JmsProviderEndpoint in-out mode need to be implemented
--
Key: SM-995
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-995
Project: ServiceMix
Issue Type: New Feature
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2846?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lin Sun reassigned GERONIMO-2846:
-
Assignee: Lin Sun
modified jax-ws calculator sample to work with CXF and Axis2
On 7/2/07, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to start a discussion on splitting the container and
components release cycles. What do people think about that ?
Should we keep the container and all the components in a single
release like we have done so far, or should we split
ServiceMix doesn't start correctly due to
javax.management.MalformedObjectNameException: Invalid ObjectName value type
[javax.xml.namespace.QName]: only ObjectName and String supported
On 7/6/07, Bruce Snyder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/2/07, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to start a discussion on splitting the container and
components release cycles. What do people think about that ?
Should we keep the container and all the components in a single
Looks like there is a problem with exporting plugins introduced by
the changes made recently in
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2757
The exported geronimo-plugin.xml does not contain a geronimo-
versions element and the plugin installer fails without it.
Also for that amq
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2784?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Woods reassigned GERONIMO-2784:
--
Assignee: Donald Woods
Samples cleanup
---
Key:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2344?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Woods updated GERONIMO-2344:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0-M7)
1.2
Setting Fix Version back to 1.2,
Paul, from my understanding, a geronimo-plugin.xml has to be manually
created by a user after exporting. I don't believe the export utility
automatically generates one. Please correct me if I'm mistaken on this,
though.
Ajay, those source repositories could have also been defined in the
I agree that we need to deal with these points somehow, but I think we
already have the problem: we do not ship Ode, yet the examples use it.
Maybe one solution would be to have extensions that could be
downloaded and installed easily in one click from the console. If
library versionning is
On Jul 6, 2007, at 11:19 AM, Jason Warner wrote:
Paul, from my understanding, a geronimo-plugin.xml has to be
manually created by a user after exporting. I don't believe the
export utility automatically generates one. Please correct me if
I'm mistaken on this, though.
When exporting a
Thanks for the info, it worked like a charm.
-Ajay
On 7/6/07, Paul McMahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jul 6, 2007, at 11:19 AM, Jason Warner wrote:
Paul, from my understanding, a geronimo-plugin.xml has to be
manually created by a user after exporting. I don't believe the
export
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3301?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Woods closed GERONIMO-3301.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Committed revision 553936 in sandbox
Fix typo in resources plugin.xml
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3301?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Woods reassigned GERONIMO-3301:
--
Assignee: Donald Woods (was: Jason Warner)
Fix typo in resources plugin.xml
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2757?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Woods reopened GERONIMO-2757:
A Console exported geronimo-plugin.xml does not contain a geronimo-versions
element and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3302?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Woods closed GERONIMO-3302.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Committed revision 553942 in sandbox.
j2g for persistence.xml
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2757?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12510733
]
Jason Warner commented on GERONIMO-2757:
I took a quick look through the export code and I see now why
On Jul 5, 2007, at 5:44 PM, David Jencks wrote:
On Jul 5, 2007, at 12:03 PM, David Blevins wrote:
How were we doing web services security before? Did it work for
EJBs too? (maybe that was the issue).
Web services security works and worked fine. AFAICT it's using
BASIC web
Hi everyone,
For those that are not subscribed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] there is a
discussion in progress about the current state of the Open Letter to
Sun that Apache put out in the public a few months ago.
The discussion is centered around Apache's participation in the Java
Community
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2757?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12510763
]
Donald Woods commented on GERONIMO-2757:
Cool! Thanks.
Enhance plugin schema to allow for multiple
Matt,
Actually I do believe a formal policy is being considered...and is under
discussion.
Jeff
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Hi everyone,
For those that are not subscribed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] there is a
discussion in progress about the current state of the Open Letter to Sun
that Apache put out
I second that. I'm also waiting for Activation spec to be released in
order to publish a new javamail snapshot (need latest javamail for
Axis2).
Jarek
On 7/4/07, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unless someone actually wants to try to fix the scm sections right
now (not it!) I think we
Just wanted to let folks know that I am doing some reformatting on jsp's.
I will keep reformatting commits separate from other changes
(or at least I'll try real hard to).
Jay
I guess everyone should look at the threads to make that determination :)
-- dims
On 7/6/07, Jeff Genender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matt,
Actually I do believe a formal policy is being considered...and is under
discussion.
Jeff
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Hi everyone,
For those that are not
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-jcp-open/
On 7/6/07, Davanum Srinivas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess everyone should look at the threads to make that determination :)
-- dims
On 7/6/07, Jeff Genender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matt,
Actually I do believe a formal policy is
HI
I am using Geronimo server for LifeRay product.
i have installed server and http://localhost:8080 is working
but http://localhost:8080/Console is not working .
Can u tell me why is it going on
Regards
Ashish Kanchan
Try a lower case console
Jeff
Ashish Kanchan wrote:
HI
I am using Geronimo server for LifeRay product.
i have installed server and http://localhost:8080 is working
but http://localhost:8080/Console is not working .
Can u tell me why is it going on
Regards
Ashish Kanchan
Hi Jacek,
Comments inline
On 7/5/07, Jacek Laskowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/4/07, Manu George [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes you are right. But if you see the Tuscany samples it supports SCA
modules that don't have sca-contribution.xml and just a .composite
file. So I was on two minds
To further let you all know,
I will be traveling for the next two weeks and will have spotty internet
access.
If my reformats cause any problems - please revert them.
Be back soon,
Jay
Jay D. McHugh wrote:
Just wanted to let folks know that I am doing some reformatting on jsp's.
I will
Comments in-line...
On 7/6/07, Manu George [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Jacek,
Comments inline
On 7/5/07, Jacek Laskowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/4/07, Manu George [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes you are right. But if you see the Tuscany samples it supports SCA
modules that don't have
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2385?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Woods resolved GERONIMO-2385.
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Bill Dudney (was: Donald Woods)
Committed revision
+1 on releasing these specs.
Lin
Jarek Gawor wrote:
I second that. I'm also waiting for Activation spec to be released in
order to publish a new javamail snapshot (need latest javamail for
Axis2).
Jarek
On 7/4/07, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unless someone actually wants to try to
32 matches
Mail list logo
