here is what I've done.
I setup a app server on a machine, say A. And I test it, it works fine.
In eclipse I install the server environment, apache Geronimo v2.0. The steps
are as follows.
1.windows-->preference-->server-->add
2.choose apache Geronimo v2.0, next
3.choose appli
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3570?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12540335
]
Vamsavardhana Reddy commented on GERONIMO-3570:
---
At revision: 592287
o Merging rev 592227 from tru
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3570?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12540332
]
Vamsavardhana Reddy commented on GERONIMO-3570:
---
At revision: 592284
o Merged rev 592223 from trunk.
Add internationalization capable support.
-
Key: GERONIMODEVTOOLS-249
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-249
Project: Geronimo-Devtools
Issue Type: Improvement
Compon
OpenEJB trunk at 592218
Geronimo Revision: 592223 built with tests included
See the full build-2100.log file at
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/trunk/20071105/build-2100.log
[INFO] [car:prepare-plan]
[INFO] Generated:
/home/prasad/geronimo/trunk/plugins/axis/axis/target/resources
Hi,
What I am doing does not rely on any clustering implementation. This
is how it will work:
1. User configures a cluster and a set of nodes belonging to it. You
can expect this type of GBeans:
class="org.apache.geronimo.clustering.config.BasicClusterInfo">
${PlanCluster
On Nov 1, 2007, at 9:59 AM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
Yes, that's a good idea. Also, excellent work with reviewing the
LoginModules and adding tests!!!
I just added two new LoginModules to look at. I'm particularly
concerned about CertificateChainLoginModule since it always returns
true in its login(
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3570?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12540321
]
David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-3570:
In rev 592223 I supplied an AbstractLoginModuleTest that uniformi
Gianny,
Since there are multiple clustering implementations going on at the same
time, could you please keep us aprised of what you are doing so we don't
clash?
Thanks,
Jeff
Gianny Damour wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I resumed this week-end some work on clustered deployment. I think this
> will be complet
Hi,
I resumed this week-end some work on clustered deployment. I think
this will be completed in about 2-3 weeks. This will allow
distribute, uninstall, start, stop, et cetera of configurations to a
cluster as a single logic operation. I am keen to get this change in
for 2.1, if it does n
Hello,
Is there a standalone ServiceMix Client jar that I can use to make calls
to ServiceMix from a Tomcat servlet?
I was able to run the v3.2 ServiceMix Client JUnit test case to talk to
our our services, but it seems like I am including a lot of jars which
may be causing us some issues.
You can make the online deployer work with this patch to framework/
config/jsr88-deploymentfactory/pom.xml:
Index: pom.xml
===
--- pom.xml (revision 591736)
+++ pom.xml (working copy)
@@ -70,6 +70,27 @@
commons-
+1, this will help users wishing to customize their valve chain.
Best wishes,
Paul
On Nov 5, 2007, at 4:19 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:
Would anybody have a strong objection if I renamed the GBeans for
the Tomcat valves from "FirstValve" and "SecondValve" to reflect
the function of the valves thems
+1 go for it. The first valve/second valve came from it being an
example due to the chain...I guess it just kinda stuck ;-)
Jeff
Joe Bohn wrote:
> Would anybody have a strong objection if I renamed the GBeans for the
> Tomcat valves from "FirstValve" and "SecondValve" to reflect the
> function o
Would anybody have a strong objection if I renamed the GBeans for the
Tomcat valves from "FirstValve" and "SecondValve" to reflect the
function of the valves themselves?
FirstValve --> AccessLogValve
SecondValve --> SingleSignOnValve
Joe
I would like to take a crack at SM-580. The patch attached seems to apply to
the HttpEndpoint. I would like to do make the fix for HttpProviderEndpoint.
It seems easy enough:
Add property to endpoint
Set property to marshaller in endpoint init
Have the marshaller look up property (same as cont
OpenEJB trunk at 592120
Geronimo Revision: 592134 built with tests included
See the full build-1500.log file at
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/trunk/20071105/build-1500.log
[INFO] [car:package]
Downloading: http://download.java.net/maven/1//axis/poms/axis-saaj-1.4.pom
Downloading
Unfortunately I'm not going to be going to ApacheCon's in the US but to the
EU ones
from now on. However I would love to either get a summary or partake in the
discussion
if someone can ping me from IRC or via skype. This is something I think
will benefit us
all. Thanks David for driving these t
I've worked a bit on integrating Roller and Jetspeed2 into Geronimo
and one thing that quickly becomes clear is that the authorization
security requirements of these "dynamic content" applications are
almost completely unrelated to the javaee security specifications.
One small possible ove
Agreed, we seem to have enough new stuff to call for a release.
Here is a list trying to consolidate these new functions/improvements
- GShell
- Console enhancements (dep plan generation, grouping/collapsing?)
- Monitoring
- Plugin infrastructure
- Pluggable console
- Security
- Configuration (c
Thanks Erik. I just corrected this typo in rev 592043.
Lin
On Nov 4, 2007 4:49 PM, Erik B. Craig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Donald,
> The deployable and repo look good... however I found a small potential
> issue in j2g-eclipse-plugin-1.0.0-RC1-updatesite.zip... Within
> plugins/org.apache.ger
On 11/1/07, Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I think it's time to start discussing the particulars of a 2.1 release.
>
> There's been a lot of advancements made in our plugin infrastructure.
> There's also been the pluggable console enhancements. It would be good
> to get a release out,
On 11/2/07, Prasad Kashyap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 11/2/07, Joe Bohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Prasad Kashyap wrote:
> > > As we get close to releasing Geronimo 2.1 and look beyond, I'd like to
>
> > > discuss a few usability improvements we can do to G. I am
> > > cross-post
+1
Lin
On Nov 2, 2007 3:40 PM, Donald Woods <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The J2G 1.0.0 RC1 build is ready for a vote, now that the
> maven-plugins-1.0 dependencies have been released (should appear on the
> mirror repos in the next 24 hours.)
>
> A 72 hour vote is being called for the following:
OpenEJB trunk at 591982
Geronimo Revision: 591999 built with tests included
See the full build-0900.log file at
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/trunk/20071105/build-0900.log
[INFO] [car:prepare-plan]
[INFO] Generated:
/home/prasad/geronimo/trunk/plugins/axis/axis/target/resources
OpenEJB trunk at 591897
Geronimo Revision: 591907 built with tests included
See the full build-0300.log file at
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/trunk/20071105/build-0300.log
[INFO] [car:prepare-plan]
[INFO] Generated:
/home/prasad/geronimo/trunk/plugins/axis/axis/target/resources
26 matches
Mail list logo
