Here is a draft:
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SM/2007-11-14
If I missed something, please edit it asap.
On Nov 12, 2007 11:30 PM, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, we need one as a TLP, not as an incubator project ;-)
On Nov 12, 2007 11:22 PM, Bruce Snyder
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-810?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Guillaume Nodet resolved SM-810.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 3.3
3.2.1
3.1.3
Put mandatory osgi entries in the JBI artifacts so that those artifacts can be
deployed as bundles
--
Key: SM-1135
URL:
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1103?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_40590
]
David Medinets commented on SM-1103:
I am running into this problem while starting ServiceMix from inside Eclipse
It appears that CXF does support most of the WS-*
Has anyone used Microsoft WCF based clients/services to show full
interoperability?
ArmenH wrote:
Does ServiceMix fully support WSIT?
If not, are there plans to support it?
CXF is still not fully compliant with WSIT.
--
View
Hi,
We already have servicemix-cxf-bc to leverage ws-* feature from cxf.
And I also know cxf team do lots of interoperability test between cxf
and WCF(including ws-* feature), if you are interested in this issue, I
guess you could post this thread on cxf mailling list, where more people
can
Thanks,
Is the CXF used in ServiceMix version 2.0.2?
Freeman Fang wrote:
Hi,
We already have servicemix-cxf-bc to leverage ws-* feature from cxf.
And I also know cxf team do lots of interoperability test between cxf
and WCF(including ws-* feature), if you are interested in this issue,
PreDestroy being called for each exchange when it's not configured that way.
Key: SM-1136
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1136
Project: ServiceMix
Just to clarify, I think CXF is used in ServiceMix version 3.2, not
version 2.0.2.
Regards,
Bo
On Nov 13, 2007 1:10 PM, Freeman Fang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes
Freeman
ArmenH wrote:
Thanks,
Is the CXF used in ServiceMix version 2.0.2?
Freeman Fang wrote:
Hi,
We
From my understanding, I think the question is
What's the CXF version used in servicemix? :-)
Regards
Freeman
Bozhong Lin wrote:
Just to clarify, I think CXF is used in ServiceMix version 3.2, not
version 2.0.2.
Regards,
Bo
On Nov 13, 2007 1:10 PM, Freeman Fang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OpenEJB trunk at 594033
Geronimo Revision: 594041 built with tests included
See the full build-0300.log file at
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/trunk/20071112/build-0300.log
[INFO] [enforcer:enforce {execution: default}]
[INFO] [tools:copy-legal-files {execution: install-legal-files
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1119?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gert Vanthienen resolved SM-1119.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 3.3
3.2.1
3.1.3
Distribution and start/stop of clustered deployments
Key: GERONIMO-3597
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3597
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: New Feature
Security
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3597?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gianny Damour reassigned GERONIMO-3597:
---
Assignee: Gianny Damour
Distribution and start/stop of clustered deployments
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3597?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gianny Damour closed GERONIMO-3597.
---
Resolution: Fixed
This is now implemented.
Distribution and start/stop of clustered
Hi,
I have just checked in support for distribution of configurations to
clusters and also management, i.e. start/stop, of such clustered
deployments.
I will try to explain how everything hangs together so that people
can jump in, provide feedback, request enhancements etc.
There is
Geronimo Revision: 594126 built with tests included
See the full build-0900.log file at
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/2.0/20071112/build-0900.log
Results :
Tests run: 30, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0
[INFO] [jar:jar]
[INFO] [tools:verify-legal-files {execution: verify-legal
OpenEJB trunk at 594097
Geronimo Revision: 594151 built with tests included
See the full build-0900.log file at
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/trunk/20071112/build-0900.log
[INFO] [enforcer:enforce {execution: default}]
[INFO] [tools:copy-legal-files {execution: install-legal-files
/~prasad/binaries/trunk/20071112/build-0300.log
[INFO] [enforcer:enforce {execution: default}]
[INFO] [tools:copy-legal-files {execution: install-legal-files}]
[INFO] [site:attach-descriptor]
[INFO] [tools:verify-legal-files {execution: verify-legal-files}]
[INFO] [install:install]
[INFO] Installing
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1119?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_40587
]
Jorge RodrÃguez Pedrianes commented on SM-1119:
---
Hello!
I've seen your patch but I think that it can
Gianny Damour wrote:
2. The clustered store uploads the backed configuration to the
registered cluster members, which subsequently locally install them. If
the remote installation fails for one of the members, then the
clustered store removes the configuration from all the members having
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3502?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jarek Gawor resolved GERONIMO-3502.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.1
I updated the module conditions to the
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1119?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_40588
]
Gert Vanthienen commented on SM-1119:
-
Right you are! Although every message will be re-encoded by the
Geronimo Revision: 594270 built with tests included
See the full build-1500.log file at
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/2.0/20071112/build-1500.log
central (http://repo1.maven.org/maven2),
java.net (http://download.java.net/maven/1/),
apache.snapshots (http://people.apache.org
On 13/11/2007, at 4:35 AM, Jeff Genender wrote:
Gianny Damour wrote:
2. The clustered store uploads the backed configuration to the
registered cluster members, which subsequently locally install
them. If
the remote installation fails for one of the members, then the
clustered store
Hi Gianny,
Lots of newbie questions from me. I'm not even going to pretend that I
understand your clustering changes just yet ... so please bear with me.
I just want to point out a few things that I noticed with a single
server instance and get your take on them.
1) Deploying a simple
Hi,
I have to represent the Project Apache Geronimo during a lecture of
Software Project Management.
Is it possible to send me the Geronimo Project Management Documents (more
precisely : aim of the architecture, all about the stepps of development,
development constraints, logical context,
On Nov 12, 2007 9:23 PM, nezha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have to represent the Project Apache Geronimo during a lecture of
Software Project Management.
Is it possible to send me the Geronimo Project Management Documents (more
precisely : aim of the architecture, all about the stepps of
OpenEJB trunk at 594097
Geronimo Revision: 594279 built with tests included
See the full build-1500.log file at
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/trunk/20071112/build-1500.log
[INFO] Installing
/home/prasad/geronimo/trunk/applications/mejb/geronimo-mejb/target/geronimo-mejb-2.1
NullpointerException on DeliveryChannel.send()
--
Key: SM-1134
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1134
Project: ServiceMix
Issue Type: Bug
Components: servicemix-bean
Thanks so much
I haven't got the first reply, perhaps a problem was done.
thanks for the documentation
Jacek Laskowski wrote:
On Nov 12, 2007 9:23 PM, nezha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have to represent the Project Apache Geronimo during a lecture of
Software Project Management.
Is
Hi,
I thought it's fixed long ago, but came across an issue with deploying
a zip as an ear project from Eclipse again, i.e. Eclipse tries to
deploy a file with zip extension as ear and Geronimo refuses it. Can
we do anything about it, like accepting any files if they contain
descriptors with
False alarm. Disregard.
Jacek
On Nov 12, 2007 10:22 PM, Jacek Laskowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I thought it's fixed long ago, but came across an issue with deploying
a zip as an ear project from Eclipse again, i.e. Eclipse tries to
deploy a file with zip extension as ear and Geronimo
@HandlerChain annotation processor always inserts handlers from annotation
--
Key: GERONIMO-3598
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3598
Project: Geronimo
On 11/12/07, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The meeting will take place this week at ApacheCon.
I will work on a draft asap.
I already submitted a quick note in the ServiceMix report stating that
ServiceMix has graduated from the Incubator. However, the MoinMoin
wiki config seems to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GSHELL-16?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12541963
]
Jason Dillon commented on GSHELL-16:
I'm a little bit confused on the functionality of this patch and how it
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GSHELL-16?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Dillon updated GSHELL-16:
---
Description:
Create a {{ssh}} command that provides similar functionality to the unix shell
Well, we need one as a TLP, not as an incubator project ;-)
On Nov 12, 2007 11:22 PM, Bruce Snyder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/12/07, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The meeting will take place this week at ApacheCon.
I will work on a draft asap.
I already submitted a quick
I ran into Steve Toback at apachecon today and he's been telling me a
bit about Lokahi... it looks like we should definitely investigate
whether we should combine it with gshell for remote management of
multiple geronimo instances.
thanks
david jencks
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GSHELL-16?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12542007
]
Ken Treiman commented on GSHELL-16:
---
Yes, sorry, it wasn't clear what you wanted. Connecting to a normal sshd
What do you need done here to use the RSH bits sans-Plexus?
Going forward I'm really wondering if I want to abstract the IoC bits
which Plexus provides or not. Seems like if I do want that, then I
have to duplicate a lot of what it provides for me already. I have
already duplicated some
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jarek Gawor resolved GERONIMO-3598.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.1
2.0.x
Committed fixes to
Gianny Damour wrote:
You can successfully distribute when all the configured cluster
members are running. If one of them is down, then the installation
fails. This seems to be a typical scenario - at least based on the
clustered deployments I have been working with.
Hmmm...I have found
On 13/11/2007, at 4:42 PM, Jeff Genender wrote:
Gianny Damour wrote:
You can successfully distribute when all the configured cluster
members are running. If one of them is down, then the installation
fails. This seems to be a typical scenario - at least based on the
clustered deployments I
44 matches
Mail list logo
