[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2333?page=comments#action_12433675
]
Chris Cardona commented on GERONIMO-2333:
-
Gianny,
Good thing you tried out the patch otherwise I wouldn't know that I forgot to
include the dojo rel
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2333?page=all ]
Chris Cardona updated GERONIMO-2333:
Attachment: jmxMgrPortlet-G1.1.1-New.patch
Updated patch which includes the Dojo related files. Thanks Gianny for pointing
this out. ;-)
> Add JMX
+1
I've kicked the tires and think the demons are gone; at least only
harmless ones remain.
On Sep 9, 2006, at 4:58 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
I have incorporated the latest feedback on 1.1.1-rc2. Items that
were identified as issues included:
* 0 length files in the modules/j2ee-schema/s
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2390?page=all ]
Vamsavardhana Reddy updated GERONIMO-2390:
--
Attachment: GERONIMO-2390-onemore.patch
GERONIMO-2390-onemore.patch: Addresses missing "server" and "strategy"
attributes.
> Tomcat co
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2390?page=comments#action_12433663
]
Vamsavardhana Reddy commented on GERONIMO-2390:
---
"server" and "strategy" attributes are still missing!!
http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-5.5-doc/c
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
*** Begin Proposal ***
* Any -1 votes need to be accompanied by a reason and a mutually
agreed upon solution to the issue raised.
I'm not sure how the "and a mutually agreed upon solution to the issue
raised" would work. I agree a -1 should be accompanied by a reason, bu
Congratulations Joe!
Regards,
John
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2333?page=comments#action_12433655
]
Gianny Damour commented on GERONIMO-2333:
-
Sorry for that Chris; my bad, I reverted some changes to console-framework (I
was testing other patches) hen
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
In an attempt to quantify our expectation about the next release from
trunk, please rank the following items in importance to you:
[3] Release Date
[2] Feature Set
[4] Release Name
[1] Certification
I agree with Kevan that we can't ship a release now that isn't certi
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2358?page=comments#action_12433646
]
David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-2358:
+1 go for it!
> Move java ee 5 specs into specs trunk
> -
>
>
I think the overwhelming need is that more than the author
understands and agrees with the main thrust of a major change. I
think that the apply-and-test RTC requirement we've been struggling
under has severely inhibited thorough review, but that's just my
experience.
I'm in favor of (3)
I've completed what I think is essential in my naming builder
refactoring, http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2383. I
think this or something similar is needed to get the jpa support in
and probably for easy partial integration of jee5 features.
I've described whats going on in
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2383?page=all ]
David Jencks updated GERONIMO-2383:
---
Attachment: GERONIMO-2383-v2.patch
GERONIMO-2383-openejb-v2.patch
I think this is ready to commit. Please vote.
Here's the idea: ther
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2392?page=all ]
David Jencks updated GERONIMO-2392:
---
Patch Info: [Patch Available]
> Too hard to tell why a gbean doesn't start
> --
>
> Key: GERONI
Too hard to tell why a gbean doesn't start
--
Key: GERONIMO-2392
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2392
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Improvement
Security Level: public (Regular
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2390?page=comments#action_12433635
]
David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-2390:
This is a bug fix and I recommend you assume that the votes imply +1 comments
that our RTC model is supposed t
Congrats joe!david jencksOn Sep 8, 2006, at 10:51 AM, Sachin Patel wrote:The Apache Geronimo PMC would like to announce that Joe Bohn has accepted the invitation to join the Geronimo PMC. In addition to his technical contributions to Geronimo, we are extremely excited to have Joe assisting with pr
Rick, can you update all_changes.log to indicate this if it isn't
already done?
Basically my opinion is that we can drop the dead-1.2 branch as soon
as all the items in all_changes.log are marked completed in some way.
Please, anyone who committed to the branch when it was trunk, review
a
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2389?page=all ]
David Jencks closed GERONIMO-2389.
--
Resolution: Fixed
fixed in rev. 441840
> App client container must avoid use of server-side configurations (modules)
> and needs individual spec jars
>
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-903?page=comments#action_12433633
]
David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-903:
---
+1 I tested this independently at home
IMO this is a bug fix
> Update Log4J usage from 1.2.8 to latest maintenan
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2365?page=comments#action_12433631
]
David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-2365:
I've tested this and, big surprise, it appears to cause no problems I can
discern.
+1
IMO this is a bug fix
Congrats Joe !!
Sachin Patel wrote:
The Apache Geronimo PMC would like to announce that Joe Bohn has
accepted the invitation to join the Geronimo PMC. In addition to his
technical contributions to Geronimo, we are extremely excited to have
Joe assisting with project oversight.
Please congra
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2333?page=comments#action_12433618
]
Chris Cardona commented on GERONIMO-2333:
-
Hi Gianny,
Thanks for checking out the patch. FYI, here's a list of the modified and added
files included i
On Sep 8, 2006, at 9:55 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
In an attempt to quantify our expectation about the next release
from trunk, please rank the following items in importance to you:
[3 ] Release Date
[2 ] Feature Set
[4 ] Release Name
[1] Certification
I don't view certification of a "relea
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
> At least I got Jeff's patch and got it applied.
Then vote! :-)
I have 2...need one more ;-)
Jeff
>
> Gianny Damour wrote:
>> On 09/09/2006, at 2:30 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
>>
>>> Third one tonight...must be important :)
>>>
>>> Ibiblio is down :(
>> Cool... Also, it s
On 09/09/2006, at 11:55 AM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
In an attempt to quantify our expectation about the next release
from trunk, please rank the following items in importance to you:
[ 2] Release Date
[ 1] Feature Set
[ 4] Release Name
[ 3] Certification
It seems that the baton on Release Ma
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
The javamail commits that were made to dead-1.2 were not directly merged
into 1.2 trunk because of the reorganization that was done with the
javamail code. That bit at least is done.
Rick
In the "Release Early, Release Often" thread David Jencks raised a few
times t
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
This is starting to make more sense to me. Can you point me at the
implementation we currently have for the sun orb? Also, what is the
information the socket factory needs from the orb?
The current implementation is
org.openejb.corba.sunorb.OrbSocketFactory. The property
Hi folks,
Sorry for OT question. I may repost this to legal, but I thought I
ask here first, as Geronimo just switched to Confluence.
Cayenne site is organized similar to Geronimo in that there are just
a few pages that comprise the static site, and the bulk of
documentation content is cr
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2248?page=comments#action_12433587
]
Vamsavardhana Reddy commented on GERONIMO-2248:
---
Loading configuration loads the configuration gbean data. It does not start
the configuration a
What' s your magic command ?
On 9/8/06, Hiram Chirino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It looks good but there are a few files that don't have a license
header on them.. Most of them don't need a header but there are a few
.java files that do seem like they need it. Here's all the files
without a h
I have incorporated the latest feedback on 1.1.1-rc2. Items that
were identified as issues included:
* 0 length files in the modules/j2ee-schema/src/j2ee*schema
directories. I have removed the those directories. The remaining
directories are still intact.
* Updated the RELEASE-NOTES-1.
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2333?page=comments#action_12433579
]
Gianny Damour commented on GERONIMO-2333:
-
Chris, I think that this patch is incomplete: the portlet configuration is
missing. The pictures look great
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2333?page=all ]
Chris Cardona updated GERONIMO-2333:
Attachment: jmxMgrPortlet-G1.1.1-2.jpg
jmxMgrPortlet-G1.1.1-3.jpg
> Add JMX Portlet
> ---
>
> Key: GERONI
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2333?page=all ]
Chris Cardona updated GERONIMO-2333:
Attachment: jmxMgrPortlet-G1.1.1.patch
dojo-0.3.1-bin.zip
jmxMgrPortlet-G1.1.1-1.jpg
Attached are the ff. files and t
Thanks for your reply. It seems that I can now upload files. Maybe
some network problems.
Thanks,
Gianny
On 09/09/2006, at 3:13 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Worked for me earlier Gianny. At least I got Jeff's patch and got
it applied. Is that what you meant?
Gianny Damour wrote:
On 09/09/2
36 matches
Mail list logo
