Good catch. OK. Will rename.
Cheers
Prasad
On 11/7/06, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If getGoalName() is going to return a class name, then I suggest that
getGoalName() be removed or renamed... as these are no longer what I
would expect a call to getGoalName() to return.
--jason
On
On Nov 7, 2006, at 5:54 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
The easier a build can be for new comers is desirable. I keep them
separate.
Does this mean you want openejb2 as an svn:externals? I think that
will considerably reduce the typical new users problems getting a
working build.
thanks
dav
I can see how this would benefit those who work on both openejb and
geronimo. But for folks who don't mind picking up openejb from the
snapshot repo would making this change cause top down builds and svn
operations such as checkout, update, and status to take much longer?
Best wishes,
Paul
On 1
The easier a build can be for new comers is desirable. I keep them
separate.
On Nov 7, 2006, at 8:41 PM, David Jencks wrote:
On Nov 7, 2006, at 4:58 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
Now that OpenEJB is at Apache, I don't see any reason why we don't
use svn:externals to include the openejb2 modules
On Nov 7, 2006, at 4:58 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
Now that OpenEJB is at Apache, I don't see any reason why we don't
use svn:externals to include the openejb2 modules directly into the
server/trunk tree.
Then we will have a "openejb" tree (peer to modules) and can build
everything at once.
Also it looks as if there are duplicate copyrights sometimes up to 3 on some of the files... I'll have to hunt these down. Would it be too much trouble to write me a script that shows me all files with "LICENSE-2.0" more then one time?On Nov 6, 2006, at 5:27 PM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:On 11/6/06, S
Need a release in a Maven2 repo.
--jason
On Nov 6, 2006, at 10:17 PM, Krishnakumar B wrote:
Hi Jason,
There is a 0.7-RC1 release available
http://www.apache.org/dist/ws/scout/0_7rc1/binaries/
Regards
Krish
On 11/3/06, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sweet! Is there a release (
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2280?page=all ]
Vamsavardhana Reddy closed GERONIMO-2280.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed in rev 472353 (branches\1.1) and rev 472359 (trunk).
> FileKeystoreInstance.getKeyManager() fails when there is mo
Now that OpenEJB is at Apache, I don't see any reason why we don't
use svn:externals to include the openejb2 modules directly into the
server/trunk tree.
Then we will have a "openejb" tree (peer to modules) and can build
everything at once... giving us a better chance of always keeping in
I hit this error while building geronimo-clustering-wadi module:
Path to dependency:
1)
org.apache.geronimo.modules:geronimo-clustering-wadi:jar:1.2-SNAPSHOT
2) org.codehaus.wadi:wadi-activecluster:jar:2.0M2-SNAPSHOT
3) incubator-activemq:activecluster:jar:4.0.1
it is coming
Invalid jbi.xml when using maven. no description element
-
Key: SM-738
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-738
Project: ServiceMix
Issue Type: Bug
Components: t
On Nov 7, 2006, at 1:50 PM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
On 11/7/06, Rodent of Unusual Size <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The implicit assumption there is that the 'developers' all have
the same interests. That's not necessarily how it works. If
there are some people who are interested in EE 5 but n
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1823?page=comments#action_12447982
]
Christopher M. Cardona commented on GERONIMO-1823:
--
Anybody got any issues / concerns in applying this patch for 1.2 release?
> Add Embedded L
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2075?page=all ]
Christopher M. Cardona closed GERONIMO-2075.
Resolution: Fixed
This was fixed on G 1.1 release.
> Error viewing "Web Access Log Viewer" portlet on G 1.1 with Tomcat
> --
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1277?page=all ]
Jason Dillon updated GERONIMO-1277:
---
Fix Version/s: 2.0
(was: 1.2)
> Change group-id to org.apache.geronimo
> --
>
>
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2401?page=all ]
Jason Dillon updated GERONIMO-2401:
---
Fix Version/s: 2.0
Affects Version/s: 1.2
> Upgrade commons-logging to 1.1
> --
>
> Key: GERONIMO-2
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2464?page=all ]
Jason Dillon updated GERONIMO-2464:
---
Priority: Minor (was: Critical)
> Remove overloaded maven scope from CAR plugin
> -
>
> Ke
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2401?page=all ]
Jason Dillon updated GERONIMO-2401:
---
Affects Version/s: 2.0
(was: 1.2)
> Upgrade commons-logging to 1.1
> --
>
> Key:
I think we need to release the reorganized/repom'd specs... that was
the general plan after cleaning them up was to make a release so we
have a set of consistent non-SNAPSHOT specs to work off of.
After this re-release, we can debate one version, or whatever. I'd
still like to see one vers
On Nov 7, 2006, at 9:12 AM, David Blevins wrote:
Before we release them can we mark the deps of these specs with
"provided"? Especially anything that's also in JEE
5 that requires JTA and anything that requires QName.
I think its fine for the JavaEE5 specs, but not sure how builds might
r
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2280?page=all ]
Vamsavardhana Reddy reassigned GERONIMO-2280:
-
Assignee: Vamsavardhana Reddy (was: Alan Cabrera)
> FileKeystoreInstance.getKeyManager() fails when there is more than one
> priv
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2275?page=all ]
Vamsavardhana Reddy closed GERONIMO-2275.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Applied the fix to trunk in rev 472317. Fix verified.
> login-domain-principal or realm-principal in default-principal
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2267?page=all ]
Vamsavardhana Reddy closed GERONIMO-2267.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Automatically fixed by GERONIMO-2294. Fix verified.
> RepeatedFailureLockoutLoginModule: Does not function
> --
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2294?page=all ]
Vamsavardhana Reddy closed GERONIMO-2294.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed in rev 472267 (branches\1.1) and rev 472291 (trunk).
> In security realm with multiple login modules, anything aft
On 11/7/06, Rodent of Unusual Size <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The implicit assumption there is that the 'developers' all have
the same interests. That's not necessarily how it works. If
there are some people who are interested in EE 5 but not in the
work on trunk, then they probably aren't con
If getGoalName() is going to return a class name, then I suggest that
getGoalName() be removed or renamed... as these are no longer what I
would expect a call to getGoalName() to return.
--jason
On Nov 7, 2006, at 8:39 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: prasad
Date: Tue Nov 7 08:39:33
We integrated with 4.1-SNAPSHOT specifically for this reason.
I still have not gotten any responses by to my query why 4.0x was added.
IMO, one or the other needs to be removed.
--jason
On Nov 7, 2006, at 1:04 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:
It seems that there are some problems with our dependencies on
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-976?page=all ]
Work on AMQ-976 started by Hiram Chirino.
> Abstract the Transport and TransportListener Interfaces so that the move
> around Objects instead of Command and Response objects.
> ---
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-976?page=all ]
Hiram Chirino resolved AMQ-976.
---
Resolution: Fixed
done.
> Abstract the Transport and TransportListener Interfaces so that the move
> around Objects instead of Command and Response objects.
>
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1026?page=all ]
Hiram Chirino resolved AMQ-1026.
Resolution: Fixed
> Sometimes a failover connection on reconnect produces a Client ID:x-1:1
> already connected error message.
> ---
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1026?page=comments#action_37362 ]
Hiram Chirino commented on AMQ-1026:
fixed in trunk rev 471837
> Sometimes a failover connection on reconnect produces a Client ID:x-1:1
> already connect
It seems that there are some problems with our dependencies on activemq
4.0.1 in trunk.
The first problem (with the activecluster jar) seems to be that the
maven-metadata.xml is not correct on
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository . It doesn't
include an entry for the 4.0.1 ve
Pure master/slave not replicating messages
--
Key: AMQ-1030
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1030
Project: ActiveMQ
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Broker
Affects Versions:
I am trying to set domain name for tomcat Mbeans to 'geronimo' instead
of 'Geronimo'. This will make tomcat MBeans, have names like
geronimo:... However as it is apparent from this trace that
tomcat does not like it. The server behaves normally except for this
trace. The problem is the
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2294?page=all ]
Vamsavardhana Reddy reassigned GERONIMO-2294:
-
Assignee: Vamsavardhana Reddy (was: Alan Cabrera)
> In security realm with multiple login modules, anything after the first is
>
Hi Matt,
Good to see that JIRAs targetted for 1.2 got attention finally.
IMHO, eliminating/fixing problems in the existing code is as important
as new features. Some of these JIRAs had patches waiting for a
long time. One less JIRA to worry about is always good :o). I
agree that all JIRAs can n
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2455?page=comments#action_12447915
]
Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMO-2455:
I created a Maven upload request for 3.0.2 --
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MAVENUPLOAD-1220
Once available
I see that Vamsi has been whacking away at the JIRAs in 1.2 but there
are currently over 200 JIRAs that are targetted at 1.2. After
talking with Dain I think we all agree that 1.2 will not get all
those JIRAs applied. I'm going to start moving the JIRAs in 1.2 and
reassign the target vers
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1017?page=all ]
Bernhard Wellhöfer updated AMQ-1017:
Attachment: mvn.log
The output of "mvn -Dmaven.test.skip=true -U clean install "
> Build of current trunk with Maven2 fails
> --
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1017?page=comments#action_37360 ]
Bernhard Wellhöfer commented on AMQ-1017:
-
I just did a fresh update to revision number 472216. I also removed all content
under ~/.m2/repository.
I still
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2548?page=all ]
Anita Kulshreshtha updated GERONIMO-2548:
-
Attachment: operations.jpg
The return type for all operations is java.lang.Object (please see
operations.jpg). We need to add return type
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2553?page=all ]
Vamsavardhana Reddy closed GERONIMO-2553.
-
Verified the fix.
> DatabasePools portlet - create new is broken
>
>
> Key: GERON
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2318?page=all ]
Vamsavardhana Reddy closed GERONIMO-2318.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed in rev 472214 (trunk).
> Database path validation not present
>
>
>
Just be aware that any of the changes that affect config.xml or other
non-Java files (keystores or whatever) probably need to be applied to
the TCK configuration as well.
Thanks,
Aaron
On 11/7/06, Aaron Mulder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 11/7/06, Paul McMahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-644?page=all ]
Albert Strasheim reopened AMQ-644:
--
I downloaded the latest apache-activemq-4.1-incubator-SNAPSHOT ZIP today and
I've noticed a few issues with the Java Service Wrapper for Windows
On 11/7/06, Paul McMahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
OK I'll take a look and start cranking through the list. Aaron please
raise a flag if you want me to hold off.
No, be my guest -- clearly I haven't gotten around to it. :)
Thanks,
Aaron
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2409?page=comments#action_12447899
]
David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-2409:
rev 472213 added a client_artifact_aliases.properties file in boilerplate-j2ee
so the client can swap stuff to
Found some good info tutorials on svk...http://www.bieberlabs.com/wordpress/svk-tutorials/ -sachin
You are welcome Paul. And thank you for taking care of
GERONIMO-2553 promptly. I have been addressing the JIRA's due to
be fixed in 1.1.2 and 1.1.x. and when I am trying to apply those
fixes to trunk, I am finding that some very basic things are failing in
the Admin Console. Admin Console needs
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1792?page=comments#action_12447888
]
Donald Woods commented on GERONIMO-1792:
Several of our WASCE users have requested the ability to use ANT scripting to
setup and deploy multiple server
Thanks Vamsi! I just realized that it is because of my modified
GBeanInfo. I reverted my changes and had a successful build.
Thanks
Anita
--- Vamsavardhana Reddy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a successful build with the latest source. May be you need to
> update
> openejb sources.
>
>
I have a successful build with the latest source. May be you need to update openejb sources.
--vamsiOn 11/7/06, anita kulshreshtha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,Is any one seeing the following error in rev 471980?thanksAnita
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2552?page=comments#action_12447881
]
Donald Woods commented on GERONIMO-2552:
Paul, I agree. The dojo.widget.Chart would be a good fit
> Remove SVG usage from Admin Console
> ---
Continue vote on..http://people.apache.org/dist/geronimo/eclipse/unstable/g-eclipse-plugin-1.2.0-v200611070107-deployable-RC4.zipAdditional copyrights were updated and a fix allowing server ping thread to have modifiable parameters needed to be added.On Nov 6, 2006, at 10:16 AM, Sachin Patel wrote:
On Nov 7, 2006, at 12:24 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
Upon closer inspection we never closed this issue. Sorry.
No problem. We've created a twisted path... Easy to see how we've
confused ourselves. Even odds that I was wrong... ;-)
--kevan
On Nov 7, 2006, at 12:00 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
We seem to have a process problem from what I can tell. I seem to
recall a few votes and no activity on this subject (perhaps someone
can help to correct my flawed view of the world).
Can the vote initiators summarize the previous votes an
David, I ported the change that externalizes the database driver info
into GBeans. Next I plan to look at the list of pending merges in
all_changes.log and move those forward if necessary. Then I'll take
an overall look at the console to see what else might have been left
behind or just needs s
Looking more closely it looks like paul has just ported the largest
such difference so this email can probably be ignored.
Sorry for the alarmism :-)
Many thanks to Paul for doing this port, it has been at the back of
my mind for months now.
thanks
david jencks
On Nov 7, 2006, at 9:24 AM,
On Nov 7, 2006, at 8:28 AM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
On Nov 7, 2006, at 5:52 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
On Nov 6, 2006, at 7:53 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
What do yo think of releasing the 1.4 specs (v1.2) included with
our server? After a quick inspection of the specs we have in
trunk, I think
The database pool portlet code is dramatically different and better
in the 1.1 branch than in trunk. I've been hoping Aaron (original
author of the improvements) would find some time to port these but I
see some changes going into trunk that do not look like a forward port.
Does anyone ha
On Nov 7, 2006, at 11:28 AM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
Are you kidding me? You want to open this up for discussion again
just as we were going to finally make some progress and hopefully
put this to bed. The reorganization we just did was to have one
version number per spec.
Well, as you
On 11/3/06, Dain Sundstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm not surprised. Can you merge them?
done
Also, Aaron has many merges
left in the dead-1.2 branch that may affect the console. You can see
them by running the following command in the server/trunk directory:
grep "Not Merged" all
Before we release them can we mark the deps of these specs with
"provided"? Especially anything that's also in JEE 5
that requires JTA and anything that requires QName.
Also, some people are using them outside of Geronimo and have been
having 1.3 compatibility issues with our specs (like O
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2553?page=all ]
Paul McMahan resolved GERONIMO-2553.
Resolution: Fixed
merged fix from rev 412804 plus added logic to look up tranql version number in
the repo if its not specified in the DatabaseDrive
We seem to have a process problem from what I can tell. I seem to
recall a few votes and no activity on this subject (perhaps someone
can help to correct my flawed view of the world).
Can the vote initiators summarize the previous votes and proposed
actions? I'm not sure why this is still
Hi,
Is any one seeing the following error in rev 471980?
thanks
Anita
... 16 more
Caused by: org.apache.geronimo.common.DeploymentException: Unable to
resolve reference "We
bServiceLinkTemplate" in gbean
org.apache.g
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David Jencks wrote:
>
> I think this is a bad idea: it breaks the model that anything in
> server/** is a complete server and provides no advantage I can see to
> working in the sandbox. I am strongly against this.
One advantage is that it forma
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
> Do you mean that we will have two active development trees?
Sounds like it.
> If so, I'm against that (-1). We have tried that in the past and it
> has never worked out for us. We split our developers when we need
> focus th
I got around this by deleting org.codehaus.wadi from my local repo and
doing an online build.
Paul
On 11/7/06, Vamsavardhana Reddy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Console output given below.
---
[INFO] Building Geronimo Clustering WADI
[INFO]task-segment: [install]
[INFO]
---
Console output given below.
---
[INFO] Building Geronimo Clustering WADI
[INFO] task-segment: [install]
[INFO] -
---
[INFO] [tools:require-java-version {execution: validate-java-version}]
[INFO] [tools:copy-legal-files {exec
On Nov 7, 2006, at 5:52 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
On Nov 6, 2006, at 7:53 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
What do yo think of releasing the 1.4 specs (v1.2) included with
our server? After a quick inspection of the specs we have in
trunk, I think they break down as follows.
I'd like to get the s
Hi Tim,
It looks like a good start!
It compiled great under OS X and the unit tests passed fine. The
integration tests bombed out though:
$ src/test-integration/activemq-test-integration
integration::durable::DurableTester::test.Starting activemqcms durable
test (sending 1000 messages per type
That line between unit and integration tests can be gray sometimes,
especially when you're unit testing things like the transport classes
which require feedback from the broker. I guess you'd have to make the
decision on a case-by-case basis, otherwise you'd be removing most of
our tests :).
One
On 11/7/06, Hiram Chirino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi folks!
I've been looking at the activemq-core test suite and it keep getting
bigger and bigger and takes longer and long to run. Ideally tests
should only take like 5 minutes to run. What do you think we should
do about it?
We are curren
Hi folks!
I've been looking at the activemq-core test suite and it keep getting
bigger and bigger and takes longer and long to run. Ideally tests
should only take like 5 minutes to run. What do you think we should
do about it?
We are currently forking each test case, so if we could avoid that
All,
Version 1.0 of the Apache Geronimo 1.1.1 Performance Report is
available at http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/Geronimo-1.1.1-
PerformanceReport.pdf. I have posted an article to The Server Side
to make people aware.
Thanks for all the feedback...now to get the Daytrader site updated.
TransportConnector get duplicated when used with JMX
Key: AMQ-1029
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1029
Project: ActiveMQ
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Broker
Matt,
I think this looks really good. Excellent analysis and explanations.
Just a few comments:
- Page numbers on each page would help with references ;-)
- Diagram numbers would also be helpful
- Would it be possible to get a brief (sentence or two) explanation of
each of the runtime par
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2553?page=comments#action_12447793
]
Vamsavardhana Reddy commented on GERONIMO-2553:
---
Thanks Paul. I started debugging it and tried to see if version number can be
omitted in the UR
On Nov 6, 2006, at 7:53 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
What do yo think of releasing the 1.4 specs (v1.2) included with
our server? After a quick inspection of the specs we have in
trunk, I think they break down as follows.
I'd like to get the stuff in the release category out ASAP and
maybe
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2553?page=comments#action_12447788
]
Paul McMahan commented on GERONIMO-2553:
This is broken due to rev 412804 not being applied to the 1.2 release. I am
working on a fix...
> DatabasePo
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2553?page=all ]
Paul McMahan reassigned GERONIMO-2553:
--
Assignee: Paul McMahan
> DatabasePools portlet - create new is broken
>
>
> Key: GER
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2318?page=comments#action_12447780
]
Vamsavardhana Reddy commented on GERONIMO-2318:
---
Fixed in rev 472080 (branches\1.1). Verification of fix to trunk is blocked by
GERONIMO-2553.
DatabasePools portlet - create new is broken
Key: GERONIMO-2553
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2553
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: public (Regular issu
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2318?page=all ]
Vamsavardhana Reddy reassigned GERONIMO-2318:
-
Assignee: Vamsavardhana Reddy
> Database path validation not present
>
>
> Key
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2318?page=comments#action_12447760
]
Vamsavardhana Reddy commented on GERONIMO-2318:
---
java.util.regex.Matcher.replaceAll() documentation says the following:
Note that backslashes (\\
Hi,
Sorry for this problem; I was not aware of it. This has now been fixed.
Thanks,
Gianny
On 07/11/2006, at 8:42 AM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
Can who ever maintains this please add an exclude to geronimo, or
even better mark it as optional in wadi?
-dain
On Nov 6, 2006, at 5:56 AM, Jeff Ge
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1592?page=all ]
Vamsavardhana Reddy closed GERONIMO-1592.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed in rev 472061 (trunk).
> Add NamedUPCredentialLoginModule to Console Realm Wizard
> --
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2552?page=comments#action_12447740
]
Jörg Heinicke commented on GERONIMO-2552:
-
I guess you are talking about SVG in browsers:
Then I just wonder why requiring Internet Explorer was an opti
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-732?page=comments#action_37356 ]
Horst Studer commented on SM-732:
-
Here it is black on white:
{code}
org.codehaus.xfire.XFireRuntimeException: Could not invoke service.. Nested
exception is org.co
Hi Matt,
It looks great work
I want to add one question and few more suggestions.
Question:
What is the formula of HPG? Is it a secret one? :-)
Suggestions:
1. Better we have comparison between IBM and Sun JVMs in this performances.
2. As database could you please consider inbuilt Apache
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1592?page=all ]
Vamsavardhana Reddy updated GERONIMO-1592:
--
Fix Version/s: 1.2
> Add NamedUPCredentialLoginModule to Console Realm Wizard
>
92 matches
Mail list logo
