[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-2349) jta 1.1 support with container manager jpa support in transaction module

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2349?page=comments#action_12433570 ] Gianny Damour commented on GERONIMO-2349: - I applied v5, which contains the changes against the transaction module. +1 to have it applied. > jta 1.1 s

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-2248) Applications portlets: List Parent and Child components against each component

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2248?page=comments#action_12433565 ] Gianny Damour commented on GERONIMO-2248: - Thanks for this patch. I think that this is a great add-on. I also think that if you can add a new screen to

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-2382) Webservers portlet - Form field validation using javascript

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2382?page=all ] Gianny Damour updated GERONIMO-2382: Attachment: GERONIMO-2382-v2.patch m2 layout > Webservers portlet - Form field validation using javascript > ---

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-2378) Problems in JavaScript validation code forms.js

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2378?page=all ] Gianny Damour updated GERONIMO-2378: Attachment: GERONIMO-2378-v2.patch m2 layout > Problems in JavaScript validation code forms.js > --- > >

Re: When has the server started?

> On 9/1/06, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> I also peeked at the server's JMX tree via jconsole and I don't see >> any attribute or operation that matches up to "kernelFullyStarted". >> There is also a strange "null" element of the tree, but I will leave >> that for another d

Re: GERONIMO-2390 ---> RTC --> PING!

Worked for me earlier Gianny. At least I got Jeff's patch and got it applied. Is that what you meant? Gianny Damour wrote: On 09/09/2006, at 2:30 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: Third one tonight...must be important :) Ibiblio is down :( Cool... Also, it seems that JIRA attachments are not workin

Re: [jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-2382) Webservers portlet - Form field validation using javascript

Sorry, I was doing a JIRA test as it seems that I cannot attach a file to 2282. I reviewed 2381, 2382 and 2248 and changed them to comply to the new m2 project layout. Unfortunately, I cannot attach the new files... I really like 2248 and I think that if you can add a new screen to displa

Re: GERONIMO-2390 ---> RTC --> PING!

On 09/09/2006, at 2:30 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: Third one tonight...must be important :) Ibiblio is down :( Cool... Also, it seems that JIRA attachments are not working for me. Can someone confirm? Thanks, Gianny Jeff Genender wrote: Little reminder ;-) Jeff -- Matt Hogstrom

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-2379) Security Realms portlet - form field validation using javascript

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2379?page=comments#action_12433560 ] Paul McMahan commented on GERONIMO-2379: Thanks for providing an updated patch. Turns out some of the problems I was seeing were because I needed to a

Re: GERONIMO-2390 ---> RTC --> PING!

Third one tonight...must be important :) Ibiblio is down :( Jeff Genender wrote: Little reminder ;-) Jeff -- Matt Hogstrom

GERONIMO-2390 ---> RTC --> PING!

Little reminder ;-) Jeff

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-2381) DB Manager portlet - Form field validation using javascript

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2381?page=comments#action_12433557 ] Vamsavardhana Reddy commented on GERONIMO-2381: --- Paul, Thanks for reviewing the patch. I have quickly created these patches reusing the javasci

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-2382) Webservers portlet - Form field validation using javascript

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2382?page=comments#action_12433556 ] Paul McMahan commented on GERONIMO-2382: OK thanks Vamsi -- now I see the link to GERONIMO-2378 which addresses the empty numeric fields. > Webservers

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-903) Update Log4J usage from 1.2.8 to latest maintenance version of 1.2.13

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-903?page=comments#action_12433553 ] Matt Hogstrom commented on GERONIMO-903: I think we should upgrade. Is this fixing a specific issue Donald or are you just looking at getting current?

Re: [jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-2382) Webservers portlet - Form field validation using javascript

??  Did not get you Gianny. VamsiOn 9/9/06, Gianny Damour (JIRA) wrote: [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2382?page=comments#action_12433550 ]Gianny Damour commented on GERONIMO-2382: -test> Webservers portlet - Fo

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-2380) Keystores portlet - Form field validation using javascript

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2380?page=comments#action_12433551 ] Vamsavardhana Reddy commented on GERONIMO-2380: --- Paul, thanks for reviewing the patch. "Number of days valid" chedking for emptiness is addresse

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-2382) Webservers portlet - Form field validation using javascript

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2382?page=comments#action_12433550 ] Gianny Damour commented on GERONIMO-2382: - test > Webservers portlet - Form field validation using javascript > ---

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-2382) Webservers portlet - Form field validation using javascript

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2382?page=comments#action_12433549 ] Vamsavardhana Reddy commented on GERONIMO-2382: --- Please note that checking numeric fields for empty is addressed in the dependency JIRA GERONIMO-

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-2379) Security Realms portlet - form field validation using javascript

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2379?page=all ] Vamsavardhana Reddy updated GERONIMO-2379: -- Attachment: GERONIMO-2379-revised.patch GERONIMO-2379-revised.patch: Revised to account for 1. In MasterLoginModuleInfo.java the "xxx.b

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-2379) Security Realms portlet - form field validation using javascript

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2379?page=comments#action_12433547 ] Vamsavardhana Reddy commented on GERONIMO-2379: --- Please note that this JIRA has a dependency on "GERONIMO-2378 Problems in JavaScript validation

Re: [Poll] Next release?

First off Dain, thanks for pulling all the info together. I didn't realize how much stuff was in trunk right now. Now, to the topic at hand. Dain Sundstrom wrote: In an attempt to quantify our expectation about the next release from trunk, please rank the following items in importance to you:

[Poll] Next release?

In an attempt to quantify our expectation about the next release from trunk, please rank the following items in importance to you: [ ] Release Date [ ] Feature Set [ ] Release Name [ ] Certification

[Discussion] Are we done merging from branch/dead-1.2?

In the "Release Early, Release Often" thread David Jencks raised a few times that there are still commits to dead-1.2 that have not been merged into trunk. I may have missed them, but I haven't noticed any merges from dead-1.2 in a while. Should we consider anything left in 1.2 abandoned

[Summary] Release Early, Release Often

This has been a great discussion and a lot of important issues have been raised. We don't seem to have a consensus just yet, but I think we have made good progress toward one. I've snipped out the highlights of the discussion below: On Sep 6, 2006, at 12:40 PM, Joe Bohn wrote: I've heard

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-2390) Tomcat connectors missing several attributes

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2390?page=all ] Jeff Genender updated GERONIMO-2390: Issue Type: Improvement (was: Bug) Workflow: RTC Workflow (was: jira) > Tomcat connectors missing several attributes > --

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-2390) Tomcat connectors missing several attributes

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2390?page=all ] Jeff Genender updated GERONIMO-2390: Attachment: geronimo-2390.patch Patch attached > Tomcat connectors missing several attributes > > >

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-2390) Tomcat connectors missing several attributes

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2390?page=all ] Jeff Genender updated GERONIMO-2390: Assignee: Jeff Genender > Tomcat connectors missing several attributes > > > Key: GERONI

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-2390) Tomcat connectors missing several attributes

Tomcat connectors missing several attributes Key: GERONIMO-2390 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2390 Project: Geronimo Issue Type: Bug Security Level: public (Regular issu

Re: How do swing apps work?

On Sep 8, 2006, at 5:24 PM, David Blevins wrote: On Sep 8, 2006, at 4:51 PM, David Jencks wrote: I fiddled around a bit and got the daytrader streamer app client to work on trunk (except I might have broker the update timer). However, to do this I had to add code so the main method doesn't

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-903) Update Log4J usage from 1.2.8 to latest maintenance version of 1.2.13

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-903?page=comments#action_12433536 ] Gianny Damour commented on GERONIMO-903: Does this patch require RTC? It seems to be a rather harmless upgrade. > Update Log4J usage from 1.2.8 to lates

Re: How do swing apps work?

For standalone Swing apps, the Swing event-handling thread is a non-daemon thread so it doesn't shut down until you call System.exit. There's a special option on JFrame to cause a VM shutdown if you click the X, but that isn't the default behavior either. Thanks, Aaron On 9/8/06, David Jenck

Re: [WELCOME] Please welcome Joe Bohn as the newest member of the Geronimo PMC

Congratulations Joe! Gianny On 09/09/2006, at 12:51 AM, Sachin Patel wrote: The Apache Geronimo PMC would like to announce that Joe Bohn has accepted the invitation to join the Geronimo PMC. In addition to his technical contributions to Geronimo, we are extremely excited to have Joe assi

Re: How do swing apps work?

On Sep 8, 2006, at 4:51 PM, David Jencks wrote: I fiddled around a bit and got the daytrader streamer app client to work on trunk (except I might have broker the update timer). However, to do this I had to add code so the main method doesn't return until the app exits: otherwise it return

How do swing apps work?

I fiddled around a bit and got the daytrader streamer app client to work on trunk (except I might have broker the update timer). However, to do this I had to add code so the main method doesn't return until the app exits: otherwise it returns and our app client container shuts down the ker

Re: Resolving a GBean reference

On Sep 8, 2006, at 7:02 PM, Rick McGuire wrote: Dain Sundstrom wrote: I'm more confused now... is the ORB aware of the geronimo kernel? If not, what code is talking to the registry? Only the socket factory is aware of the geronimo kernel. This is a pluggable bit of code that is configured

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-2365) Upgrade Derby to 10.1.3.1

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2365?page=comments#action_12433530 ] David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-2365: You can leave out version info from a plan in which case it will use the most recent available. If you want t

Re: Resolving a GBean reference

This is starting to make more sense to me. Can you point me at the implementation we currently have for the sun orb? Also, what is the information the socket factory needs from the orb? -dain On Sep 8, 2006, at 4:02 PM, Rick McGuire wrote: Dain Sundstrom wrote: I'm more confused now... is

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-2389) App client container must avoid use of server-side configurations (modules) and needs individual spec jars

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2389?page=all ] David Jencks updated GERONIMO-2389: --- Attachment: GERONIMO-2389.patch patch extracted from a lot of other stuff that might fix the client problems. > App client container must avoid use of

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-2389) App client container must avoid use of server-side configurations (modules) and needs individual spec jars

App client container must avoid use of server-side configurations (modules) and needs individual spec jars -- Key: GERONIMO-2389 URL: http://issues.apache.org/

Re: Resolving a GBean reference

Dain Sundstrom wrote: I'm more confused now... is the ORB aware of the geronimo kernel? If not, what code is talking to the registry? Only the socket factory is aware of the geronimo kernel. This is a pluggable bit of code that is configured by specifying a special argument on ORB.init(). Bo

Re: Resolving a GBean reference

I'm more confused now... is the ORB aware of the geronimo kernel? If not, what code is talking to the registry? -dain On Sep 8, 2006, at 3:44 PM, Rick McGuire wrote: David Jencks wrote: I don't follow this at all. What gbean is creating the orb? Do I understand correctly that the ssl in

Re: Geronimo wiki

On 9/8/06, Hernan Cunico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi All, I just did a little reorg in the wiki front page in an attempt to minimize the scrolling. The content is now displayed in two columns, this should help to better visualize the content. Whow! It looks much better now. Such a small chan

Re: Resolving a GBean reference

David Jencks wrote: I don't follow this at all. What gbean is creating the orb? Do I understand correctly that the ssl info can be in either a CorbaBean or a CSSBean? Can these gbeans create the socket factory and whatever needs it get it from them using a reference from that "X" bean to the

Re: Resolving a GBean reference

I don't follow this at all. What gbean is creating the orb? Do I understand correctly that the ssl info can be in either a CorbaBean or a CSSBean? Can these gbeans create the socket factory and whatever needs it get it from them using a reference from that "X" bean to the CorbaBean/CSSBe

[jira] Created: (SM-570) HTTP connector can blow up while trying to report a problem

HTTP connector can blow up while trying to report a problem --- Key: SM-570 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-570 Project: ServiceMix Issue Type: Bug Component

Re: [WELCOME] Please welcome Joe Bohn as the newest member of the Geronimo PMC

Congrats Joe -dain On Sep 8, 2006, at 7:51 AM, Sachin Patel wrote: The Apache Geronimo PMC would like to announce that Joe Bohn has accepted the invitation to join the Geronimo PMC. In addition to his technical contributions to Geronimo, we are extremely excited to have Joe assisting wit

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-2379) Security Realms portlet - form field validation using javascript

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2379?page=comments#action_12433498 ] Paul McMahan commented on GERONIMO-2379: Comments on the patch: General comment is that many of the prompts use the forms internal variable name inste

OpenEJB Version 2.1.1 is Released

All, I have released OpenEJB 2.1.1. Note that when checked out from tags it will not build correctly until Geronimo and the specs are released which will be next week. If you want to build manually then you'll need to adjust the jacc specification version and the geronimo-schema jar to the ap

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-2382) Webservers portlet - Form field validation using javascript

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2382?page=comments#action_12433477 ] Paul McMahan commented on GERONIMO-2382: Comments on the patch: The fields that are checked for being numeric should also be checked for being non-empt

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-2381) DB Manager portlet - Form field validation using javascript

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2381?page=comments#action_12433475 ] Paul McMahan commented on GERONIMO-2381: Vamsi, comments on this patch: Instead of prompting the user with the form's internal variable names it would

Re: [VOTE] Relase 4.1 of the ActiveMQ maven plugins

+1 On 9/8/06, Rob Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: +1 On 8 Sep 2006, at 14:53, Hiram Chirino wrote: > This is the first independently released version of the ActiveMQ maven > plugins. These are the maven plugins that the ActiveMQ build requires > to build. > > You can checkout the binary bui

Maven plugin exception

FYI I started to get following exception when I run compile. mvn -Dmaven.test.skip=true compile [INFO] Extracting: d:\activemq\src\trunk\activemq-jaas\target\classes: to d:\activemq\src\trunk\assembly\target\classes org.apache.maven.plugin.MojoExecutionException: Error unpacking file: d:\act

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-2380) Keystores portlet - Form field validation using javascript

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2380?page=comments#action_12433473 ] Paul McMahan commented on GERONIMO-2380: Vamsi, some comments on the patch. Create Private Key portlet: "Number of days valid" is checked for being num

Re: [VOTE] Relase 4.1 of the ActiveMQ maven plugins

+1 On 8 Sep 2006, at 14:53, Hiram Chirino wrote: This is the first independently released version of the ActiveMQ maven plugins. These are the maven plugins that the ActiveMQ build requires to build. You can checkout the binary build here: http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repositor

Releasing OpenEJB 2.1.1

All, I'm in the process of releasing OpenEJB 2.1.1 this afternoon. TCK has passed and all the issues related to Geronimo 1.1.1 have been packaging / documentation. In order to not hold OpenEJB hostage any longer I'm going to go ahead and complete the release which will make the release proc

Re: [VOTE] 1.1.1-rc2 Release

You are correct about the jacc jar. The binary distribution was built correctly. I fat fingered the jars when copying on my local machine. I also have updated the RELEASE-NOTES-1.1.1.txt per Jan's comments. The j2ee* schema dirs in modules/j2ee-schema to address the 0 length files pointed out

Re: Resolving a GBean reference

I'm not sure I totally follow this, but is sounds like a classic circular dependency problem. To start with using KernelRegistry.getSingleKernel() or looking up references via getGBean are both highly discouraged. It is better use either a GBean reference or to pass a reference to 'this' t

Geronimo wiki

Hi All, I just did a little reorg in the wiki front page in an attempt to minimize the scrolling. The content is now displayed in two columns, this should help to better visualize the content. Cheers! Hernan

Re: [VOTE] ServiceMix 3.0-incubating

It looks good but there are a few files that don't have a license header on them.. Most of them don't need a header but there are a few .java files that do seem like they need it. Here's all the files without a header: ./apache-servicemix/src/main/release/conf/keystore.jks ./apache-servicemix/s

Re: OpenEJB 2 build failures (was Re: openejb-builder test failure)

On Sep 8, 2006, at 6:24 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote: On 9/8/06, Sergey Elin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: No, it was well known error with undefined getName() I don't think so. I'm seeing two build failures pertaining to the OpenEJB 2 build: * java.lang.NoSuchMethodException: org.openejb.deploy

Re: [VOTE] Relase 4.1 of the ActiveMQ maven plugins

+1 On 9/8/06, Hiram Chirino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: This is the first independently released version of the ActiveMQ maven plugins. These are the maven plugins that the ActiveMQ build requires to build. You can checkout the binary build here: http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-re

Re: [WELCOME] Please welcome Joe Bohn as the newest member of the Geronimo PMC

Congratulations! =)2006/9/8, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Congratulations !On 9/8/06, Sachin Patel < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The Apache Geronimo PMC would like to announce that Joe Bohn has accepted the invitation to join the Geronimo PMC.  In addition to his technical contributions to G

Re: [WELCOME] Please welcome Joe Bohn as the newest member of the Geronimo PMC

Congratulations !On 9/8/06, Sachin Patel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The Apache Geronimo PMC would like to announce that Joe Bohn has accepted the invitation to join the Geronimo PMC.  In addition to his technical contributions to Geronimo, we are extremely excited to have Joe assisting with project

Re: [WELCOME] Please welcome Joe Bohn as the newest member of the Geronimo PMC

Congrats Joe!--kevanOn Sep 8, 2006, at 10:51 AM, Sachin Patel wrote:The Apache Geronimo PMC would like to announce that Joe Bohn has accepted the invitation to join the Geronimo PMC.  In addition to his technical contributions to Geronimo, we are extremely excited to have Joe assisting with project

Re: JIRA Best Practices

OK that's what I suspected. So I think that means that in order to avoid confusion we should stick to refining the existing global definitions and be careful not to conflict. The stuff already on the wiki page looks good, maybe we should replace "Classification" with "Issue Type". My main conce

Re: openejb-builder test failure

Jacek Laskowski wrote: On 9/8/06, Joe Bohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The pieces are all starting to come together. Great! ;-) I was first getting the error that Sergey referenced and which I first referenced in this post: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=geronimo-dev&m=115653241007061&w=2

Re: Release Early, Release Often

Why would we make a 1.1.2 from trunk? That seems rather odd todo since 1.1.x is on its own branch. If we did, then we would have another huge merge to perform. Just release it as 1.2 --jason -Original Message- From: "Paul McMahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 18:11

Re: JIRA Best Practices

Unlikly as that would mean changing the source for JIRA and that page is global to all projects, not just for G projects. --jason -Original Message- From: "Paul McMahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 18:55:46 To:dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: JIRA Best Practices

[jira] Assigned: (GERONIMO-2236) keystore portlet - providing a null or incorrect password on edit unlock can only be recovered with server recycle

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2236?page=all ] Vamsavardhana Reddy reassigned GERONIMO-2236: - Assignee: Vamsavardhana Reddy > keystore portlet - providing a null or incorrect password on edit unlock can > only be recovered w

Re: OpenEJB 2 build failures (was Re: openejb-builder test failure)

On 9/8/06, Joe Bohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Jacek, I posted this in the other thread but will post it here as well. I hit both of these errors. I was seeing the getName() error (which was why I proposed skipping the tests). However, when I moved my repository from "C:\Documents and Setting

Re: [WELCOME] Please welcome Joe Bohn as the newest member of the Geronimo PMC

On 9/8/06, Sachin Patel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The Apache Geronimo PMC would like to announce that Joe Bohn has accepted the invitation to join the Geronimo PMC. In addition to his technical contributions to Geronimo, we are extremely excited to have Joe assisting with project oversight. P

Re: openejb-builder test failure

On 9/8/06, Joe Bohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The pieces are all starting to come together. Great! ;-) I was first getting the error that Sergey referenced and which I first referenced in this post: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=geronimo-dev&m=115653241007061&w=2 So was I. I was actual

Re: [WELCOME] Please welcome Joe Bohn as the newest member of the Geronimo PMC

Congratulations Joe! Sachin Patel wrote: The Apache Geronimo PMC would like to announce that Joe Bohn has accepted the invitation to join the Geronimo PMC. In addition to his technical contributions to Geronimo, we are extremely excited to have Joe assisting with project oversight. Please c

Re: [VOTE] Relase 4.1 of the ActiveMQ maven plugins

Do an activemq build with then. gram plugin is used to generate openwire marshallers... the other is used to buil the uber jar. On 9/8/06, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Is there any way we can test those plugins ? On 9/8/06, Hiram Chirino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > This is the

Re: [WELCOME] Please welcome Joe Bohn as the newest member of the Geronimo PMC

Way to go Joe, congrats!!! Cheers! Hernan Sachin Patel wrote: The Apache Geronimo PMC would like to announce that Joe Bohn has accepted the invitation to join the Geronimo PMC. In addition to his technical contributions to Geronimo, we are extremely excited to have Joe assisting with project

RE: Issues found when load tested servicemix

I have upgraded to Servicemix 3.0 and load tested it again by deploying Servicemix on Weblogic 8.1 and Geronimo 1.0 app servers. The situation seems to be improved but the overall problem still persists. For #4 in my mail below, servicemix 2.0.2 used to get stuck for around 30 transactions. But n

[jira] Resolved: (AMQ-855) Add support for prefetchSize = 0

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-855?page=all ] Hiram Chirino resolved AMQ-855. --- Resolution: Fixed patches applied.. Thanks Vadim! > Add support for prefetchSize = 0 > > > Key: AMQ-855 >

Re: OpenEJB 2 build failures (was Re: openejb-builder test failure)

Jacek, I posted this in the other thread but will post it here as well. I hit both of these errors. I was seeing the getName() error (which was why I proposed skipping the tests). However, when I moved my repository from "C:\Documents and Settings\bohn\.m2\repository" to "c:\m2repo" it got

Re: [WELCOME] Please welcome Joe Bohn as the newest member of the Geronimo PMC

Congratulations Joe! On 9/8/06, Sachin Patel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The Apache Geronimo PMC would like to announce that Joe Bohn has accepted the invitation to join the Geronimo PMC. In addition to his technical contributions to Geronimo, we are extremely excited to have Joe assisting with

Re: [WELCOME] Please welcome Joe Bohn as the newest member of the Geronimo PMC

Congrats Joe. VamsiOn 9/8/06, Sachin Patel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The Apache Geronimo PMC would like to announce that Joe Bohn has accepted the invitation to join the Geronimo PMC.  In addition to his technical contributions to Geronimo, we are extremely excited to have Joe assisting with proj

[WELCOME] Please welcome Joe Bohn as the newest member of the Geronimo PMC

The Apache Geronimo PMC would like to announce that Joe Bohn has accepted the invitation to join the Geronimo PMC.  In addition to his technical contributions to Geronimo, we are extremely excited to have Joe assisting with project oversight.Please congratulate Joe!The Apache Geronimo PMC-sachin

Re: [VOTE] Relase 4.1 of the ActiveMQ maven plugins

Is there any way we can test those plugins ? On 9/8/06, Hiram Chirino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: This is the first independently released version of the ActiveMQ maven plugins. These are the maven plugins that the ActiveMQ build requires to build. You can checkout the binary build here: http

[VOTE] ServiceMix 3.0-incubating

I have uploaded the 3.0-incubating release at http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository This means the distribution are available at http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository/org/apache/servicemix/apache-servicemix/3.0-incubating/apache-servicemix-3.0-incubating.tar.g

Re: JIRA Best Practices

Hi Dain, Should the following JIRA's be categorized as usability "Bugs"  rather than "Improvement?" GERONIMO-2388 JMS Server portlet improvement - field validation, reset button and show current task GERONIMO-2382 Webservers portlet - Form field validation using _javascript_ GERONIMO-2381 DB Ma

[jira] Updated: (SM-482) Missing jars in the BPE component

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-482?page=all ] Guillaume Nodet updated SM-482: --- Fix Version/s: 3.0.1 (was: 3.0) > Missing jars in the BPE component > - > > Key: SM-482 >

[jira] Updated: (SM-557) WSDL 1.1 message normalization for the servicemix-http component

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-557?page=all ] Guillaume Nodet updated SM-557: --- Fix Version/s: 3.0.1 (was: 3.0) > WSDL 1.1 message normalization for the servicemix-http component > -

[jira] Updated: (SM-546) Race condition present in servicemix-bpe module

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-546?page=all ] Guillaume Nodet updated SM-546: --- Fix Version/s: 3.0.1 (was: 3.0) > Race condition present in servicemix-bpe module > --- > >

[jira] Updated: (SM-556) CIMERO Eclipse plugin

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-556?page=all ] Guillaume Nodet updated SM-556: --- Fix Version/s: 3.0.1 (was: 3.0) > CIMERO Eclipse plugin > - > > Key: SM-556 > URL: htt

[jira] Updated: (SM-559) WSDL-First example in JBoss

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-559?page=all ] Guillaume Nodet updated SM-559: --- Fix Version/s: 3.0.1 (was: 3.0) > WSDL-First example in JBoss > --- > > Key: SM-559 >

[jira] Updated: (SM-565) Enhance the JSR181 Proxy so that it can proxy non WSDL publishing components

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-565?page=all ] Guillaume Nodet updated SM-565: --- Fix Version/s: 3.0.1 (was: 3.0) > Enhance the JSR181 Proxy so that it can proxy non WSDL publishing components > -

[jira] Assigned: (GERONIMO-1526) Allow module builders to support building configuraiton from non-j2ee structure.

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1526?page=all ] Tim McConnell reassigned GERONIMO-1526: --- Assignee: Tim McConnell > Allow module builders to support building configuraiton from non-j2ee > structure. > ---

Re: Release Early, Release Often

For Geronimo v1.1 we gathered a list with the user requirements and made it available in the wiki. I would propose we do the same for the next release (v1.2 for now) and include, along with the user requirements, the features we would like to have. Yup, that's the roadmap we are all talking ab

[VOTE] Relase 4.1 of the ActiveMQ maven plugins

This is the first independently released version of the ActiveMQ maven plugins. These are the maven plugins that the ActiveMQ build requires to build. You can checkout the binary build here: http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository/org/apache/activemq/ The release was built from t

Resolving a GBean reference

I think I've run into a classic chicken-and-egg problem trying to get yoko hooked into Geronimo. Let me recap the situation first, and the consensus solution we came up with earlier. To fully enable the SSL transport for Yoko, it's necessary to cause Yoko to load a socket factory object that

Re: Deployment type defects

Now that you ask and if you're interested how about the work I'm doing in the "sachin" branch GERONIMO-1526?On Sep 7, 2006, at 6:22 PM, Tim McConnell wrote:Hi, I'd like to start concentrating on some of the deployment defectssince I've spent a couple days trying to thoroughly understand the usecase

Re: openejb-builder test failure

The pieces are all starting to come together. I was first getting the error that Sergey referenced and which I first referenced in this post: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=geronimo-dev&m=115653241007061&w=2 I was actually proposing skipping the tests to get around that error because when I

OpenEJB 2 build failures (was Re: openejb-builder test failure)

On 9/8/06, Sergey Elin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: No, it was well known error with undefined getName() I don't think so. I'm seeing two build failures pertaining to the OpenEJB 2 build: * java.lang.NoSuchMethodException: org.openejb.deployment.DeploymentTestSuite.getName() - http://jira.codeh

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-2388) JMS Server portlet improvement - field validation, reset button and show current task

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2388?page=all ] Vamsavardhana Reddy updated GERONIMO-2388: -- Attachment: GERONIMO-2388.patch GERONIMO-2388.patch: Addresses 1, 2 and 3 from the issue description. > JMS Server portlet improvement

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-2388) JMS Server portlet improvement - field validation, reset button and show current task

JMS Server portlet improvement - field validation, reset button and show current task - Key: GERONIMO-2388 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2388 Pro

Re: ActiveMQ maven-plugins release

ok. I'll do this then. On 9/8/06, Rob Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm favour of doing this! - great idea! On 8 Sep 2006, at 00:02, Hiram Chirino wrote: > Looking at this thread: > http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--approve-the-m1-release-of-Trinidad%27s- > Maven-plugins-tf2180114.html > > It

  1   2   >