Extend rename for ejb/connector/ear project,too, meanwhile rename artifactId
in these deployment plans.
-
Key: GERONIMODEVTOOLS-592
URL:
+1
2009/9/16 Ivan xhh...@gmail.com
+1
2009/9/16 Donald Woods dwo...@apache.org
+1
Donald
David Jencks wrote:
For various reasons we are now using a forked copy of tomcat derived from
the tomcat 6.0.20 release, built with maven, with maven dependencies, etc
etc.
The code changes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-592?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rodger Zhang updated GERONIMODEVTOOLS-592:
--
Attachment: rename_for_other_kind_projects.patch
Attach the patch,
Geronimo Revision: 816074 built with tests included
See the full build-0300.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090917/build-0300.log
See the unit test reports at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090917/unit-test
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4222?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12756410#action_12756410
]
Forrest Xia commented on GERONIMO-4222:
---
I verified that the modified
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-591?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Delos Dai resolved GERONIMODEVTOOLS-591.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.2.0
2.1.5
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4879?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shawn Jiang resolved GERONIMO-4879.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Resolved the major problem, please open another JIRA for the second
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4870?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shawn Jiang reassigned GERONIMO-4870:
-
Assignee: Shawn Jiang
NameService returns IOR pointing to host 0.0.0.0
Forget this, I've found another way to avoid using BasePortlet.setProperty
to update the connector properties.
Thanks.
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 11:36 AM, Shawn Jiang genspr...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm working on recovering connector portlet recently because the connector
configuration was changed
Suggest presetting sslCertificateFile as one of the focused field
-
Key: GERONIMO-4880
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4880
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type:
State of Tomcat BIO HTTP Connector will turn into :failed after stopped
Key: GERONIMO-4881
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4881
Project: Geronimo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-590?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Delos Dai resolved GERONIMODEVTOOLS-590.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.2.0
2.1.5
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-584?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12756444#action_12756444
]
Delos Dai commented on GERONIMODEVTOOLS-584:
It's not a easily
Geronimo Revision: 816152 built with tests included
See the full build-0800.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20090917/build-0800.log
See the unit test reports at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20090917/unit-test-reports
Thanks Donald for the info.
I think it's kinda confusing to keep 2 copies the identical content for
Geronimo. Maybe we should remove relevant pages from Doc space, since
commiters will maintain these infos?
And for GEP binaries in http://people.apache.org/dist/geronimo/eclipse/ ,
any
Geronimo Revision: 816174 built with tests included
See the full build-0900.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090917/build-0900.log
See the unit test reports at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090917/unit-test
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4603?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ivan reassigned GERONIMO-4603:
--
Assignee: Ivan
PropertiesLoginManager is hardwired to properties-login login module
be resolved ?
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 9:20 PM, ga...@apache.org wrote:
Geronimo Revision: 816174 built with tests included
See the full build-0900.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090917/build-0900.log
See the unit test reports at
http
snapshots versions in
root pom.xml. When will these artifacts problems be resolved ?
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 8:16 PM, ga...@apache.org wrote:
Geronimo Revision: 816152 built with tests included
See the full build-0800.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20090917
I forgot to note that this artifact depends on the geronimo-
jpa_1.0_spec artifact also currently under vote, so this vote depends
on that vote.
thanks
david jencks
On Sep 15, 2009, at 5:31 PM, David Jencks wrote:
For various reasons we are now using a forked copy of tomcat derived
from
build-0800.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20090917/build-0800.log
See the unit test reports at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20090917/unit-test-reports
--
1 required artifact is missing.
for artifact
Yep, saw that, and wondered why our Tomcat artifacts depend on the JPA
Spec?
-Donald
David Jencks wrote:
I forgot to note that this artifact depends on the geronimo-jpa_1.0_spec
artifact also currently under vote, so this vote depends on that vote.
thanks
david jencks
On Sep 15,
Geronimo Revision: 816307 built with tests included
See the full build-1400.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20090917/build-1400.log
See the unit test reports at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20090917/unit-test-reports
Geronimo Revision: 816335 built with tests included
See the full build-1500.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090917/build-1500.log
See the unit test reports at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090917/unit-test
Hi,
Recently, I opened GERONIMO-4683 in G about the Transaction.commit
signature is missing the IllegalStateException. The reason why I
raised this JIRA is because in OSGi RFC 98 (Transaction in OSGi)
compliance test, we use Geronimo's JTA spec jar as the baseline.
During OSGi RFC 98 compliance
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4222?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12756858#action_12756858
]
David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-4222:
Absolutely the best solution for this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-306?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12756860#action_12756860
]
David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-306:
---
no one really stepped up for this until
Geronimo Revision: 816413 built with tests included
See the full build-2000.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20090917/build-2000.log
See the unit test reports at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20090917/unit-test-reports
Geronimo Revision: 816421 built with tests included
See the full build-2100.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090917/build-2100.log
See the unit test reports at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090917/unit-test
Could someone please set up the editor access for me? I really hope that I
can get the access within this week.
Thank you very much!
Ellen
2009/9/17 Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com
Can somebody set up access for Ellen? I've confirmed that there's an ICLA
on file...
--kevan
On Sep 16,
I think I just added you to the correct group. You'll probably have to
logoff and logon again. Respond here if it does not work for some reason.
Joe
Ellen Tang wrote:
Could someone please set up the editor access for me? I really hope that
I can get the access within this week.
Thank you
On Sep 17, 2009, at 9:42 PM, Ellen Tang wrote:
Could someone please set up the editor access for me? I really hope
that I can get the access within this week.
Ellen,
Sorry for the delay. You should have access, now...
--kevan
Hi all,
Thank you very much for you help. I do have the editor access now.
Cheers!
Ellen
2009/9/18 Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com
On Sep 17, 2009, at 9:42 PM, Ellen Tang wrote:
Could someone please set up the editor access for me? I really hope that I
can get the access within this
some doc update in G22 might be caused by bugs in code.
---
Key: GERONIMO-4882
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4882
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
Security
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Delos Dai closed GERONIMODEVTOOLS-586.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.2.0
2.1.5
Since
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4881?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12756919#action_12756919
]
Siqi Du commented on GERONIMO-4881:
---
can not recreate it.
State of Tomcat BIO HTTP
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4881?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12756922#action_12756922
]
Shiny Cheng commented on GERONIMO-4881:
---
Hi, I've verified this on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4881?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shiny Cheng closed GERONIMO-4881.
-
Resolution: Fixed
State of Tomcat BIO HTTP Connector will turn into :failed after stopped
ship agent-car-jmx and make it default agent, mark ejb agent as load=false.
Key: GERONIMO-4883
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4883
Project:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-592?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Delos Dai resolved GERONIMODEVTOOLS-592.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.2.0
2.1.5
Agreed, since it won't hurt.
-Jack
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 4:13 AM, Lin Sun linsun@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Recently, I opened GERONIMO-4683 in G about the Transaction.commit
signature is missing the IllegalStateException. The reason why I
raised this JIRA is because in OSGi RFC 98
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4855?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rex Wang closed GERONIMO-4855.
--
Resolution: Invalid
Following is copied from tomcat document.
-
Cluster Basics:
To run
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4830?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rex Wang closed GERONIMO-4830.
--
Commit new debug-view portlets codes
Key:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4832?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rex Wang closed GERONIMO-4832.
--
Modify EJB portlets to fit the new APIs of Tree and TreeEntry
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4831?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rex Wang closed GERONIMO-4831.
--
stop building dojo-0.4.3 from ext
-
Key:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4790?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rex Wang closed GERONIMO-4790.
--
Migrate debug-views code to base on the up-to-date dojo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4883?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shawn Jiang reassigned GERONIMO-4883:
-
Assignee: Shawn Jiang
ship agent-car-jmx and make it default agent, mark ejb agent
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4723?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rex Wang closed GERONIMO-4723.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 3.0
2.2
Has been fixed, so closing it.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4874?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12756981#action_12756981
]
Shawn Jiang commented on GERONIMO-4874:
---
Have you run the testsuite successfully
49 matches
Mail list logo
