In ServiceMix we have rewritten the JAXB specs jars (2.0 and 2.1)
because we needed to be able to do some modifications for OSGi.
We'd like to move them to the Geronimo Specs subproject as it would be
more consistent and would allow them to pass the TCK.
The code base are available at:
Fine with me!
david jencks
On Oct 23, 2008, at 11:29 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
In ServiceMix we have rewritten the JAXB specs jars (2.0 and 2.1)
because we needed to be able to do some modifications for OSGi.
We'd like to move them to the Geronimo Specs subproject as it would be
more
Geronimo Revision: 707548 built with tests included
See the full build-0200.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.0/20081024/build-0200.log
Download the binaries from
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.0/20081024
[INFO] BUILD
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4124?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Jencks updated GERONIMO-4124:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0.4)
I'm sure this won't get fixed in 2.0.x and doubt it will
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3316?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Jencks updated GERONIMO-3316:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0.4)
I don't think there is any chance this will be fixed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4375?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shawn Jiang updated GERONIMO-4375:
--
Attachment: GERONIMO-4375_21branch.patch
This is a patch for 2.1 branch based on the
Geronimo Revision: 707568 built with tests included
See the full build-0300.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20081024/build-0300.log
Download the binaries from
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20081024
[INFO] BUILD
This sounds like a good thing to me too.
Rick
Guillaume Nodet wrote:
In ServiceMix we have rewritten the JAXB specs jars (2.0 and 2.1)
because we needed to be able to do some modifications for OSGi.
We'd like to move them to the Geronimo Specs subproject as it would be
more consistent and
I will commit the EJB Portlet next week once I am clear on which
version to put in. I have one suing 0.4 of dojo and another using 1.1
Regards
Manu
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 7:34 PM, Donald Woods [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, looks like we're making good progress towards a 2.2 release.
I have two versions of the EJB Portlet with me. One with dojo 0.4.3
and another with Dojo 1.x. There are 2 possibilities on how to
integrate it.
1) Check in the portlet with dojo 0.4.3 support now as we do not ship
Dojo 1.1 with the default server assembly. Later migrate to Dojo 1.1
if we remove
How about a modified version of No. 1 -
Include as a console plugin that has the geronimo-dojo plugin (which
includes the dojo mini v1.1.1) as the dependency. I think having the
geronimo-dojo as the dependency will automatically include dojo 1.1.1
mini into the assembly.We are looking at
Geronimo Revision: 707624 built with tests included
See the full build-0900.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20081024/build-0900.log
Download the binaries from
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20081024
[INFO] BUILD
IllegalArgumentException thrown in LogginProcessorTest
--
Key: GSHELL-121
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GSHELL-121
Project: GShell
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: public
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GSHELL-121?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jamie goodyear updated GSHELL-121:
--
Attachment: gshell-121.txt
See attachment: gshell-121.txt
Contains modification to file:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4368?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Woods updated GERONIMO-4368:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.1.4)
(was: 2.1.3)
OpenJPA can't find
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4368?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Woods closed GERONIMO-4368.
--
Resolution: Invalid
closing as invalid, as no code changes were required
OpenJPA can't
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4368?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Woods reopened GERONIMO-4368:
reopening, as this should have been marked as canceled instead of fixed, as no
code
Hey Joe,
Not releasing any more 2.0.x was one of the possible choices that I was
leaning toward too. The only thing that kept it from being my first
recommendation was that I was sad that so much work on the 2.0 branch
would never get its day in the sun (at least not as 2.0).
But, as far as
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1807?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Jencks updated GERONIMO-1807:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0.4)
Wish List
This isn't going to happen
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4375?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12642503#action_12642503
]
David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-4375:
There are problems in trunk that will
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4360?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12642511#action_12642511
]
David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-4360:
Rev 707709 attempts to restore
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4375?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12642510#action_12642510
]
David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-4375:
I think the additional problems in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4360?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12642513#action_12642513
]
David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-4360:
Initial security context import in rev
Geronimo Revision: 707723 built with tests included
See the full build-1500.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20081024/build-1500.log
See the unit test reports at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20081024/unit-test
Hi,
I am not able to build trunk due to xbean-3.5-SNAPSHOT being missing
from the apache.snapshots Maven repo: http://people.apache.org/repo/
m2-snapshot-repository/org/apache/xbean/
Snapshots have been deployed to this repo on Oct 23rd. Any ideas?
Thanks,
Gianny
On Oct 24, 2008, at 3:18 PM, Gianny Damour wrote:
Hi,
I am not able to build trunk due to xbean-3.5-SNAPSHOT being missing
from the apache.snapshots Maven repo: http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository/org/apache/xbean/
Snapshots have been deployed to this repo on Oct 23rd.
Geronimo Security, now and coming soon
Security can be divided into negotiation for credentials, credential
validation, and authorization.
First we'll look at setting up and swapping credential validation in
geronimio, a simple process everyone has to do to secure an application.
Then
David,
2 cents, how would one secure Geronimo in an enterprise scenario (say
LDAP servers) would help the admin guys i think.
-- dims
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 7:07 PM, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Geronimo Security, now and coming soon
Security can be divided into negotiation for
Hi
Is there any way I can create custom resource
factories/ObjectFactories in geronimo.?
Regards,
Hearty
On Oct 24, 2008, at 4:40 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
David,
2 cents, how would one secure Geronimo in an enterprise scenario (say
LDAP servers) would help the admin guys i think.
That would be using the ldap login module? I could use that as the
example of swapping credential validation.
On Oct 24, 2008, at 1:49 AM, Hearty Raphael wrote:
Hi
Is there any way I can create custom resource factories/
ObjectFactories in geronimo.?
probably, but knowing exactly what you are trying to achieve would
help a lot. Geronimo has no persistent jndi so there's usually an
Geronimo Revision: 707784 built with tests included
See the full build-2000.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.0/20081024/build-2000.log
Download the binaries from
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.0/20081024
[INFO] BUILD
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4232?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevan Miller closed GERONIMO-4232.
--
Resolution: Invalid
Not a problem. User wasn't using MDB's at all, but had set up some
33 matches
Mail list logo
