes
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-850?page=comments#action_36733 ]
james strachan commented on AMQ-850:
Vadim: agreed in the case where the consumer just never processes any messages
and the receive() method is never called. A
Continuing my previous posting ...
Also, note that message related accounting can happen in the central pool;
for example, any dispatched messages are marked appropriately in the message
meta-data (which consumer it was dispatched, timestamp etc). The dispatched
messages can go to the "back" of
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-850?page=comments#action_36732 ]
Sridhar Komandur commented on AMQ-850:
--
James/Hiram,
Here is another proposal for fixing this issue.
At a high level, we need break the coupling between the m
+1
-dain
On Aug 9, 2006, at 10:04 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
sounds good to me
Aaron Mulder wrote:
On 8/9/06, Matt Hogstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Starting it is fine but it does require some customization as
Aaron pointed out. Will the start be
graceful enough that users will know that
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1917?page=all ]
Matt Hogstrom updated GERONIMO-1917:
Fix Version/s: 1.1.2
1.2
(was: 1.1.1)
Affects Version/s: 1.1.1
1.1.2
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1716?page=all ]
Matt Hogstrom updated GERONIMO-1716:
Fix Version/s: 1.1.2
1.2
(was: 1.1.1)
> Add usage of SimpleEncryption to PropertiesFileLoginModule and Admi
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2015?page=comments#action_12426986
]
Matt Hogstrom commented on GERONIMO-2015:
-
-1 for the 1.x line of the server. Users would most likely be expecting some
compatibility from previous ve
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2248?page=comments#action_12426984
]
Matt Hogstrom commented on GERONIMO-2248:
-
I think this is fine for inclusion in 1.1.2. Although it is an "improvement"
it improves server usability.
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XBEAN-19?page=comments#action_12426983 ]
Matt Hogstrom commented on XBEAN-19:
+1...applied and tested. Need one more vote.
> [RTC] Enable inverse classloading with the classpath element
> -
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XBEAN-31?page=all ]
Matt Hogstrom reopened XBEAN-31:
Resetting vote.
> [RTC] it would be great if the m2 plugin would automatically add the XSD and
> .xsd.html files as artifacts into the build
>
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XBEAN-31?page=all ]
Matt Hogstrom updated XBEAN-31:
---
Attachment: XBEAN-31.matt.diff
> [RTC] it would be great if the m2 plugin would automatically add the XSD and
> .xsd.html files as artifacts into the build
> -
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XBEAN-31?page=comments#action_12426977 ]
Matt Hogstrom commented on XBEAN-31:
Guillaume, I tried the patch and it didn't work. Since it was fairly small I
went ahead and manually applied the changes.
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-521?page=comments#action_36731 ]
Ramon Buckland commented on SM-521:
---
for Component throttling, this is handling the ConfigMBeanImpl.
Every component registered with the JBIContainer will get their
Yay!
On Aug 9, 2006, at 9:28 AM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
With votes from Jeff, Jencks and Matt, I am going to committ this
patch today, so please let me know if you're going to commit
something significant so I can avoid conflicts :)
-dain
On Aug 7, 2006, at 4:07 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-855?page=comments#action_36730 ]
Vadim Pesochinskiy commented on AMQ-855:
James & Hiram,
I understand that you are trying to keep the scope of AMQ in check and I
appreciate this as I belie
sounds good to me
Aaron Mulder wrote:
On 8/9/06, Matt Hogstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Starting it is fine but it does require some customization as Aaron
pointed out. Will the start be
graceful enough that users will know that they need to customize it?
Perhaps a WARNING message
issues
These are several commands.
Try
ant setup
then
servicemix servicemix.xml
On 8/9/06, ajayk_goel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sorry if it is duplicate post, I did try searching for this error
though...
I am new to servicemix and am trying to run the soap-binding sample
provided
by 3.0 M2.
Wh
On 8/9/06, Matt Hogstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Starting it is fine but it does require some customization as Aaron pointed
out. Will the start be
graceful enough that users will know that they need to customize it? Perhaps a
WARNING message
issues at startup if it hasn't been configured
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Starting it is fine but it does require some customization as Aaron
pointed out. Will the start be graceful enough that users will know
that they need to customize it? Perhaps a WARNING message issues at
startup if it hasn't been configured would be nice.
Rick McGuire w
using the new ClientFactory for the JSR181 proxy inside jsr181 service unit
---
Key: SM-528
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-528
Project: ServiceMix
Iss
With votes from Jeff, Jencks and Matt, I am going to committ this
patch today, so please let me know if you're going to commit
something significant so I can avoid conflicts :)
-dain
On Aug 7, 2006, at 4:07 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
Ok all fixed. Jason fixed the logging issue, and the othe
Sorry if it is duplicate post, I did try searching for this error though...
I am new to servicemix and am trying to run the soap-binding sample provided
by 3.0 M2.
When I try to run the xml file by saying (servicemix is in my path)
"ant setup servicemix servicemix.xml"
I get an error
"Target `
Instead of hand carving the version changes through the files.
It could be more elegantly written as
find . -type f -name '*.xml' -or -name '*.properties' | xargs -l1 grep
-l SNAPSHOT | xargs -l1 perl -pi.backup -s
's/(3.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT|3.0-SNAPSHOT|1.0-i
ncubating-SNAPSHOT)/3.0-2006-0
I get the sense that both of you are a bit frustrated. The transition to the new RTC development
model has been challenging for all. The PMC has not kept up with the number of reviews and that has
allowed the codebase to drift while patches then get stale.
Recently we've made several steps fo
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-52?page=all ]
Sachin Patel reassigned GERONIMODEVTOOLS-52:
Assignee: Sachin Patel
> Move away from generic server framework
> ---
>
>
1 - 100 of 163 matches
Mail list logo
